IP Library Granted Patent US 8,852,273
Granted Patent B2
US 8,852,273 · App. 13/531,170 · Granted Oct 7, 2014

Correction of higher order aberrations in intraocular lenses

Inventors: Xin Hong (Arlington, TX); Mutlu Karakelle (Fort Worth, TX); Xiaoxiao Zhang (Fort Worth, TX)
Assignee: Novartis AG
A61F2/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,852,273
App. No.
13/531,170
Granted
Oct 7, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one aspect, the present invention provides a method of designing an intraocular lens (IOL) to address variations of at least one ocular parameter in a population of patient eyes. The method can include establishing at least one eye model in which the ocular parameter can be varied over a range exhibited by the population. The eye model can be employed to evaluate a plurality of IOL designs in correcting visual acuity for eyes in the patient population. An IOL design that provides a best fit for visual performance over at least a portion of the parameter range can then be selected.

Claims (31)

1. An intraocular lens (IOL) comprising an optic, the optic comprising an anterior surface and a posterior surface, the optic being manufactured by the process of:

establishing at least one eye model in which the ocular parameter can be varied over a range exhibited by the population,

employing the eye model to evaluate a plurality of IOL designs for visual performance for eyes in the patient population,

applying a weighting function to visual performance exhibited by the plurality of IOL designs, said function being based on distribution of the ocular parameter in the population,

selecting an IOL design that provides a best fit for visual performance over at least a portion of the range exhibited by the population;

and manufacturing at least one IOL according to the selected IOL design.

2. The IOL of claim 1 , wherein said visual performance comprises visual acuity.

3. The IOL of claim 2 , further comprising determining the best fit for visual acuity as an optimal value of a weighted visual acuity among the IOL designs.

4. The IOL of claim 2 , further comprising determining a modulation transfer function at the retina of the eye model for obtaining the visual acuity exhibited by the plurality of IOL designs.

5. The IOL of claim 1 , further comprising generating said plurality of IOL designs based on varying at least one lens design parameter.

6. The IOL of claim 1 , wherein said ocular parameter comprises ocular axial length.

7. The IOL of claim 1 , wherein said ocular parameter comprises corneal asphericity.

8. The IOL of claim 1 , wherein said ocular parameter comprises corneal radius.

9. The IOL of claim 1 , wherein said ocular parameter comprises ocular anterior chamber depth.

10. An intraocular lens (IOL) comprising an optic, the optic comprising an anterior surface and a posterior surface, the optic being manufactured by the process of:

generating a human eye model in which at least one ocular biometric parameter can be varied,

evaluating optical performance of a plurality of IOL designs by incorporating the designs in the eye model and varying said ocular parameter over at least a portion of a range exhibited by eyes in a patient population, and

applying a weighting function to visual performance exhibited by the plurality of IOL designs, said function being based on distribution of the ocular parameter in the population,

selecting one of the IOL designs that provides a desirable level of performance; and manufacturing at least one IOL according to the selected IOL design.

11. The IOL of claim 10 , wherein said ocular parameter comprises any of corneal radius, corneal asphericity, anterior chamber depth or ocular axial length.

12. The IOL of claim 10 , further comprising generating said IOL designs by varying at least one lens design parameter.

13. The IOL of claim 12 , wherein said lens design parameter comprises any of a conic constant of an aspherical lens surface, two conic constants associated with a toric lens surface or an apodization function associated with step heights at zone boundaries of a diffractive pattern disposed on a lens surface.

14. The IOL of claim 10 , wherein the step of evaluating optical performance of the plurality of IOL designs further comprises employing the eye model to determine an average visual acuity provided by that design over said ocular parameter range.

15. The IOL of claim 14 , further comprising calculating a modulation transfer function at the retina of the eye model for determining said visual acuity.

16. The IOL of claim 10 , further comprising identifying the IOL design of the plurality of IOL designs that exhibits the largest weighted average visual acuity as providing an optimal performance.

17. The IOL of claim 10 , further comprising utilizing Monte Carlo simulation for varying said ocular parameter.

18. The IOL of claim 10 , further comprising incorporating an estimate of manufacturing tolerance associated with at least one lens characteristic into the plurality of IOL designs.

19. The IOL of claim 18 , wherein said lens characteristic comprises irregularities associated with a lens surface.

20. The IOL of claim 18 , wherein said lens characteristic comprises a radius of a lens surface.

21. The IOL of claim 18 , wherein said lens characteristic comprises an asphericity of a lens surface.

22. The IOL of claim 18 , wherein said lens characteristic comprises lens thickness.

Assignments (1)
CONFIRMATORY DEED OF ASSIGNMENT EFFECTIVE APRIL 8, 2019 Recorded Dec 10, 2019
From: NOVARTIS AG
To: ALCON INC.
Reel/Frame 051454/0788 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 12971125 · Dec 17, 2010
Continuation 11435905 · May 17, 2006
Related Publication 20120262670A1 · Oct 18, 2012