IP Library Patent Application 13539285
Patent Application
App. No. 13/539,285

Computer Implemented Method, Computer System And Nontransitory Computer Readable Storage Medium For Matching URL With Web Site

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
13/539,285
Abstract

A computer implemented method, a computer system or a nontransitory computer readable storage medium for matching a URL with one of a plurality of web sites. The method, system or medium may be configured for use with a device having one or more processors and a memory storing one or more programs for execution by the one or more processors. The one or more programs may include instructions for: capturing an HTTP request and a Web application context, resolving a match context for the HTTP request and the Web application context, resolving a set of top-level rules for evaluating the HTTP request and the Web application context, evaluating the match context against a first rule among the top-level rules, and invoking an action for modifying one or more of the HTTP request, the Web application context, and the match context.

Claims (67)

1 . A computer implemented method for matching a URL with one of a plurality of web sites, the computer implemented method comprising:

on a device having one or more processors and a memory storing one or more programs for execution by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for:

capturing an HTTP request and a Web application context,

resolving a match context for the HTTP request and the Web application context,

resolving a set of top-level rules for evaluating the HTTP request and the Web application context,

evaluating the match context against a first rule among the top-level rules, and

invoking an action for modifying one or more of the HTTP request, the Web application context, and the match context.

2 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

evaluating the first rule against the match context, and advancing to a next rule if the first rule does not match,

determining whether an action supports context updates and updating the match context against an action attribute and value if the action supports context updates, and

determining whether the action supports child rules and advancing to a first rule in the child rule set if the action supports child rules.

3 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

determining whether the action supports continuation, advancing to a next rule in a current set of rules or a next rule in a parent set of rules if the action supports continuation, and

ending HTTP request processing and returning control to a hosting runtime when the action does not support continuation.

4 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computer implemented method supports vanity URLs.

5 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein a core gateway of an identity management system comprises the one or more programs.

6 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

iterating through a set of preconfigured rules and testing the HTTP request against each rule in turn, wherein each rule is defined by a match test and a match action.

7 . The computer implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the match test is a description of an attribute of the match context that should be tested against.

8 . The computer implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the match action is an operation to be invoked upon a successful match test.

9 . The computer implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the match test is defined by one of an evaluation kind that determines how the test should be evaluated, an attribute of the match context to test against, and an argument value to resolve the test against.

10 . The computer implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the evaluation kind is an equality test, wherein the attribute is a URL path and wherein the argument value is a comparison value.

11 . A computer system for matching a URL with one of a plurality of web sites, the computer system comprising:

one or more processors; and

memory to store:

one or more programs, the one or more programs comprising instructions for:

capturing an HTTP request and a Web application context,

resolving a match context for the HTTP request and the Web application context,

resolving a set of top-level rules for evaluating the HTTP request and the Web application context,

evaluating the match context against a first rule among the top-level rules, and

invoking an action for modifying one or more of the HTTP request, the Web application context, and the match context.

12 . The computer system of claim 11 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

evaluating the first rule against the match context, and advancing to a next rule if the first rule does not match,

determining whether an action supports context updates and updating the match context against an action attribute and value if the action supports context updates, and

determining whether the action supports child rules and advancing to a first rule in the child rule set if the action supports child rules.

13 . The computer system of claim 11 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

determining whether the action supports continuation, advancing to a next rule in a current set of rules or a next rule in a parent set of rules if the action supports continuation, and

ending HTTP request processing and returning control to a hosting runtime when the action does not support continuation.

14 . The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the computer system supports vanity URLs.

15 . The computer system of claim 11 , wherein a core gateway of an identity management system comprises the one or more programs.

16 . The computer system of claim 11 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

iterating through a set of preconfigured rules and testing the HTTP request against each rule in turn, wherein each rule is defined by a match test and a match action.

17 . The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the match test is a description of an attribute of the match context that should be tested against.

18 . The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the match action is an operation to be invoked upon a successful match test.

19 . The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the match test is defined by one of an evaluation kind that determines how the test should be evaluated, an attribute of the match context to test against, and an argument value to resolve the test against.

20 . The computer system of claim 19 , wherein the evaluation kind is an equality test, wherein the attribute is a URL path and wherein the argument value is a comparison value.

21 . A nontransitory computer readable storage medium storing one or more programs configured to be executed by one or more processing units at a computer comprising instructions for:

capturing an HTTP request and a Web application context,

resolving a match context for the HTTP request and the Web application context,

resolving a set of top-level rules for evaluating the HTTP request and the Web application context,

evaluating the match context against a first rule among the top-level rules, and

invoking an action for modifying one or more of the HTTP request, the Web application context, and the match context.

22 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 21 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

evaluating the first rule against the match context, and advancing to a next rule if the first rule does not match,

determining whether an action supports context updates and updating the match context against an action attribute and value if the action supports context updates, and

determining whether the action supports child rules and advancing to a first rule in the child rule set if the action supports child rules.

23 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 21 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

determining whether the action supports continuation, advancing to a next rule in a current set of rules or a next rule in a parent set of rules if the action supports continuation, and

ending HTTP request processing and returning control to a hosting runtime when the action does not support continuation.

24 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 21 , wherein the nontransitory computer readable storage medium supports vanity URLs.

25 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 21 , wherein a core gateway of an identity management system comprises the one or more programs.

26 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 21 , the one or more programs further including instructions for:

iterating through a set of preconfigured rules and testing the HTTP request against each rule in turn, wherein each rule is defined by a match test and a match action.

27 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 26 , wherein the match test is a description of an attribute of the match context that should be tested against.

28 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 26 , wherein the match action is an operation to be invoked upon a successful match test.

29 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 26 , wherein the match test is defined by one of an evaluation kind that determines how the test should be evaluated, an attribute of the match context to test against, and an argument value to resolve the test against.

30 . The nontransitory computer readable storage medium of claim 29 , wherein the evaluation kind is an equality test, wherein the attribute is a URL path and wherein the argument value is a comparison value.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 2, 2021
From: BRIGHTWOOD LOAN SERVICES LLC
To: SONTIQ, INC.
Reel/Frame 058273/0355 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 14, 2018
From: NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
To: EZSHIELD, INC.
Reel/Frame 046814/0033 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 7, 2018
From: EZSHIELD, INC.; IDENTITYFORCE, INC.
To: BRIGHTWOOD LOAN SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 046576/0477 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 1, 2017
From: EZSHIELD, INC.
To: NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
Reel/Frame 043155/0600 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2017
From: PROSPECT CAPITAL CORPORATION
To: EZSHIELD, INC.
Reel/Frame 043089/0334 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 20, 2017
From: NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
To: EZSHIELD, INC.
Reel/Frame 042301/0833 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 28, 2017
From: EZSHIELD, INC.
To: PROSPECT CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 041766/0840 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 22, 2017
From: EZSHIELD, INC.
To: NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
Reel/Frame 041333/0045 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2012
From: BEKKER, EUGENE; LAFFOON, DARRELL LEE; BAKER, JOSEPH P.; BRIDGES, JONATHAN MARC HUET
To: EZSHIELD, INC.
Reel/Frame 028982/0199 →