IP Library Granted Patent US 8,696,450
Granted Patent B2
US 8,696,450 · App. 13/559,800 · Granted Apr 15, 2014

Methods for analyzing and providing feedback for improved power generation in a golf swing

Inventors: Jessica Rose (Palo Alto, CA); David W. Meister (Milwaukee, WI); Amy L. Ladd (Palo Alto, CA); Katherine M. Steele (Chicago, IL)
Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,696,450
App. No.
13/559,800
Granted
Apr 15, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

This invention relates to methods for optimizing a golf swing by measuring and providing feedback on a combination of various key parameters of a subject's movement to both generate more power and reduce injury.

Claims (27)

1. A method for analyzing a golf swing, comprising: measuring movement of a subject performing a golf swing using sensor elements; communicating the movement measurements to a computer-based analysis system; and using the computer-based analysis system to calculate values for at least four of the following parameters: peak X-factor, X-factor at impact, peak S-factor, S-factor at impact, peak O-factor and O-factor at impact, wherein X-factor is the relative difference between the rotation of the hips and the shoulders.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein values are calculated for at least one of the following additional parameters: clubhead speed at impact, clubhead height, upper torso rotation at impact, upper torso rotational velocity at impact, pelvic rotation at impact, pelvic rotational velocity at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity, peak pelvic rotation, and peak pelvic rotational velocity.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein values are calculated for at least three of clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein values are calculated for at least five of the parameters.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein values are calculated for at least one of the following additional parameters: clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein values are calculated for at least three of clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein values are calculated for at least six of the parameters.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein values are calculated for at least one of the following additional parameters: clubhead speed at impact, clubhead height, upper torso rotation at impact, upper torso rotational velocity at impact, pelvic rotation at impact, pelvic rotational velocity at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity, peak pelvic rotation, and peak pelvic rotational velocity.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein values are calculated for at least three of clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

10. A method for analyzing and improving a subject's golf swing comprising:

measuring movement of a subject performing a golf swing using sensor elements;

communicating the movement measurements to a computer-based analysis system;

using the computer-based analysis system to calculate values for at least four of the following parameters: peak X-factor, X-factor at impact, peak S-factor, S-factor at impact, peak O-factor and O-factor at impact, wherein X-factor is the relative difference between the rotation of the hips and the shoulders and

using the computer-based analysis system to compare the values of the measured parameters to target values for the parameters.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for at least one of the following additional parameters: clubhead speed at impact, clubhead height, upper torso rotation at impact, upper torso rotational velocity at impact, pelvic rotation at impact, pelvic rotational velocity at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity, peak pelvic rotation, and peak pelvic rotational velocity.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for at least three of clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for all of clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for at least five of the parameters.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for at least one of the following additional parameters: clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

16. The method of claim 10 , wherein values are calculated for at least six of the parameters.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for at least one of the following additional parameters: clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for at least three of clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein values are calculated and compared to target values for all of clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation.

20. A method for analyzing and improving a subject's golf swing comprising:

measuring movement of a subject performing a golf swing using sensor elements;

using the computer-based analysis system to calculate values for the following parameters: peak X-factor, X-factor at impact, peak S-factor, S-factor at impact, peak O-factor and O-factor at impact, clubhead speed at impact, peak free moment/mass, peak upper torso rotation, peak upper torso rotational velocity and peak pelvic rotation, wherein X-factor is the relative difference between the rotation of the hips and the shoulders; and

using the computer-based analysis system to compare the values of the measured parameters to target values for the parameters.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2012
From: ROSE, JESSICA; MEISTER, DAVID W.; LADD, AMY L.; STEELE, KATHERINE M.
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 028827/0988 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61512264 · Jul 27, 2011
Related Publication 20130029791A1 · Jan 31, 2013