IP Library Granted Patent US 9,136,943
Granted Patent B2
US 9,136,943 · App. 13/562,261 · Granted Sep 15, 2015

Method of characterizing impairments detected by equalization on a channel of a network

Inventors: Robert J. Thompson (Monroeton, PA); Charles S. Moore (Langhorne, PA); John L. Moran, III (Millville, MA); Marc L. Morrissette (Plainville, MA)
Assignee: ARRIS Technology, Inc.
H04B10/0795H04B3/46H04B10/2507H04B10/25751H04B10/66H04L25/03006
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,136,943
App. No.
13/562,261
Granted
Sep 15, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

An automated method of characterizing distortion detected by equalization on a channel of a network is provided. Equalization stress of an observed channel equalization response of an end device of the network is estimated, and equalization stress is calculated for a theoretical channel equalization response of the end device mathematically based on the observed channel equalization response and a theoretical removal of a suspected impairment from the network. The above referenced calculating step is separately repeated for each of a plurality of suspected impairments stored in a database of suspected impairments. A highest ranking suspected dominant impairment is determined from the database of suspected impairments such that removal of the highest ranking suspected dominant impairment from the network would provide a greatest reduction of equalization stress of a channel equalization response of the end device.

Claims (33)

1. An automated method of characterizing impairments detected by equalization on a channel of a network, comprising, in at least one processor:

estimating a first equalization stress of an observed channel equalization response of an end device of the network required for equalization;

calculating a second equalization stress of a channel equalization response of the end device mathematically based on the observed channel equalization response and a removal of a suspected impairment from the network;

repeating said calculating step separately for each of a plurality of suspected impairments stored in a database of suspected impairments; and

determining a highest ranking suspected dominant impairment from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide a greatest reduction of an equalization stress of a channel equalization response of the end device;

wherein equalization stress is measured by at least one metric selected from a group of metrics consisting of Main Tap Compression (MTC), Non Main Tap to Total Tap Energy Ratio (NMTTER), Pre Main Tap Energy Ratio (PreMTTER), Post Main Tap Energy Ratio (PostMTTER), Pre/Post Energy Symmetry Ratio (PPESR), and Pre/Post Tap Symmetry Ratio (PPTSR) wherein, during said determining step, an ordered series of next highest ranking suspected dominant impairments are identified from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide next greatest reductions of the equalization stress of the channel equalization response of the end device.

2. The automated method according to claim 1 , wherein, during said determining step, a next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment is identified from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide a next greatest reduction of equalization stress of the channel equalization response of the end device.

3. The automated method according to claim 2 , further comprising a step of determining a further modified channel equalization response from the observed channel equalization response assuming the highest ranking suspected dominant impairment and the next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment are removed from the network.

4. The automated method according to claim 1 , further comprising a step of determining a further modified channel equalization response from the observed channel equalization response assuming the highest ranking suspected dominant impairment, a next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment, and at least one additional next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment are removed from the network.

5. The automated method according to claim 1 , wherein said calculating step includes division of the observed channel equalization response by a known channel equalization response of the suspected impairment to produce the channel equalization response from which the equalization stress of the channel equalization response is determined.

6. The automated method according to claim 1 , wherein the database of suspected impairments includes a known impairment equalization response for each of the suspected impairments in the database.

7. The automated method according to claim 6 , further comprising a step of populating the database of suspected impairments with known impairment equalization responses obtained based on at least one of laboratory simulations and prior actual observations.

8. The automated method according to claim 1 , wherein said estimating, re-calculating, repeating, and determining steps are performed electronically with software.

9. An apparatus for characterizing impairments detected by equalization on a channel of a network, comprising:

one or more processors communicatively coupled to the network, wherein the network has a headend with a cable modem termination system (CMTS);

the one or more processors configured to estimate a first equalization stress of an observed channel equalization response of a cable modem of the network required for equalization;

the one or more processors further configured to calculate a second equalization stress of a channel equalization response of the cable modem mathematically based on the observed channel equalization response and a removal of a suspected impairment from the network;

the one or more processors further configured to repeat said calculating step separately for each of a plurality of suspected impairments stored in a database of suspected impairments; and

the one or more processors further configured to determine a highest ranking suspected dominant impairment from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide a greatest reduction of an equalization stress of a channel equalization response of the cable modem;

wherein a communication protocol used by the cable modem and CMTS for equalization is Data Over Cable System Interface Specification (DOCSIS), and a modulation scheme used by the network is quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM); and

wherein equalization stress is measured by at least one metric selected from a group of metrics consisting of Main Tap Compression (MTC), Non Main Tap to Total Tap Energy Ratio (NMTTER), Pre Main Tap Energy Ratio (PreMTTER), Post Main Tap Energy Ratio (PostMTTER), Pre/Post Energy Symmetry Ratio (PPESR), and Pre/Post Tap Symmetry Ratio (PPTSR) wherein, during said determining step, an ordered series of next highest ranking suspected dominant impairments are identified from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide next greatest reductions of the equalization stress of the channel equalization response of the end device.

10. At least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium having computer program instructions stored thereon that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform the following operations:

estimating a first equalization stress of an observed channel equalization response of an end device of a network;

calculating a second equalization stress of a channel equalization response of the end device mathematically based on the observed channel equalization response and a removal of a suspected impairment from the network;

repeating said calculating step separately for each of a plurality of suspected impairments stored in a database of suspected impairments; and

determining a highest ranking suspected dominant impairment from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide a greatest reduction of an equalization stress of a channel equalization response of the end device;

wherein equalization stress is measured by at least one metric selected from a group of metrics consisting of Main Tap Compression (MTC), Non Main Tap to Total Tap Energy Ratio (NMTTER), Pre Main Tap Energy Ratio (PreMTTER), Post Main Tap Energy Ratio (PostMTTER), Pre/Post Energy Symmetry Ratio (PPESR), and Pre/Post Tap Symmetry Ratio (PPTSR) wherein, during said determining step, an ordered series of next highest ranking suspected dominant impairments are identified from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide next greatest reductions of the equalization stress of the channel equalization response of the end device.

11. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 10 , wherein, during said determining operation, a next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment is identified from the database of suspected impairments that, if removed from the network, would provide a next greatest reduction of equalization stress of the channel equalization response of the end device.

12. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 11 , wherein the computer program instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to determine a further modified channel equalization response from the observed channel equalization response assuming the highest ranking suspected dominant impairment and the next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment are removed from the network.

13. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 10 , wherein the computer program instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to determine a further modified channel equalization response from the observed channel equalization response assuming the highest ranking suspected dominant impairment, a next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment, and at least one additional next highest ranking suspected dominant impairment are removed from the network.

14. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 10 , wherein the calculating operation includes division of the observed channel equalization response by a known channel equalization response of the suspected impairment to produce the channel equalization response from which the equalization stress of the channel equalization response is determined.

15. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 10 , wherein the database of suspected impairments includes a known impairment response for each of the suspected impairments in the database.

16. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 15 , wherein the computer program instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to populate the database of suspected impairments with known impairment responses.

Assignments (15)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2026
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; RUCKUS IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 075476/0814 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 049905/0504 Recorded Dec 19, 2024
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC (F/K/A ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.); ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; RUCKUS WIRELESS, LLC (F/K/A RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 071477/0255 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2024
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE INC., OF NORTH CAROLINA; OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC; RUCKUS IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC
Reel/Frame 069889/0114 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 060791/0583 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST
Reel/Frame 060752/0001 →
ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049892/0396 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 049820/0495 →
TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049905/0504 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 2, 2019
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 049649/0062 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Apr 8, 2019
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: ARRIS GROUP, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS KOREA, INC.; ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, INC.; BIG BAND NETWORKS, INC.; TEXSCAN CORPORATION; POWER GUARD, INC.; 4HOME, INC.; ACADIA AIC, INC.; AEROCAST, INC.; BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION; GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; IMEDIA CORPORATION; JERROLD DC RADIO, INC.; LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC.; MODULUS VIDEO, INC.; MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC.; NETOPIA, INC.; NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC.; QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; SETJAM, INC.; SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.; UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC.; GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC; GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC; CCE SOFTWARE LLC; THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996
Reel/Frame 048825/0294 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2015
From: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 037328/0341 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 10, 2015
From: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION; GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
To: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 035176/0620 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2013
From: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 030919/0697 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 28, 2013
From: ARRIS GROUP, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS KOREA, INC.; ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS; BIGBAND NETWORKS, INC.; TEXSCAN CORPORATION; POWER GUARD, INC.; 4HOME, INC.; ACADIA AIC, INC.; AEROCAST, INC.; BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION; GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; IMEDIA CORPORATION; JERROLD DC RADIO, INC.; LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC.; MODULUS VIDEO, INC.; MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC.; NETOPIA, INC.; NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC.; QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; SETJAM, INC.; SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.; UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC.; GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC; GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC; CCE SOFTWARE LLC; THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 030498/0023 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2012
From: THOMPSON, ROBERT J.; MOORE, CHARLES S.; MORAN, JOHN L.; MORRISSETTE, MARC L.
To: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 028679/0892 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20140029655A1 · Jan 30, 2014