IP Library Patent Application 13581603
Patent Application
App. No. 13/581,603

Methods and Systems for Identifying Customer Status for Developing Customer Retention and Loyality Strategies

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
13/581,603
Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods and systems for developing customer retention and loyalty strategies. In one aspect, a method comprises calculating ( 202 ) likelihoods of next action taken by customers, based on customer attributes and associated attribute weights stored in a customer data base, and calculating ( 203 ) customer churn-risk scores, based on customer attributes that vary over time using the computing device. The methods also determines ( 207 ) what-if-scenarios for each customer based on churn-risk scores in order to identify the next-best-action to reduce probability of customer churn, and determines ( 208 ) when-to-act time thresholds for each customer based on churn-risk scores in order to identify when a non-high risk customer of churning will likely become a high-risk customer of churning at some later time. The method also selects ( 209 ) customer retention and loyalty strategies for customers, based on the churn-risk scores, what-if-scenarios, and when-to-act time thresholds.

Claims (31)

1 . A method of identifying customer status for developing customer retention and loyalty strategies using a computing device, the method comprising:

calculating ( 202 ) likelihood of next action taken by customers based on customer attributes and associated attribute weights stored in a customer data base;

calculating ( 203 ) customer churn-risk scores based on customer attributes that vary over time using the computing device;

determining ( 207 ) what-if-scenarios for each customer based on churn-risk scores in order to identify the next-best-action to reduce probability of customer churn;

determining ( 208 ) when-to-act time thresholds for each customer based on churn-risk scores in order to identify when a non-high risk customer of churning will likely become a high-risk customer of churning at some later time; and

selecting ( 209 ) customer retention and loyalty strategies for customers based on the churn-risk scores, what-if-scenarios, and when-to-act time thresholds.

2 . The method of claim 1 further comprising preparing ( 201 ) customer data representing a number of actions taken by individual customers and customer attributes.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein preparing the customer data further comprises splitting the customer data into a training data set and test data set.

4 . The method of claim 1 further comprising:

comparing ( 204 ) likelihood of next action and churn-risk scores to likelihood of next action and churn-risk scores of a test data set of the customer data base; and

adjusting ( 206 ) parameters and repeating the steps of predicting likelihood of next action and computing customer churn-risk scores, when the method of claim 1 produces unacceptable results.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating ( 203 ) customer churn-risk scores further comprises calculating for each customer a churn-risk score based on the customer's last action date, last action number for assigning the customer to a particular stratum, s, weights of the attributes from the stratum s, and values of the attributes on the last action date.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the customer churn-risk score further comprises the probability of no action taken by the customer for a period of time.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining ( 207 ) what-if-scenarios for each customer further comprises creating a data set within the customer data where for each customer a hypothetical action of a certain type performed on a certain date is added to the customer data base and attribute values that depend on the hypothetical action are updated to reflect the change.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining ( 207 ) what-if-scenarios for each customer further comprises:

for each customer, computing a hypothetical churn-risk score as if the customer had performed an action of a certain type on a particular day; and

creating what-if-scenarios performed at different times in the future for combinations of actions based on the likelihood of the customer taking a certain type of action.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining ( 208 ) the when-to-act time thresholds further comprise computing when, from a date of analysis, a non-high risk customer of churning will likely become a high-risk customer of churning at some later time.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining ( 208 ) the when-to-act time thresholds further comprises determining the time from the date of analysis when the customer's churn-risk score is greater than a churn-risk threshold.

11 . An article comprising at least one computer readable medium having instructions executable by a computing device to perform a method of identifying customer status for developing customer retention and loyalty strategies, the method comprising:

calculating ( 202 ) likelihood of next action taken by customers based on customer attributes and associated attribute weights stored in a customer data base;

calculating ( 203 ) customer churn-risk scores based on customer attributes vary over time using the computing device;

determining ( 207 ) what-if-scenarios for each customer based on churn-risk scores in order to identify the next-best-action to reduce probability of customer churn;

determining ( 208 ) when-to-act time thresholds for each customer based on churn-risk scores in order to identify when a non-high risk customer of churning will likely become a high-risk customer of churning at some later time; and

selecting ( 209 ) customer retention and loyalty strategies for customers, based on the churn-risk scores, what-if-scenarios and when-to-act time thresholds.

12 . The article of claim 1 further comprising preparing ( 201 ) customer data representing a number of actions taken by individual customers and customer attributes.

13 . The article of claim 1 , wherein calculating ( 203 ) customer churn-risk scores further comprises calculating for each customer a churn-risk score based on the customer's last action date, last action number for assigning the customer to a particular stratum, s, weights of the attributes from the stratum s, and values of the attributes on the last action date.

14 . The article of claim 1 , wherein determining ( 207 ) what-if-scenarios for each customer further comprises:

for each customer, computing a hypothetical churn-risk score as if the customer had performed an action of a certain type on a particular day; and

creating what-if-scenarios performed at different times in the future for combinations of actions based on the likelihood of the customer taking a certain type of action.

15 . The article of claim 1 , wherein determining ( 208 ) the when-to-act time thresholds further comprises determining the time from the date of analysis when the customer's churn-risk score is greater than a churn-risk threshold.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2017
From: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
To: ENT. SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LP
Reel/Frame 041041/0716 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2015
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
To: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
Reel/Frame 037079/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2012
From: JAMAL, ZAINAB; TANG, HSIU-KHUERN
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 029198/0137 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2012
From: JAMAL, ZAINAB; TANG, HSIU-KHUERN
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 029028/0215 →