IP Library Granted Patent US 8,825,153
Granted Patent B2
US 8,825,153 · App. 13/590,633 · Granted Sep 2, 2014

Implantable system with inputs

Inventors: Scott Kokones (Boston, MA); Keith Carlton (Boston, MA); Alan Greszler (Bay Village, OH)
Assignee: Intelect Medical, Inc.
A61N1/37252A61B5/16A61B5/4094A61B5/224A61B5/0476A61B5/1127A61N1/37247A61N1/36082A61B5/6885A61B5/1121A61B5/1116
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,825,153
App. No.
13/590,633
Granted
Sep 2, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A stimulation system can have a first sensor to generate a first reading and a second sensor to generate a second reading. An analysis module of a programmer such as a patient programmer, which programs a stimulation signal to be delivered to a patient, conducts an evaluation of the patient based on the first and second readings. Evaluations may include determinations such as range of motion determinations, posture determinations, physical task-specific brain activity determinations, cognitive task-specific brain activity determinations, and brain activity-specific movement determinations.

Claims (111)

1. A stimulation system comprising:

a stimulation lead configured to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of a patient;

a first sensor to generate a first reading;

a second sensor to generate a second reading; and

at least one computer processor configured to:

compare the first reading to the second reading;

conduct an evaluation of the patient based on the comparison; and

based on the evaluation, modify a stimulation parameter according to which to perform the neuro-stimulation;

wherein at least one of:

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a posture of the patient, the first sensor is located at a burr hole cap, and the second sensor is located on an implantable pulse generator that triggers stimulation pulses of the stimulation lead; and

the first and second readings are simultaneously generated, the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a migration of the stimulation lead from a treatment site within the patient, and at least one of: (a) the first and second sensors are accelerometers and (b) the first sensor is disposed on the burr hole cap and the second sensor is disposed on the implantable pulse generator.

2. A stimulation system of claim 1 , comprising:

a stimulation lead configured to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of a patient;

a first sensor to generate a first reading;

a second sensor to generate a second reading; and

at least one computer processor configured to:

compare the first reading to the second reading;

conduct an evaluation of the patient based on the comparison; and

based on the evaluation, modify a stimulation parameter according to which to perform the neuro-stimulation;

wherein:

the stimulation system is configured to select at least one of a progress input question and a task instruction for presentation to the patient based on the evaluation; and

at least one of:

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a range of motion of which the patient is capable;

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a posture of the patient, the first sensor is located at a burr hole cap, and the second sensor is located on an implantable pulse generator that triggers stimulation pulses of the stimulation lead; and

the first and second readings are simultaneously generated, the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a migration of the stimulation lead from a treatment site within the patient, and at least one of: (a) the first and second sensors are accelerometers and (b) the first sensor is disposed on the burr hole cap and the second sensor is disposed on the implantable pulse generator.

3. The stimulation system of claim 1 , wherein:

the first and second readings are simultaneously generated;

the evaluation includes the determination, based on the comparison, of a migration of the stimulation lead from the treatment site within the patient;

the first and second sensors are accelerometers; and

the first sensor is on the stimulation lead.

4. The stimulation system of claim 3 , wherein the stimulation system includes at least one of the implantable pulse generator and an external pulse generator in communication with the stimulation lead.

5. A stimulation system of claim 1 , comprising:

a stimulation lead configured to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of a patient;

a first sensor to generate a first reading;

a second sensor to generate a second reading; and

at least one computer processor configured to:

compare the first reading to the second reading;

conduct an evaluation of the patient based on the comparison; and

based on the evaluation, modify a stimulation parameter according to which to perform the neuro-stimulation;

wherein:

the evaluation is conducted by a processor disposed within at least one of a patient programmer remote control configured for receiving user-input of stimulation parameter changes, a clinician programmer device configured for receiving user-input of stimulation parameter changes, an implantable pulse generator configured to trigger stimulation pulses of the stimulation lead, and an external pulse generator configured to trigger stimulation pulses of the stimulation lead; and

at least one of:

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a range of motion of which the patient is capable;

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a posture of the patient, the first sensor is located at a burr hole cap, and the second sensor is located on the implantable pulse generator; and

the first and second readings are simultaneously generated, the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a migration of the stimulation lead from a treatment site within the patient, and at least one of: (a) the first and second sensors are accelerometers and (b) the first sensor is disposed on the burr hole cap and the second sensor is disposed on the implantable pulse generator.

6. The stimulation system of claim 5 , wherein:

the evaluation includes the determination, based on the comparison, of the range of motion of which the patient is capable; and

at least one of the first and second sensors is coupled to the patient programmer remote control.

7. The stimulation system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first and second sensors is an accelerometer.

8. The stimulation system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to store data relating to the evaluation to a memory of the stimulation system.

9. The stimulation system of claim 1 , wherein the comparison is performed to obtain a relative measurement of simultaneous motion, the evaluation being based on the relative measurement.

10. The stimulation system of claim 1 , wherein:

the evaluation includes at least one of the posture determination and the lead migration determination;

the first sensor is disposed on the burr hole cap; and

the second sensor is disposed on the implantable pulse generator.

11. A stimulation system comprising:

a stimulation lead configured to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of a patient;

a burr hole cap for the stimulation lead;

a first accelerometer, on the stimulation lead, to generate a first reading;

a second accelerometer to generate a second reading simultaneously with the generation of the first reading; and

at least one computer processor configured to:

compare the first reading to the second reading;

determine, based on the comparison, a migration of the stimulation lead from a treatment site within the patient; and

based on the determination, modify a stimulation parameter according to which to perform the neuro-stimulation.

12. A method of operating a stimulation system comprising:

transmitting a first reading from a first sensor to an analysis module of the stimulation system;

transmitting a second reading from a second sensor to the analysis module;

comparing, by a computer processor, the first reading to the second reading;

conducting, by the processor, an evaluation of a patient based on the comparison; and

based on the evaluation, modifying, by the processor, a stimulation parameter according to which to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of the patient using a stimulation lead;

wherein at least one of:

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a posture of the patient, the first sensor is located at a burr hole cap, and the second sensor is located on an implantable pulse generator that triggers stimulation pulses of the stimulation lead; and

the first and second readings are simultaneously generated, the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a migration of the stimulation lead from a treatment site within the patient, and at least one of: (a) the first and second sensors are accelerometers and (b) the first sensor is disposed on the burr hole cap and the second sensor is disposed on the implantable pulse generator.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein at least one of the first and second sensors is an accelerometer.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the comparison is performed to obtain a relative measurement of simultaneous motion, the evaluation being based on the relative measurement.

15. A method of operating a stimulation system, the method comprising:

transmitting a first reading from a first sensor to an analysis module of the stimulation system;

transmitting a second reading from a second sensor to the analysis module;

comparing, by a computer processor, the first reading to the second reading;

conducting, by the processor, an evaluation of a patient based on the comparison; and

based on the evaluation:

selecting at least one of a progress input question and a task instruction for presentation to the patient; and

modifying, by the processor, a stimulation parameter according to which to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of the patient using a stimulation lead;

wherein at least one of:

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a range of motion of which the patient is capable;

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a posture of the patient, the first sensor is located at a burr hole cap, and the second sensor is located on an implantable pulse generator that triggers stimulation pulses of the stimulation lead; and

the first and second readings are simultaneously generated, the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a migration of the stimulation lead from a treatment site within the patient, and at least one of: (a) the first and second sensors are accelerometers and (b) the first sensor is disposed on the burr hole cap and the second sensor is disposed on the implantable pulse generator.

16. A method of operating a deep brain stimulation system, the method comprising:

transmitting a first reading from a first sensor to an analysis module of the stimulation system;

transmitting a second reading from a second sensor, included one of on and in an implantable pulse generator, to the analysis module;

comparing, by a computer processor, the first reading to the second reading;

conducting, by the processor, an evaluation of a patient based on the comparison;

based on the evaluation, modifying, by the processor, a stimulation parameter according to which to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of the patient using a stimulation lead;

generating a pulse trigger signal by the implantable pulse generator;

transmitting the pulse trigger signal to the stimulation lead via a stimulation extension; and

performing the neuro-stimulation at the treatment site by the stimulation lead based on the pulse trigger;

wherein at least one of:

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a range of motion of which the patient is capable;

the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a posture of the patient and the first sensor is located at a burr hole cap; and

the first and second readings are simultaneously generated, the evaluation includes a determination, based on the comparison, of a migration of the stimulation lead from a treatment site within the patient, and at least one of: (a) the first and second sensors are accelerometers, and (b) the first sensor is disposed on the burr hole cap.

17. The method of claim 16 , further including selecting at least one of a progress input question and a task instruction for presentation to the patient based on the evaluation.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein at least one the first and second sensors is an accelerometer.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein the processor is disposed within at least one of a patient programmer remote control configured for receiving user-input of stimulation parameter changes, a clinician programmer device configured for receiving user-input of stimulation parameter changes, the implantable pulse generator and an external pulse generator.

20. A stimulation system comprising:

a stimulation lead configured to perform a neuro-stimulation of an anatomical region of a patient;

a first sensor to generate a first reading, the first sensor being disposed one of on and in a patient programmer remote control that is configured for obtaining user input of stimulation parameter modifications and for controlling the stimulation lead in accordance with the user input stimulation parameter modifications;

a second sensor to generate a second reading, the second sensor being disposed one of on and in an implantable pulse generator that triggers stimulation pulses of the stimulation lead; and

at least one computer processor configured to:

compare the first reading to the second reading;

determine, based on the comparison, a range of motion of which the patient is capable; and

based on the determination, modify a stimulation parameter according to which to perform the neuro-stimulation.

Assignments (2)
MERGER Recorded Jun 10, 2024
From: INTELECT MEDICAL, INC.
To: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067670/0169 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2012
From: KOKONES, SCOTT; CARLTON, KEITH; GRESZLER, ALAN
To: INTELECT MEDICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 028821/0833 →
Continuity (2)
Division 11871468 · Oct 12, 2007
Related Publication 20120316616A1 · Dec 13, 2012