IP Library Granted Patent US 8,600,383
Granted Patent B2
US 8,600,383 · App. 13/617,241 · Granted Dec 3, 2013

Apparatus and method for making measurements in mobile telecommunications system user equipment

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,600,383
App. No.
13/617,241
Granted
Dec 3, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for selecting cells in a mobile telecommunications system, the system comprising a network of a plurality of cells of a Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS) and a network of a plurality of cells of a second Radio Access Technology (RAT), the method comprising, at a user equipment device: when in UMTS mode, flagging in a neighboring cell list stored on the user equipment device information for a cell of a second RAT which is known to be unsuitable for selection. Information from the neighboring cell list information for the flagged cell may be removed, in particular for a limited period of time.

Claims (128)

1. A method of cell reselection by a user equipment device (UE), the UE operable with a first cellular Radio Access Technology (RAT) and a second cellular RAT, the method comprising:

when the UE is camped on a cell of the first RAT, determining whether a cell of a second RAT is suitable for camping,

the UE not considering said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection if said cell of the second RAT is not suitable for camping, and further not considering said cell of the second RAT for a time period.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising considering said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection after expiry of the time period.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein not considering said cell of the second RAT comprises removing said cell from a list of neighboring cells.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein not considering said cell of the second RAT comprises flagging said cell in a list of neighboring cells as being unsuitable for camping.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable when it is barred.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of barred cells.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of unsuitable cells.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to belonging to a public land mobile network (PLMN) that is not the same as a PLMN selected by the UE.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the time period is a maximum of 300 seconds.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the time period is 300 seconds.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the time period is a defined period of time.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the time period is a limited period of time.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the UE receives a list of neighboring cells including the cell of the second RAT.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first RAT is selected from a group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA; and the second RAT is different from the first RAT and selected from the group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reselection is for camping.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether a cell of a second RAT is suitable for camping comprises:

generating measurement data for cells in a neighboring cell list;

identifying from the measurement data a cell that meets a cell reselection criterion; and

determining whether the identified cell is suitable for camping when the identified cell is a cell of the second RAT.

17. A user equipment device (UE) configured to be operable with a first cellular Radio Access Technology (RAT) and a second cellular RAT, the UE comprising:

a processor and memory, the UE being operable so that, when the UE is camped on a cell of the first RAT, it is determined whether a cell of a second RAT is suitable for camping,

wherein the UE does not consider said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection if said cell of the second RAT is not suitable for camping, and further does not consider said cell of the second RAT for a time period.

18. The UE according to claim 17 , further configured to consider said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection after expiry of the time period.

19. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein, in order to not consider said cell of the second RAT, the UE is configured to remove said cell from a list of neighboring cells.

20. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein, in order to not consider said cell of the second RAT, the UE is arranged to flag said cell in a list of neighboring cells as being unsuitable for selection.

21. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein said cell of a second RAT is not suitable when it is barred.

22. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein said cell of a second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of barred cells.

23. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein said cell of a second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of unsuitable cells.

24. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein said cell of a second RAT is not suitable due to belonging to a public land mobile network (PLMN) that is not to the same as a PLMN selected by the UE.

25. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein the time period is a maximum of 300 seconds.

26. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein the time period is 300 seconds.

27. The UE according to claim 17 , wherein the time period is a defined period of time.

28. The UE according to claim 17 , further configured to receive a list of neighboring cells including the cell of the second RAT.

29. The UE of claim 17 , wherein the first RAT is selected from a group including UMTS, GSM, GPRS or CDMA; and the second RAT is different from the first RAT and selected from the group including UMTS, GSM, GPRS, or CDMA.

30. The UE of claim 17 , wherein the reselection is for camping.

31. The UE of claim 17 , further operable to:

generate measurement data for cells in a neighboring cell list;

identify from the measurement data a cell that meets a cell reselection criterion; and

determine whether the identified cell is suitable for camping when the identified cell is a cell of the second RAT.

32. A method of cell reselection by a user equipment device (UE), the UE operable with a first cellular Radio Access Technology (RAT) and a second cellular RAT, the method comprising:

when the UE is camped on a cell of the first RAT,

the UE considering a cell of a second RAT as barred as a candidate for reselection for a time period if said cell of the second RAT is not suitable for camping.

33. The method according to claim 32 , further comprising determining whether said cell of the second RAT is suitable for camping.

34. The method according to claim 32 , further comprising considering said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection after expiry of the time period.

35. The method according to claim 32 , wherein considering said cell of the second RAT as barred comprises removing said cell from a list of neighboring cells.

36. The method according to claim 32 , wherein considering said cell of the second RAT as barred comprises flagging said cell in a list of neighboring cells as being unsuitable for camping.

37. The method according to claim 32 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable when it is barred.

38. The method according to claim 32 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of barred cells.

39. The method according to claim 32 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of unsuitable cells.

40. The method according to claim 32 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to belonging to a public land mobile network (PLMN) that is not the same as a PLMN selected by the UE.

41. The method according to claim 32 , wherein the time period is a maximum of 300 seconds.

42. The method according to claim 32 , wherein the time period is 300 seconds.

43. The method according to claim 32 , wherein the time period is a defined period of time.

44. The method according to claim 32 , wherein the time period is a limited period of time.

45. The method according to claim 32 , wherein the UE receives a list of neighboring cells including the cell of the second RAT.

46. The method of claim 32 , wherein the first RAT is selected from a group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA; and the second RAT is different from the first RAT and selected from the group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA.

47. The method of claim 32 , wherein the reselection is for camping.

48. The method of claim 32 , further comprising:

generating measurement data for the cells in a neighboring cell list;

identifying from the measurement data a cell that meets a cell reselection criterion; and

determining whether the identified cell is suitable for camping when the identified cell is a cell of the second RAT.

49. A user equipment device (UE) configured to be operable with a first cellular Radio Access Technology (RAT) and a second cellular RAT, the UE comprising:

a processor and memory, the UE being operable so that, when the UE is camped on a cell of the first RAT,

the UE considers a cell of a second RAT as barred as a candidate for reselection for a time period if said cell of the second RAT is not suitable for camping.

50. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein the UE is configured to determine whether said cell of the second RAT is suitable for camping.

51. The UE according to claim 49 , further configured to consider said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection after expiry of the time period.

52. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein, in order to consider said cell of the second RAT as barred, the UE is configured to remove said cell from a list of neighboring cells.

53. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein, in order to consider said cell of the second RAT as barred, the UE is arranged to flag said cell in a list of neighboring cells as being unsuitable for camping.

54. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable when it is barred.

55. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of barred cells.

56. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of unsuitable cells.

57. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to belonging to a public land mobile network (PLMN) that is not the same as a PLMN selected by the UE.

58. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein the time period is a maximum of 300 seconds.

59. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein the time period is 300 seconds.

60. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein the time period is a defined period of time.

61. The UE according to claim 49 , wherein the time period is a limited period of time.

62. The UE according to claim 49 , further configured to receive a list of neighboring cells including the cell of the second RAT.

63. The UE of claim 49 , wherein the first RAT is selected from a group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA; and the second RAT is different from the first RAT and selected from the group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA.

64. The UE of claim 49 , wherein the reselection is for camping.

65. The UE of claim 49 , further operable to:

generate measurement data for the cells in a neighboring cell list;

identify from the measurement data a cell that meets a cell reselection criterion; and

determine whether the identified cell is suitable for camping when the identified cell is a cell of the second RAT.

66. A method of cell reselection by a user equipment device (UE), the UE operable with a first cellular Radio Access Technology (RAT) and a second cellular RAT, the method comprising:

when the UE is camped on a cell of the first RAT,

determining whether a cell of a second RAT is suitable for camping,

the UE excluding said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection for a time period if said cell of the second RAT is not suitable for camping.

67. The method according to claim 66 , further comprising considering said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection after expiry of the time period.

68. The method according to claim 66 , wherein excluding said cell of the second RAT comprises removing said cell from a list of neighboring cells.

69. The method according to claim 66 , wherein excluding said cell of the second RAT comprises flagging said cell in a list of neighboring cells as being unsuitable for camping.

70. The method according to claim 66 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable when it is barred.

71. The method according to claim 66 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of barred cells.

72. The method according to claim 66 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of unsuitable cells.

73. The method according to claim 66 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to belonging to a public land mobile network (PLMN) that is not the same as a PLMN selected by the UE.

74. The method according to claim 66 , wherein the time period is a maximum of 300 seconds.

75. The method according to claim 66 , wherein the time period is 300 seconds.

76. The method according to claim 66 , wherein the time period is a defined period of time.

77. The method according to claim 66 , wherein the time period is a limited period of time.

78. The method according to claim 66 , wherein the UE receives a list of neighboring cells including the cell of the second RAT.

79. The method of claim 66 , wherein the first RAT is selected from a group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA; and the second RAT is different from the first RAT and selected from the group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA.

80. The method of claim 66 , wherein the reselection is for camping.

81. The method of claim 66 , wherein determining whether a cell of a second RAT is suitable for camping comprises:

generating measurement data for cells in a neighboring cell list;

identifying from the measurement data a cell that meets a cell camping criterion; and

determining whether the identified cell is suitable for camping when the identified cell is a cell of the second RAT.

82. A user equipment device (UE) configured to be operable with a first cellular Radio Access Technology (RAT) and a second cellular RAT, the UE comprising:

a processor and memory, the UE being operable so that, when the UE is camped on a cell of the first RAT, it is determined whether a cell of a second RAT is suitable for camping,

wherein the UE excludes said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection for a time period if said cell of the second RAT is not suitable for camping.

83. The UE according to claim 82 , further configured to consider said cell of the second RAT as a candidate for reselection after expiry of the time period.

84. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein, in order to exclude said cell of the second RAT, the UE is configured to remove said cell from a list of neighboring cells.

85. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein, in order to exclude said cell of the second RAT, the UE is arranged to flag said cell in a list of neighboring cells as being unsuitable for camping.

86. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable when it is barred.

87. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of barred cells.

88. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to being part of a list of unsuitable cells.

89. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein said cell of the second RAT is not suitable due to belonging to a public land mobile network (PLMN) that is not the same as a PLMN selected by the UE.

90. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein the time period is a maximum of 300 seconds.

91. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein the time period is 300 seconds.

92. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein the time period is a defined period of time.

93. The UE according to claim 82 , wherein the time period is a limited period of time.

94. The UE according to claim 82 , further configured to receive a list of neighboring cells including the cell of the second RAT.

95. The UE of claim 82 , wherein the first RAT is selected from a group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA; and the second RAT is different from the first RAT and selected from the group including UMTS, GSM, or CDMA.

96. The UE of claim 82 , wherein the reselection is for camping.

97. The UE of claim 82 , further operable to:

generate measurement data for cells in a neighboring cell list;

identify from the measurement data a cell that meets a cell reselection criterion; and

determine whether the identified cell is suitable for camping when the identified cell is a cell of the second RAT.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2019
From: SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A.
To: 3G LICENSING S.A.
Reel/Frame 049750/0043 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 5, 2019
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
To: SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A.
Reel/Frame 049674/0758 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 5, 2019
From: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 049679/0457 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 28, 2013
From: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED
To: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
Reel/Frame 031506/0403 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 3, 2012
From: ROBERTS, GIDEON; HARRISON, ROBERT; GEORGE, RICHARD; DE JONG, GJALT
To: M-STACK LIMITED
Reel/Frame 029070/0145 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 3, 2012
From: M-STACK LIMITED
To: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED
Reel/Frame 029070/0284 →