Method and system for addressing interference between co-existing radios of differing radio access technologies
View Patent ↗Methods and systems for addressing interference between co-existing radios of differing radio access technologies (RATs) are provided. One RAT radio send an indication to a second RAT radio when it is transmitting, but does so after determining there is an actual likelihood that the first RAT transmission will interfere with reception by the second RAT radio. Optionally, the second RAT radio makes its own determination of whether there is a likelihood of interference, and ignores the indication if it is determined interference is not likely. Alternatively, the second RAT radio sends an indication to the first RAT radio when it is receiving, only after determining there is a likelihood that first RAT transmissions will interfere with reception by the second RAT radio.
1. A method in a device comprising a first RAT (radio access technology) radio and a second RAT radio, the method comprising:
determining whether or not a transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio based on at least one interference criterion;
when it has been determined that the transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio, transmitting an indication from the first RAT radio to the second RAT radio to indicate that the first RAT radio is transmitting;
if the second RAT radio is operating on a potentially effected frequency, adjusting receiver processing when the indication from the first RAT radio to the second RAT radio to indicate that the first RAT radio is transmitting is received;
if the second RAT radio is not operating on a potentially effected frequency when the indication from the first RAT radio to the second RAT radio to indicate that the first RAT radio is transmitting is received, ignoring the indication.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said determining is performed by the first RAT radio, the method further comprising:
the second RAT radio making a determination of whether or not a transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio based on at least one interference criterion;
if it is determined by the second RAT radio that the transmission from the first RAT radio is not expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio, ignoring the indication received from the first RAT radio.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one interference criterion comprises at least one of:
first RAT output power;
first RAT transmission bandwidth;
frequency separation between first RAT frequency band and second RAT frequency band.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one interference criterion comprises a requirement that the first RAT output power be greater than a threshold.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one interference criterion comprises a requirement that the first RAT output power be greater than a threshold, wherein the threshold that is applied is varied as a function of transmission bandwidth.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one interference criterion comprises a requirement that the first RAT output power be greater than a threshold, wherein the threshold is defined as a function of transmission bandwidth and frequency separation between a first RAT frequency band and a second RAT frequency band.
7. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
the second RAT radio generating an indication to the first RAT radio when an unacceptable level of interference is detected;
defining at least one criterion based on the indication generated by the second RAT radio.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
the second RAT radio adjusting receiver processing when the indication from the first RAT radio to the second RAT radio to indicate that the first RAT radio is transmitting is received.
9. A method in a device comprising a first RAT radio and a second RAT radio, the method comprising:
determining whether or not a transmission from the first RAT is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio based on at least one interference criterion;
when it has been determined that the transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio, transmitting an indication from the second RAT radio to the first RAT radio to indicate that the second RAT radio is receiving;
if the first RAT radio is operating on a potentially effected frequency, limiting transmit power when the indication from the second RAT radio to the first RAT radio to indicate that the second RAT radio is receiving is received;
if the first RAT radio is not operating on a potentially effected frequency when the indication from the second RAT radio to the first RAT radio to indicate that the second RAT radio is receiving is received, ignoring the indication.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the at least one interference criterion comprises at least one of:
first RAT output power;
first RAT transmission bandwidth;
frequency separation between first RAT frequency band and second RAT frequency band.
11. The method of claim 9 wherein the at least one interference criterion comprises a requirement that the first RAT output power be greater than a threshold.
12. The method of claim 9 wherein the at least one interference criterion comprises a requirement that the first RAT output power be greater than a threshold, wherein the threshold that is applied is varied as a function of transmission bandwidth.
13. The method of claim 9 wherein at least one interference criterion comprises a requirement that the first RAT output power be greater than a threshold, wherein the threshold is defined as a function of transmission bandwidth and frequency separation between a first RAT frequency band and a second RAT frequency band.
14. The method of claim 9 further comprising:
the first RAT radio limiting transmit power when the indication from the second RAT radio to the first RAT radio to indicate that the second RAT radio is receiving is received.
15. The method of claim 9 wherein the first RAT radio is an LTE radio and the second RAT radio is a Wi-Fi radio or a Bluetooth radio.
16. A method in a device comprising a first RAT radio and a second RAT radio, the method comprising:
the second RAT radio receiving an indication from the first RAT radio indicating that the first RAT radio is transmitting;
the second RAT radio determining whether or not a transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to the second RAT radio based on at least one interference criterion;
if it is determined that the transmission from the first RAT radio is not expected to cause interference to the second RAT radio, ignoring the indication.
17. The method of claim 16 further comprising:
if it is determined that the transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to the second RAT radio, modifying receiver processing in the second RAT radio.
18. A communications device comprising:
a first RAT (radio access technology) radio;
a second RAT radio comprising:
a transmitter;
a first processor; and
a first interference determiner configured to determine whether or not a transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio based on at least one interference criterion;
wherein the first processor is configured to transmit via the transmitter an indication from the first RAT radio to the second RAT radio to indicate that the first RAT radio is transmitting only when the first interference determiner has determined that the transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio.
19. The communications device of claim 18 wherein the first RAT radio comprises said first interference determiner;
the second RAT radio further comprises a second processor and a second interference determiner configured to determine whether or not a transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio based on at least one interference criterion;
wherein the second processor is configured to ignore the indication received from the first RAT radio when the second interference determiner determines that the transmission from the first RAT radio is not expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio.
20. A communications device comprising:
a first RAT (radio access technology) radio;
a second RAT radio comprising:
a transmitter;
a processor; and
an interference determiner configured to determine whether or not a transmission from the first RAT is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio based on at least one interference criterion;
wherein the processor is configured to transmit via the transmitter an indication from the second RAT radio to the first RAT radio to indicate that the second RAT radio is receiving when the interference determiner has determined that the transmission from the first RAT radio is expected to cause interference to reception by the second RAT radio.