Method for testing hearing aids
A method for testing hearing aids, particularly in respect of the effect thereof on speech comprehension, is improved. The method has the following steps: a) a test system is provided, b) an audible voice signal in the form of at least one meaningless syllable is selected and presented c) the meaningless syllable and a number of further meaningless syllables are displayed on a graphical user interface in the test system, d) a heard meaningless syllable is selected from the displayed meaningless syllables by the user, e) the selection made is evaluated, and f) method steps c) to e) are repeated until a termination criterion is encountered. The audible voice signal is selected in each case on the basis of at least one selection made by the person in response to a previously presented voice signal. The method allows particularly fast and informative hearing aid tests.
1. A method for testing speech comprehension of a person assisted by a hearing aid, which comprises the following steps of:
a) providing a test system;
b) selecting and presenting an acoustic voice signal in a form of at least one meaningless syllable and superimposing a fluctuating interference signal on the acoustic voice signal, the acoustic voice signal being presented in a region of a minimum fluctuating noise interference;
c) displaying the meaningless syllable and a number of further meaningless syllables on a graphical user interface of the test system;
d) selecting, via the person, a heard meaningless syllable from displayed meaningless syllables;
e) evaluating a selection made; and
f) repeating the method steps c) to e) until a termination criterion is reached, the selection of the acoustic voice signal being made in each instance in dependence on at least one selection made by the person in response to a previously presented voice signal.
2. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises performing at least one of a selection or a presentation of at least one of the acoustic voice signal or of the interference signal to repeat the method steps c) to f) in dependence on an evaluation of the selection made by the person in relation to at least one previous round of the method steps c) to f).
3. The method according to claim 2 , which further comprises adjusting a signal to noise ratio between the acoustic voice signal and the interference signal.
4. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises adjusting a degree of similarity between the meaningless syllable selected and the further meaningless syllables.
5. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises using noise as the interference signal.