IP Library Granted Patent US 9,612,922
Granted Patent B2
US 9,612,922 · App. 13/638,438 · Granted Apr 4, 2017

Computer system and method for comparing output signals

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,612,922
App. No.
13/638,438
Granted
Apr 4, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer system includes at least two COTS processor cores and an evaluating device connected to the at least two COTS processor cores for evaluating output signals output by means of the at least two COTS processor cores. The evaluating device includes a comparator for pair-wise comparison of the respective generated output signals with each other. The comparator also outputs a comparison signal corresponding to the respective comparison of the output signals.

Claims (25)

1. A computer system, comprising:

at least three commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processor cores; and

an evaluation device, which is connected to the at least three COTS processor cores, the evaluation device is configured to evaluate output signals that are output from the at least three COTS processor cores, wherein the evaluation device includes a comparator configured to compare a relocatable group of the output signals that are output with one another in pairs, wherein the comparator of the evaluation device is also configured to output a comparison signal that corresponds to the respective comparison of the relocatable group of the output signals, and wherein

at least one of the COTS processor cores is different than the other COTS processor cores,

a selection device, connected to the comparator of the evaluation device, configured to select an output signal for further processing based on the comparison signal,

the at least three COTS processor cores each comprise a corresponding comparator to compare non-relocatable output signals of the output signals with one another, and

the computer system further comprises a switching device that is connected between the COTS processor cores and the comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the switching device is configured to transmit the relocatable group of the output signals to the comparator of the evaluation device on the basis of a utilization state of the comparator of the evaluation device.

2. The computer system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the selection device and the evaluation device are integrated in a logic circuit device.

3. The computer system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the at least three COTS processor cores are each formed as a logical COTS processor core or as a physical COTS processor core.

4. The computer system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a network-on-a-chip is connected to the COTS processor cores.

5. A method for comparing output signals that are output by at least three commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processor cores, wherein the COTS processor cores each comprise a comparator to compare a non-relocatable group of the output signals with one other and at least one of the COTS processor cores is different than the other COTS processor cores, comprising the following steps:

transmitting a relocatable group of the output signals of the COTS processor cores, to an evaluation device that includes a further comparator;

comparing, by the further comparator of the evaluation device, the relocatable group of the transmitted output signals with one another in pairs; and

outputting, by the further comparator of the evaluation device, a comparison signal that corresponds to the respective comparison of the relocatable group of output signals,

transmitting the comparison signal to a selection device that is connected to the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the selection device selects an output signal for further processing based on the transmitted comparison signal, and

transmitting the relocatable group of the output signals by a switching device that is connected between the COTS processor cores and the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the switching device is configured to transmit the relocatable group of the output signals to the further comparator of the evaluation device on the basis of a utilization state of the further comparator of the evaluation device.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein three output signals are classified as the same if respective parameters from the output signals are within a predetermined error tolerance range.

7. A computer program stored on a non-transitory storage medium, the computer program having program code for:

receiving output signals of at least three commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processor cores, wherein the COTS processor cores each comprise a comparator to compare a non-relocatable group of the output signals with one other and at least one of the COTS processor cores is different than the other COTS processor cores;

comparing, by a further comparator of an evaluation device, a relocatable group of the transmitted output signals with one another in pairs;

outputting, by the further comparator of the evaluation device, a comparison signal that corresponds to the respective comparison of the relocatable group of the output signals;

transmitting the comparison signal to a selection device that is connected to the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the selection device selects an output signal for further processing based on the transmitted comparison signal; and

transmitting the relocatable group of the output signals by a switching device that is connected between the COTS processor cores and the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the switching device is configured to transmit the relocatable group of the output signals to the further comparator of the evaluation device on the basis of a utilization state of the further comparator of the evaluation device.

8. The computer program as claimed in claim 7 , wherein three output signals are classified as the same if respective parameters from the output signals are within a predetermined error tolerance range.

9. The method of claim 5 , further comprising classifying three of the output signals as the same if respective parameters from such output signals are within a predefined error tolerance range.

Assignments (6)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENT NUMBER FROM 9476976 TO 9476967 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 48284 FRAME: 766. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Apr 15, 2020
From: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH
To: HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH
Reel/Frame 052534/0259 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENT NUMBER PAT. NO.9476976 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 047691 FRAME 0890. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Recorded Jun 18, 2019
From: AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE GMBH
To: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 049499/0724 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 7, 2019
From: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH
To: HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH
Reel/Frame 048284/0766 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2018
From: AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE GMBH
To: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 047691/0890 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 19, 2016
From: EADS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
To: AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE GMBH
Reel/Frame 040418/0890 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2012
From: GEIGER, DIETMAR; PAULITSCH, MICHAEL
To: EADS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Reel/Frame 029265/0544 →