IP Library Granted Patent US 8,576,745
Granted Patent B2
US 8,576,745 · App. 13/648,678 · Granted Nov 5, 2013

System and method for enhanced physical layer device autonegotiation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,576,745
App. No.
13/648,678
Granted
Nov 5, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for enhanced physical layer device autonegotiation. The autonegotiation process typically identifies the highest common denominator amongst various standardized modes of operation. Enhanced autonegotiation can be used to select a mode of operation that is not the highest common denominator. Enhanced autonegotiation can also identify a non-standardized mode of operation using next page messaging, additional physical signaling, or Layer 2 messaging.

Claims (19)

1. A method, comprising:

transmitting, from a first Ethernet device to a second Ethernet device, first signals that indicate a capability of said first Ethernet device to support a short reach mode of operation that is configured for link distances up to a maximum link distance that is less than 100 meters or a long reach mode of operation that is configured for link distances up to a maximum link distance that is greater than 100 meters;

receiving, from said second Ethernet device, second signals that indicate a capability of said second Ethernet device to support said short reach mode of operation or said long reach mode of operation; and

selecting, by said first Ethernet device based on said received second signals, one of said short reach mode of operation or said long reach mode of operation for use by said first Ethernet device.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said transmitting comprises transmitting after transmitting messages that indicate 10/100/1000 capabilities of said first Ethernet device.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said selecting comprises selecting a mode of operation having a link transmission rate that is greater than 10 Mbit/s and less than 100 Mbit/s, greater than 100 Mbit/s and less than 1 Gbit/s, or greater than than 1 Gbit/s and less than 10 Gbit/s.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said selecting comprises selecting a symmetric mode of operation.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said selecting comprises selecting an asymmetric mode of operation.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said transmitting comprises transmitting an autonegotiation next page message.

7. A method, comprising:

transitioning, based on a successful completion of a negotiation process between a first Ethernet device and a second Ethernet device, said first Ethernet device to a base mode of operation to facilitate communication between said first Ethernet device and said second Ethernet device;

transmitting, by said first Ethernet device to said second Ethernet device, additional signals that include information that identifies support by said first Ethernet device of a second mode of operation different from said base mode of operation; and

upon a determination that said second Ethernet device also supports said second mode of operation, transitioning said first Ethernet device from said base mode of operation to said second mode of operation.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising identifying said base mode of operation using one or more autonegotiation messages.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein said transmitting comprises transmitting Layer 2 messages.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein said second mode of operation has a link transmission rate that is greater than 10 Mbit/s and less than 100 Mbit/s, greater than 100 Mbit/s and less than 1 Gbit/s, or greater than 1 Gbit/s and less than 10 Gbit/s.

11. The method of claim 7 , wherein said second mode of operation is a short-reach mode of operation designed for link distances up to a maximum link distance that is less than 100 meters.

12. The method of claim 7 , wherein said second mode of operation is a long-reach mode of operation designed for link distances up to a maximum link distance that is greater than 100 meters.

13. The method of claim 7 , wherein said second mode of operation is an asymmetric mode of operation.

Assignments (7)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ERROR IN RECORDING THE MERGER IN THE INCORRECT US PATENT NO. 8,876,094 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 047351 FRAME 0384. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER. Recorded Mar 8, 2019
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 049248/0558 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE MERGER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 047230 FRAME: 0910. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER. Recorded Oct 29, 2018
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 047351/0384 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 4, 2018
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 047230/0910 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Feb 3, 2017
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041712/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 041706/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037806/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2012
From: DIAB, WAEL WILLIAM; POWELL, SCOTT; KIM, YONG
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029105/0823 →