IP Library Granted Patent US 9,037,443
Granted Patent B1
US 9,037,443 · App. 13/653,359 · Granted May 19, 2015

Systems and methods for solar power equipment

Inventors: John R. Meyer (Bellingham, WA); Gordon H. Petroski (North Delta, CA)
Assignee: Alpha Technologies Inc.
F03G6/001H01L31/046
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,037,443
App. No.
13/653,359
Granted
May 19, 2015
Kind
B1
Abstract

A design system for generating a power equipment proposal for a particular location, comprises an insolation database, a load database, and a processing system. The insolation database comprises insolation values associated with a plurality of geographic data points. The load database associates appropriate power equipment with load requirements. The processing system generates at least one power equipment proposal based on load requirements generated from the insolation database based on the insolation values associated with a geographic data point closest to the particular location and solar power equipment appropriately selected from the load database based on the load requirements generated from the insolation database.

Claims (61)

1. A design system for generating a power equipment proposal for a particular location, comprising:

an insolation database comprising insolation values associated with a plurality of geographic data points;

a load database associating appropriate power equipment with load requirements; and

a processing system for generating at least one power equipment proposal based on

load requirements generated from the insolation database based on the insolation values associated with a geographic data point closest to the particular location, and

solar power equipment appropriately selected from the load database based on the load requirements generated from the insolation database.

2. A design system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a user interface to allow entry of system specifications, where the processing system further generates the at least one power equipment proposal based on the system specifications.

3. A design system as recited in claim 1 , in which the processing system generates a plurality of power equipment proposals.

4. A design system as recited in claim 3 , further comprising a user interface for allowing one of the plurality of power equipment proposals to be selected.

5. A design system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a user interface, wherein

the user interface allows entry of system specifications;

the processing system generates a plurality of power equipment proposals further based on the system specifications; and

the user interface further allows one of the plurality of power equipment proposals to be selected.

6. A design system as recited in claim 1 , in which:

the insolation database contains at least first and second insolation values; and

the processing system generates a first equipment proposal based on the first value stored in the insolation database; and

the processing system generates a second power equipment proposal based on the second value stored in the insolation database.

7. A design system as recited in claim 6 , in which:

the first value is an average insolation value; and

the second value is a minimum insolation value.

8. A design system as recited in claim 7 , in which a first cost associated with the first power equipment proposal is less than a second cost associated with the second power equipment proposal.

9. A method of generating a power equipment proposal for a particular location, comprising:

providing, in a processing system, an insolation database comprising insolation values associated with a plurality of geographic data points;

providing, in the processing system, a load database associating appropriate solar power equipment with load requirements;

selecting, using the processing system, a geographic data point closest to the particular location;

generating, using the processing system, load requirements from the insolation database based on the insolation values associated with the selected geographic data point;

generating, using the processing system, from the load database a list of power equipment appropriate for the load requirements; and

generating, using the processing system, at least one power equipment proposal based on the load requirements generated from the insolation database and the list of power equipment generated from the load database.

10. A method as recited in claim 9 , further comprising the steps of:

providing a user interface for allowing entry of system specifications; and

generating the at least one power equipment proposal further based on the system specifications.

11. A method as recited in claim 9 , in which a plurality of power equipment proposals are generated.

12. A method as recited in claim 11 , further comprising the steps of:

providing a user interface; and

selecting one of the plurality of power equipment proposals using the user interface.

13. A method as recited in claim 9 , further comprising the steps of:

providing a user interface;

entering system specifications using the user interface;

generating a plurality of power equipment proposals further based on the system specifications; and

selecting one of the plurality of power equipment proposals using the user interlace.

14. A method as recited in claim 9 , in which the insolation database contains at least first and second insolation values, the method further comprising the steps of:

generating a first equipment proposal based on the first value stored in the insolation database; and

generating a second power equipment proposal based on the second value stored in the insolation database.

15. A method as recited in claim 14 , in which:

the first value is an average insolation value; and

the second value is a minimum insolation value.

16. A method as recited in claim 15 , in which a first cost associated with the first power equipment proposal is less than a second cost associated with the second power equipment proposal.

17. A design system for generating a power equipment proposal for a particular location, comprising:

a user interlace that allows entry of system specifications;

an insolation database comprising insolation values associated with a plurality of geographic data points;

a load database associating appropriate power equipment with load requirements; and

a processing system for generating a plurality of power equipment proposals based on

load requirements generated from the insolation database based on the insolation values associated with a geographic data point closest to the particular location,

solar power equipment selected from the load database based on the load requirements generated from the insolation database, and

the system specifications.

18. A design system as recited in claim 17 , in which the user interface further allows one of the plurality of power equipment proposals to be selected.

19. A design system as recited in claim 17 , in which:

the insolation database contains at least average and minimum insolation values; and

the processing system generates a first equipment proposal based on the average insolation value stored in the insolation database; and

the processing system generates a second power equipment proposal based on the minimum value stored in the insolation database.

20. A design system as recited in claim 19 , in which a first cost associated with the first power equipment proposal is less than a second cost associated with the second power equipment proposal.

Assignments (3)
MERGER Recorded Mar 15, 2019
From: OPTIMUS ACQUISITION LLC
To: ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 048616/0510 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2019
From: ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: OPTIMUS ACQUISITION LLC
Reel/Frame 048598/0180 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 12, 2012
From: MEYER, JOHN R.; PETROSKI, GORDON H.
To: ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 029283/0134 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 61547727 · Oct 16, 2011