Method and system for utilizing the energy storage provided by a vehicle's mass in the form of potential and kinetic energy to optimize fuel consumption

1. A method for optimizing fuel consumption of one or more vehicles, executed by a computer, comprising:

receiving a desired speed range and vehicle characteristics;

receiving an elevation profile;

determining location within the elevation profile using a localization mechanism;

calculating one or more speed profiles by an optimization engine to optimize a fuel economy of the vehicle based on the vehicle and terrain characteristics;

using a potential and kinetic energy transfer to adjust motor load and optimize fuel efficiency over the elevation profile;

selecting the speed profile that maintains the vehicle within an assigned range of speed and minimizes fuel consumption;

receiving multiple vehicle characteristics for two or more vehicles traveling in a convoy;

receiving maximum and minimum convoy separation distances for each vehicle in the convoy;

determining or receiving acceleration profiles for all the vehicles in the convoy;

considering the fuel consumption of the complete convoy utilizing the energy storage provided by each vehicle's mass from the convoy in the form of potential energy as a battery to save energy;

converting the potential energy provided by each vehicle's mass from the convoy into kinetic energy to optimize the fuel consumption calculation;

calculating a range of cruise control speeds by the optimization engine to optimize the fuel economy of the convoy of vehicles based on the fuel consumption of the complete convoy and terrain characteristics; and

optimizing a combination of vehicles in the convoy as a whole, providing better fuel savings than individual optimization on each of the two or more vehicles traveling in the convoy separately.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

receiving a route and elevation profile from an elevation database; and

using the potential and kinetic energy transfer to adjust motor load and optimize fuel efficiency over the route based on the elevation data.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the results of the optimization engine are pre-stored in tables in a computer database.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising learning the elevation profiles of previously followed routes.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising estimating a weight of each vehicle for better accuracy of simulation.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising estimating a terrain type.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein an output of the optimization engine is acceleration, torque, or fuel input into an engine.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein gear optimality is taken under consideration in the calculation of both one or more speed profiles and a range of cruise control speeds.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the range of speeds is assigned as a desired speed and a range of allowable deviation when calculating the one or more speed profiles.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting speeds that are closer to a desired speed over speeds that are further away from the desired speed; and

using a compound cost function that includes fuel efficiency and delta speed from desired speed in the calculation when calculating the one or more speed profiles.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein speeds are recommended to an operator.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein speeds are sent as a command to an engine controller.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein an operator will receive predicted fuel expenditures at each speed range selected before driving starts.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

setting maximum and minimum speed limits by one or more transportation rules for the desired speed range, the assigned range of speed, and the range of cruise control speeds, or

setting a minimum speed range by the operator for the desired speed range, the assigned range of speed, and the range of cruise control speeds.

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising setting different speed ranges for different slopes.

16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

setting different speed ranges depending on terrain; and

using the potential and kinetic energy transfer to adjust motor load and optimize fuel efficiency over a route based on the terrain.

17. The method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining elevation profiles from telephone, wifi, or satellite connections.

18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

using elevation profiles provided from earlier vehicles in a convoy or earlier vehicles not related to a present convoy; and

using the potential and kinetic energy transfer to adjust motor load and optimize fuel efficiency over a route based on the elevation profiles.

19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising suggesting speeds and gears in real time to an operator.

20. The method of claim 1 , further comprising warning a driver that a speed selection is a threshold away from an optimal speed for a given location.

21. The method of claim 1 , further comprising optimizing one or more shifting points on a transmission given the speed profile computed.

22. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

specifying an arrival time;

calculating an optimal speed to arrive at a destination before a set arrival time.

23. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

predicting a trajectory of travel to extract elevation given a road that the one or more vehicles traveling in a convoy are driving; and

using the potential and kinetic energy transfer to adjust motor load and optimize fuel efficiency over a route based on a projected trajectory and elevation data.

24. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using wind information in the calculation of both one or more speed profiles and the range of cruise control speeds.

25. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using traffic condition information in the calculation of both one or more speed profiles and the range of cruise control speeds.