IP Library Granted Patent US 8,925,300
Granted Patent B2
US 8,925,300 · App. 13/716,639 · Granted Jan 6, 2015

Zero ceria washcoat catalyst monitor

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,925,300
App. No.
13/716,639
Filed
Dec 17, 2012
Granted
Jan 6, 2015
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3748
USPC
60/277
Abstract

A catalyst degradation detection method for use with a zero ceria catalyst. The method uses techniques to measure transient responses to engine control events of upstream and downstream sensors to determine catalyst degradation and performance. By measuring transient behavior, the method can determine catalyst degradation and performance based on the limited oxygen storage of precious metal catalysts that do not include added ceria or other materials with high oxygen capture rates.

Claims (33)

1. A method of determining catalyst degradation of a catalyst, the method comprising:

detecting, by a processor, an engine control event;

measuring a transient response of a first sensor upstream from the catalyst;

measuring a transient response of a second sensor downstream from the catalyst;

calculating a reaction time of the first sensor to the engine control based on the measured transient response of the first sensor;

calculating a reaction time of the second sensor to the engine control event based on the measured transient response of the second sensor;

comparing the reaction time of the second sensor to the reaction time of the first sensor;

determining if the comparison of the reaction time of the second sensor to the reaction time of the first sensor is less than a predefined threshold value; and

taking corrective action if it is determined that the comparison of the reaction time of the second sensor to the reaction time of the first sensor is less than the predefined threshold value. to the first sensor transient response exceeds a predefined threshold value.

2. The method of determining catalyst degradation of claim 1 , wherein taking corrective action includes illuminating a malfunction indicator lamp.

3. The method of determining catalyst degradation of claim 1 , wherein, the reaction time of the first and second sensors is calculated by comparing a time at which each of the first and second sensors reach a predefined voltage to the time at which the engine control event occurs.

4. The method of determining catalyst degradation of claim 1 , wherein measuring the transient response of the first and second sensors includes calculating an area below a voltage curve for each sensor over a time period.

5. The method of determining catalyst degradation of claim 4 , wherein the time period corresponds to the duration of the engine control event.

6. The method of determining catalyst degradation of claim 1 , wherein measuring the transient response of the first and second sensors includes calculating a time delay between the first sensor response and the second sensor response.

7. The method of determining catalyst degradation of claim 6 , wherein calculating the time delay includes comparing a time value at which the first sensor voltage reaches a predefined value to a time value at which the second sensor voltage reaches the predefined value.

8. The method of determining catalyst degradation of claim 1 , wherein measuring the transient response of the first and second sensors includes calculating a signal length for each sensor over a time period.

9. The method for determining catalyst degradation of claim 8 , wherein the time period corresponds to the duration of the engine control event.

10. A catalyst diagnostic system comprising:

a first sensor located upstream from a catalyst;

a second sensor located downstream from the catalyst; and

detect an engine control event;

measure a transient response of the first sensor;

measure a transient response of the second sensor;

calculate a reaction time of the first sensor to the engine control event based on the measured transient response of the first sensor;

calculate a reaction time of the second sensor to the engine control event based on the measured transient response of the second sensor;

compare the reaction time of the second sensor to the reaction time of the first sensor;

determine if the comparison of the reaction time of the second sensor to the reaction time of the first sensor is less than a predefined threshold value; and

take corrective action if the comparison of the reaction time of the second sensor to the reaction time of the first sensor is less than the predefined threshold value.

11. The catalyst diagnostic system of claim 10 , wherein the engine control unit is further configured to calculate the reaction time of the first and second sensors by comparing a time at which each of the first and second sensors reach a predefined voltage to a time at which the engine control event occurs.

12. The catalyst diagnostic system of claim 10 , wherein the engine control unit is further configured to calculate an area below the voltage curve for each sensor over a time period to measure the transient response of the first and second sensors.

13. The catalyst diagnostic system of claim 10 , wherein the engine control unit is further configured to calculate a time delay between the first sensor response and the second sensor response to measure the transient response of the first and second sensors.

14. The catalyst diagnostic system of claim 10 , wherein the engine control unit is further configured to calculate a signal length for each sensor over a time period to measure the transient response of the first and second sensors.

15. The catalyst diagnostic system of claim 10 , wherein the first and second sensors are O 2 sensors.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: FCA US LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHRYSLER GROUP LLC)
Reel/Frame 048177/0356 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: FCA US LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHRYSLER GROUP LLC)
Reel/Frame 042885/0255 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RELEASING SECOND-LIEN SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 026426 AND FRAME 0644, REEL 026435 AND FRAME 0652, AND REEL 032384 AND FRAME 0591 Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: FCA US LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 037784/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 30, 2015
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: FCA US LLC
Reel/Frame 035553/0356 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 4, 2014
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 032384/0640 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 4, 2014
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 032384/0591 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 4, 2014
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 032384/0477 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2012
From: DALEY, JAMES J; JERGER, ROBERT J; YANG, WEI-JUN; WUTTKE, JEFFREY P; ZAMMIT, MICHAEL G; BROCKER, ANDREW
To: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 029481/0537 →