IP Library Granted Patent US 8,769,095
Granted Patent B2
US 8,769,095 · App. 13/727,097 · Granted Jul 1, 2014

System and method for dynamically grouping devices based on present device conditions

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,769,095
App. No.
13/727,097
Granted
Jul 1, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method to dynamically group devices based on device information, which is associated with a system for monitoring the device information that communicates information between a device and an enterprise. Information is collected from a device information source to obtain an actual status of a device. The actual status of the device is compared to a stored status of the device. The stored status is stored on a server of the enterprise. The enterprise determines if the actual status has been changed from the stored status. When a change is detected, the method performs at least one of the acts of automatically disassociating the device from a group that reflects the stored status and automatically associating the device with a new group to reflect the actual status.

Claims (78)

1. A method that is performed on an enterprise system comprising a server, the method comprising:

obtaining an actual status of a device;

comparing the actual status of the device to a prior status of the device, the device initially being associated with a first group that corresponds to the prior status;

determining that the actual status is different from the prior status based on the comparing;

on the server, consulting a rule to determine to create a second group that corresponds to the actual status of the device;

creating the second group in accordance with the rule, the second group being associated with a group hierarchy comprised of multiple groups at different levels in the group hierarchy;

associating the device with the second group;

sending a first notification to a group in the group hierarchy; and

sending a second notification to another group in the group hierarchy based on failure to receive acknowledgement of the first notification.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising establishing one or more group rules based on a status of the device, the consulted rule being among the one or more group rules.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising sending the first and second notifications when the actual status of the device corresponds to a predefined condition.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising, in response to an additional change in a status of the device, associating the device with one or more other groups and/or disassociating the device from the second group.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that the first group is empty after the device is disassociated from the first group; and

deleting the first group.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

disassociating the device from the first group;

disassociating first group-based business logic from the device when the device is disassociated from the first group; and

associating second group-based business logic with the device when the device is associated with the second group.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the group hierarchy comprises a static root group and one or more sub-groups, the second group being among the one or more sub-groups.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the static root group is defined manually, and the one or more sub-groups are defined dynamically.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the group hierarchy comprises at least one statically-defined group and at least one dynamically-defined group.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second notification is sent based on failure to receive acknowledgement of the first notification within a defined time limit.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the second notification is sent to a next higher-level group in the group hierarchy than the group to which the first notification was sent.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

after sending the second notification, sending successive notifications to progressively higher-level groups in the group hierarchy until acknowledgement of one of the successive notifications is received.

13. Non-transitory machine-readable storage storing instructions that are executable to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an actual status of a device;

comparing the actual status of the device to a prior status of the device, the device initially being associated with a first group that corresponds to the prior status;

determining that the actual status is different from the prior status based on the comparing;

consulting a rule to determine to create a second group that corresponds to the actual status of the device;

creating the second group in accordance with the rule, the second group being associated with a group hierarchy comprised of multiple groups at different levels in the group hierarchy;

associating the device with the second group;

sending a first notification to a group in the group hierarchy; and

sending a second notification to another group in the group hierarchy based on failure to receive acknowledgement of the first notification.

14. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the operations comprise establishing one or more group rules based on a status of the device, the consulted rule being among the one or more group rules.

15. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the operations comprise sending the first and second notifications when the actual status of the device corresponds to a predefined condition.

16. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 15 , wherein the operations comprise, in response to an additional change in a status of the device, associating the device with one or more other groups and/or disassociating the device from the second group.

17. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the operations comprise:

determining that the first group is empty after the device is disassociated from the first group; and

deleting the first group.

18. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the operations comprise:

disassociating the device from the first group;

disassociating first group-based business logic from the device when the device is disassociated from the first group; and

associating second group-based business logic with the device when the device is associated with the second group.

19. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the group hierarchy comprises a static root group and one or more sub-groups, the second group being among the one or more sub-groups.

20. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 19 , wherein the static root group is defined manually, and the one or more sub-groups are defined dynamically.

21. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the group hierarchy comprises at least one statically-defined group and at least one dynamically-defined group.

22. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the second notification is sent based on failure to receive acknowledgement of the first notification within a defined time limit.

23. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 22 , wherein the second notification is sent to a next higher-level group in the group hierarchy than the group to which the first notification was sent.

24. The non-transitory machine-readable storage of claim 13 , wherein the operations comprise:

after sending the second notification, sending successive notifications to progressively higher-level groups in the group hierarchy until acknowledgement of one of the successive notifications is received.

25. A system comprising:

a processing apparatus programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an actual status of a device;

comparing the actual status of the device to a prior status of the device, the device initially being associated with a first group that corresponds to the prior status;

determining that the actual status is different from the prior status based on the comparing;

consulting a rule to determine to create a second group that corresponds to the actual status of the device;

creating the second group in accordance with the rule, the second group being associated with a group hierarchy comprised of multiple groups at different levels in the group hierarchy;

associating the device with the second group; sending a first notification to a group in the group hierarchy; and

sending a second notification to another group in the group hierarchy based on failure to receive acknowledgement of the first notification.

26. The system of claim 25 , wherein the operations comprise establishing one or more group rules based on a status of the device, the consulted rule being among the one or more group rules.

27. The system of claim 25 , wherein the operations comprise sending the first and second notifications when the actual status of the device corresponds to a predefined condition.

28. The system of claim 27 , wherein the operations comprise, in response to an additional change in a status of the device, associating the device with one or more other groups and/or disassociating the device from the second group.

29. The system of claim 25 , wherein the operations comprise:

determining that the first group is empty after the device is disassociated from the first group; and

deleting the first group.

30. The system of claim 25 , wherein the operations comprise:

disassociating the device from the first group;

disassociating first group-based business logic from the device when the device is disassociated from the first group; and

associating second group-based business logic with the device when the device is associated with the second group.

31. The system of claim 25 , wherein the group hierarchy comprises a static root group and one or more sub-groups, the second group being among the one or more sub-groups.

32. The system of claim 31 , wherein the static root group is defined manually, and the one or more sub-groups are defined dynamically.

33. The system of claim 25 , wherein the group hierarchy comprises at least one statically-defined group and at least one dynamically-defined group.

34. The system of claim 25 , wherein the second notification is sent based on failure to receive acknowledgement of the first notification within a defined time limit.

35. The system of claim 34 , wherein the second notification is sent to a next higher-level group in the group hierarchy than the group to which the first notification was sent.

36. The system of claim 25 , wherein the operations comprise:

after sending the second notification, sending successive notifications to progressively higher-level groups in the group hierarchy until acknowledgement of one of the successive notifications is received.

Assignments (7)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2018
From: PTC INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 047480/0888 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2015
From: PTC INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 037046/0930 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 035697 FRAME: 0321. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER. Recorded Jun 1, 2015
From: AXEDA CORPORATION
To: PTC INC.
Reel/Frame 035806/0158 →
MERGER Recorded May 22, 2015
From: PTC INC.
To: PTC INC.
Reel/Frame 035697/0321 →
MERGER Recorded May 22, 2015
From: AXEDA ACQUISITION CORP.
To: AXEDA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 035697/0044 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2014
From: HART, DAVID P.; TAYLOR, JOHN L.
To: QUESTRA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032015/0036 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2013
From: QUESTRA CORPORATION
To: AXEDA ACQUISITION CORP.
Reel/Frame 030057/0444 →