IP Library Granted Patent US 8,949,655
Granted Patent B2
US 8,949,655 · App. 13/755,794 · Granted Feb 3, 2015

Preventing extreme coresidency hazards in cloud computing

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,949,655
App. No.
13/755,794
Granted
Feb 3, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various exemplary embodiments relate to a method of preventing extreme coresidency hazards among application instances in a cloud network. The method includes determining a first failure group of a first instance of an application; establishing a connection with a second instance of a peer application; determining a second failure group of the second instance; comparing the first failure group to the second failure group; and establishing a second connection with a third instance of the peer application if the first failure group and the second failure group share a failure point.

Claims (71)

1. A method comprising:

determining, by a processor communicatively connected to a memory, a first failure group of a first instance of an application;

establishing a connection between the first instance and a second instance associated with a peer application;

determining a second failure group of the second instance;

comparing the first failure group to the second failure group; and

establishing a second connection between the first instance and a third instance corresponding to the peer application if the first failure group and the second failure group share a failure point.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving failure group information of the third instance;

determining a third failure group for the third instance; and

comparing the third failure group to the first failure group.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

periodically requesting failure group information of at least one of the first instance, the second instance, and the third instance;

receiving new failure group information of an updated instance;

determining a new failure group for the updated instance; and

comparing the new failure group to the first failure group.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a request for a failure group information from an application;

determining a host failure group information; and

providing the host failure group information to the requesting application.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining a failure group of an instance comprises:

sending a request to the instance of the peer application;

receiving a failure group information from the instance.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the request is sent outside of a communications channel used for communication with the peer application.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the request is sent to a different port than a port of the communications channel.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining a failure group of an instance comprises measuring a heuristic of the instance.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein measuring a heuristic comprises tracing a network path to the instance.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the first failure group to the second failure group comprises generating a heuristic score for the first failure group and the second failure group.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein generating a heuristic score is based on a length of a path to the instance.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first failure group is a physical address of a computing resource executing a host application instance performing the method.

13. A tangible non-transitory machine-readable storage medium encoded with instructions that when executed by a processor, performs a method of preventing extreme single point of failure hazards of application instances within a cloud network, the tangible non-transitory machine-readable storage medium comprising:

instructions for determining a first failure group of a first instance of an application;

instructions for establishing a connection with a second instance corresponding to a peer application;

instructions for determining a second failure group of the second instance;

instructions for comparing the first failure group to the second failure group; and

instructions for establishing a second connection with a third instance corresponding to the peer application if the first failure group and the second failure group share a failure point.

14. The tangible non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 13 , further comprising:

instructions for receiving a request for failure group information from an application;

instructions for determining a physical address of the processor; and

instructions for providing the physical address to the requesting application as failure group information.

15. The tangible non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the step of determining a failure group of an instance comprises:

instructions for sending a request to the instance of the peer application;

instructions for receiving a failure group information from the instance.

16. The tangible non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions for determining a failure group of an instance comprise instructions for measuring a heuristic of the instance.

17. The tangible non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions for determining the first failure group of the first instance comprise instructions for determining the first failure group based on a physical address of the processor.

18. A cloud network comprising:

a data center having a plurality of computing resources including a plurality of processors;

a cloud manager configured to:

manage a plurality of application instances by assigning computing resources including at least one processor to each application instance;

provide a universally unique identifier to an application instance identifying the at least one processor assigned to the application instance;

provide a listing of network addresses of a plurality of peer application instances providing a service,

wherein at least one of the application instances is configured to:

determine a first universally unique identifier of a processor assigned to the application instance and a second universally unique identifier of a processor assigned to a peer application instance;

determine whether the first universally unique identifier and the second universally unique identifier are members of a failure group; and

select another network address from the listing if the first universally unique identifier and the second universally unique identifier are members of a failure group.

19. An apparatus for reducing risks from a single point of failure in a cloud network, the apparatus comprising:

a data storage; and

a processor communicatively connected to the data storage, the processor being configured to:

determine a first failure group of a first instance of an application;

establish a connection with a second instance corresponding to a peer application;

determine a second failure group of the second instance;

compare the first failure group to the second failure group; and

establish a second connection with a third instance corresponding to the peer application if the first failure group and the second failure group share a failure point.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , further comprising:

instructions for receiving a request for failure group information from an application;

instructions for determining a physical address of the processor; and

instructions for providing the physical address to the requesting application as failure group information.

21. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the step of determining a failure group of an instance comprises:

instructions for sending a request to the instance of the peer application;

instructions for receiving a failure group information from the instance.

22. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the instructions for determining a failure group of an instance comprise instructions for measuring a heuristic of the instance.

23. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the processor is configured to determine the first failure group based on a physical address of the processor.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OT WSOU TERRIER HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056990/0081 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2020
From: ALCATEL LUCENT
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 052372/0675 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2014
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 032352/0262 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 31, 2013
From: BAUER, ERIC J.; ADAMS, RANDEE S.; EUSTACE, DANIEL W.; NAMJOSHI, KEDAR S.; KIPP, LYLE D.
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 029733/0646 →