IP Library Granted Patent US 8,854,929
Granted Patent B1
US 8,854,929 · App. 13/787,760 · Granted Oct 7, 2014

Disk drive calibrating laser power and write current for heat assisted magnetic recording

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,854,929
App. No.
13/787,760
Granted
Oct 7, 2014
Kind
B1
Abstract

A disk drive is disclosed comprising a head actuated over a disk, wherein the head comprises a laser operable to heat the disk while writing data to the disk. An initial laser power of the laser is configured. After a time interval, an operating laser power of the laser is measured, and when the operating laser power falls below the initial laser power, a control signal applied to the laser is first adjusted until the operating laser power substantially matches the initial laser power. After first adjusting the control signal applied to the laser, a quality metric representing a recording quality of the head is measured, and when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality, the control signal applied to the laser is second adjusted so that the operating laser power exceeds the initial laser power.

Claims (45)

1. A disk drive comprising:

a disk;

a head actuated over the disk, wherein the head comprises a laser operable to heat the disk while writing data to the disk; and

control circuitry operable to:

configure an initial laser power of the laser; and

after a time interval:

measure an operating laser power of the laser;

when the operating laser power falls below the initial laser power, first adjust a control signal applied to the laser until the operating laser power substantially matches the initial laser power;

after first adjusting the control signal applied to the laser, measure a quality metric representing a recording quality of the head; and

when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality, second adjust the control signal applied to the laser so that the operating laser power exceeds the initial laser power.

2. The disk drive as recited in claim 1 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the control circuitry is further operable to increase a write current applied to the head.

3. The disk drive as recited in claim 1 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the control circuitry is further operable to adjust the control signal applied to the laser and adjust a write current relative to a power consumption of the disk drive.

4. The disk drive as recited in claim 1 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the control circuitry is further operable to measure a quality metric curve relative to an amplitude of a write current.

5. The disk drive as recited in claim 4 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the control circuitry is further operable to measure a plurality of the quality metric curves over a plurality of different operating laser powers for the laser.

6. The disk drive as recited in claim 5 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the control circuitry is further operable to select the control signal applied to the laser and select the write current based on an optimal point in a space representing the quality metric curves.

7. The disk drive as recited in claim 6 , wherein the optimal point substantially minimizes a power consumption of the disk drive.

8. The disk drive as recited in claim 6 , wherein the optimal point maximizes the quality metric relative to a maximum power consumption of the disk drive.

9. The disk drive as recited in claim 6 , wherein the optimal point adds a margin to the quality metric without exceeding a power consumption threshold of the disk drive.

10. The disk drive as recited in claim 6 , wherein the control circuitry is further operable to predict a failure condition when the optimal point corresponds to a power consumption of the disk drive exceeding a power consumption threshold.

11. The disk drive as recited in claim 5 , wherein the control circuitry is further operable to save the plurality of the quality metric curves in a history log.

12. The disk drive as recited in claim 1 , wherein the head further comprises a photodiode, and the control circuitry is further operable to:

evaluate the photodiode to detect a mode change of the laser; and

when the mode change is detected, adjust the operating laser power.

13. The disk drive as recited in claim 12 , wherein when the mode change is detected the control circuitry is further operable to decrease the operating laser power and increase a write current applied to the head.

14. A method of operating a disk drive comprising a head actuated over a disk, wherein the head comprises a laser operable to heat the disk while writing data to the disk, the method comprising:

configuring an initial laser power of the laser; and

after a time interval:

measuring an operating laser power of the laser;

when the operating laser power falls below the initial laser power, first adjusting a control signal applied to the laser until the operating laser power substantially matches the initial laser power;

after first adjusting the control signal applied to the laser, measuring a quality metric representing a recording quality of the head; and

when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality, second adjusting the control signal applied to the laser so that the operating laser power exceeds the initial laser power.

15. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the method further comprises increasing a write current applied to the head.

16. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the method further comprises adjusting the control signal applied to the laser and adjust a write current relative to a power consumption of the disk drive.

17. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the method further comprises measuring a quality metric curve relative to an amplitude of a write current.

18. The method as recited in claim 17 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the method further comprises measuring a plurality of the quality metric curves over a plurality of different operating laser powers for the laser.

19. The method as recited in claim 18 , wherein when the quality metric indicates a poor recording quality the method further comprises selecting the control signal applied to the laser and select the write current based on an optimal point in a space representing the quality metric curves.

20. The method as recited in claim 19 , wherein the optimal point substantially minimizes a power consumption of the disk drive.

21. The method as recited in claim 19 , wherein the optimal point maximizes the quality metric relative to a maximum power consumption of the disk drive.

22. The disk drive as recited in claim 19 , wherein the optimal point adds a margin to the quality metric without exceeding a power consumption threshold of the disk drive.

23. The method as recited in claim 19 , wherein the method further comprises predicting a failure condition when the optimal point corresponds to a power consumption of the disk drive exceeding a power consumption threshold.

24. The method as recited in claim 18 , wherein the method further comprises saving the plurality of the quality metric curves in a history log.

25. The method as recited in claim 13 , wherein the head further comprises a photodiode, and the method further comprises:

evaluating the photodiode to detect a mode change of the laser; and

when the mode change is detected, adjust the operating laser power.

26. The method as recited in claim 25 , wherein when the mode change of the laser is detected, further comprising decreasing the operating laser power and increasing a write current applied to the head.

Assignments (8)
PATENT COLLATERAL AGREEMENT - DDTL LOAN AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 21, 2023
From: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 067045/0156 →
PATENT COLLATERAL AGREEMENT - A&R LOAN AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 21, 2023
From: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 064715/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 038744 FRAME 0481 Recorded Feb 8, 2022
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 058982/0556 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2018
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 045501/0714 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 17, 2016
From: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038744/0481 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 17, 2016
From: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038744/0281 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 17, 2016
From: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038722/0229 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 6, 2013
From: CHAMPION, ERIC J.; WOLF, CHRISTOPHER B.; STOEV, KROUM .
To: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 029936/0627 →