IP Library Granted Patent US 9,116,861
Granted Patent B2
US 9,116,861 · App. 13/789,988 · Granted Aug 25, 2015

Cascading failover of blade servers in a data center

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,116,861
App. No.
13/789,988
Granted
Aug 25, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Cascading failover of blade servers in a data center implemented by transferring by a system management server a data processing workload from a failing blade server to an initial replacement blade server, with the data processing workload characterized by data processing resource requirements and the initial replacement blade server having data processing resources that do not match the data processing resource requirements; and transferring by the system management server the data processing workload from the initial replacement blade server to a subsequent replacement blade server, where the subsequent replacement blade server has data processing resources that better match the data processing resource requirements than do the data processing resources of the initial replacement blade server.

Claims (11)

1. A method of cascading failover of blade servers in a data center, the method comprising:

transferring by a system management server a data processing workload from a failing blade server to an initial replacement blade server, the data processing workload characterized by data processing resource requirements, the initial replacement blade server having data processing resources that do not match the data processing resource requirements; and

transferring by the system management server the data processing workload from the initial replacement blade server to a subsequent replacement blade server, the subsequent replacement blade server having data processing resources that better match the data processing resource requirements than do the data processing resources of the initial replacement blade server.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising maintaining by the system management server records indicating which blade servers in the data center are candidates for workload transfer to a subsequent replacement blade server, a candidate being a blade server whose data processing resources do not match the data processing resource requirements of a data processing workload executing on that blade server.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising monitoring by the system management server a pool of standby blade servers for availability of replacement blade servers that better match the data processing resource requirements of a data processing workload executing on a candidate than do the data processing resources of the candidate.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising selecting the subsequent replacement blade server from a pool of standby blade servers, the subsequent replacement blade server providing, as among the standby blade servers, the best available match between the data processing resource requirements and the data processing resources of the subsequent replacement blade server.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein:

the data processing workload is executed on a virtual machine on the failing blade server; and

the data processing resource requirements are implemented as virtual machine metadata describing the data processing resource requirements of the virtual machine.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising deriving by the system management server the data processing resource requirements based upon actual data processing resource utilization of the data processing workload.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising deriving by the system management server the data processing resource requirements based upon actual data processing resources provided by blade servers upon which one or more data processing workloads execute.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 6, 2019
From: LENOVO ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD.
To: LENOVO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 050300/0878 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENT CONTAINING TYPO ERRORS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 037101 FRAME: 0969. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 28, 2015
From: LENOVO ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: LENOVO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 037689/0190 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 12, 2015
From: LENOVO ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: LENOVO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 037101/0969 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2014
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: LENOVO ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 034194/0111 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 8, 2013
From: BENNAH, ALBERT D.; RODRIGUEZ, ADRIAN X.; ZUO, YING
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029949/0726 →