IP Library Granted Patent US 9,141,662
Granted Patent B2
US 9,141,662 · App. 13/793,911 · Granted Sep 22, 2015

Intelligent evidence classification and notification in a deep question answering system

Inventors: Adam T. Clark (Mantorville, MN); Mark G. Megerian (Rochester, MN); John E. Petri (St. Charles, MN); Richard J. Stevens (Rochester, MN)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
G06F17/30386G06F17/3053G06F17/30654
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,141,662
App. No.
13/793,911
Granted
Sep 22, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

System, method, and computer program product to identify changes in evidence used to answer questions by a deep question answering system, by identifying a first evidence related to a feature, the deep question answering system having identified the feature as being relevant to answering a first type of question of a plurality of types of questions, and responsive to: (i) detecting a change in the first evidence, and (ii) determining that a confidence score of a first response generated for a first question, of the first type of question, exceeds a confidence threshold, generating an updated response for the first question based on the changed first evidence.

Claims (19)

1. A method to identify changes in evidence used to answer questions by a question answering system, comprising:

identifying a first evidence related to a feature, wherein the question answering system has identified the feature as being relevant to answering a first type of question of a plurality of types of questions;

detecting a change in the first evidence

determining that a confidence score of a first response generated for a first question, of the first type of question, exceeds a confidence threshold;

outputting an indication of the change in the first evidence; and

responsive to receiving an approval to update the first response, generating an updated response for the first question.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a user provides the approval.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the updated response is based on at least one of: (i) processing of a second question, of the first type, and (ii) reprocessing the first question.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the second question is generated by one of: (i) the question answering system, and (ii) a user.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first evidence is unavailable, wherein the change in the first evidence comprises an availability of the first evidence.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first evidence is available, wherein the change in the first evidence comprises a change in a content of the first evidence.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising monitoring the first evidence to detect the change.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the first evidence is monitored upon determining that a relevance score of the first evidence exceeds a relevance threshold, wherein the first evidence comprises a content of at least one of: (i) a document, (ii) a variable, (iii) an article, and (iv) a web page, and wherein the first question is part of a first case comprising at least the first question.

9. A method to identify changes in evidence used to answer questions by a question answering system, the method comprising:

identifying a first evidence related to a feature, wherein the question answering system has identified the feature as being relevant to answering a first type of question of a plurality of types of questions;

generating an updated response for the first question based on the changed first evidence responsive to: (i) detecting a change in the first evidence, and (ii) determining that a confidence score of a first response generated for a first question, of the first type of question, exceeds a confidence threshold; and

notifying a user of the change in the first evidence, wherein the updated response is generated upon approval of the user.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising monitoring the first evidence to detect the change.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first evidence is monitored upon determining that a relevance score of the first evidence exceeds a relevance threshold, wherein the first evidence comprises a content of at least one of: (i) a document, (ii) a variable, (iii) an article, and (iv) a web page, and wherein the first question is part of a first case comprising at least the first question.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2017
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: SINOEAST CONCEPT LIMITED
Reel/Frame 041388/0557 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2013
From: CLARK, ADAM T.; MEGERIAN, MARK G.; PETRI, JOHN E.; STEVENS, RICHARD J.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 031789/0805 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13717146 · Dec 17, 2012
Related Publication 20140172880A1 · Jun 19, 2014