IP Library Granted Patent US 9,116,894
Granted Patent B2
US 9,116,894 · App. 13/828,048 · Granted Aug 25, 2015

Method and system for tagging objects comprising tag recommendation based on query-based ranking and annotation relationships between objects and tags

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,116,894
App. No.
13/828,048
Granted
Aug 25, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system is disclosed for tagging a latent object with selected tag recommendations, including a set of content objects wherein each object is characterized by an associated set of content features. An annotation relationship is determined between the features and a pre-determined tag for the each object, the relationship being defined by a graph construction representative of an affinity relationship between each pre-selected tag and content object to a selected query. A plurality of the annotation relationships are ranked based upon a relevance of the preselected tags to the content features in response to a new query for assigning a new tag to the each object, so that a suggested tag is made from the ranking whereby the suggested tag is determined as a most likely tag for annotating the content object.

Claims (28)

1. A method for tagging a latent object with selected tag recommendations, including:

receiving an input from a user for tagging the latent object wherein the input includes a user tag preference and wherein the latent object is characterized by a set of predetermined tags representative of an associated set of content features;

generating a query using the tag preference for comparing the tag preference to the set of predetermined tags;

determining a first annotation relationship between the features and the set of predetermined tags for the object, the relationship being defined by a graph construction representative of an affinity relationship between each predetermined tag and the object content features;

determining a second annotation relationship representative of frequency of tagging usage of each of the set of predetermined tags;

ranking the first and second annotation relationships based upon a weighted relevance of the predetermined tags and the user tag preference to the object content features using a neighborhood linearization technique to infer edge weights; and

suggesting a plurality of suggested tags from the ranking whereby the suggested tags are determined as most likely for annotating the content object.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the determining the first annotation relationship comprises constructing a sparse affinity graph representative of the affinity relationship.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the ranking comprises computing ranking vectors for the content objects and predetermined tags, respectively, in accordance with an iterative evaluation for identifying a converging correlation between the content objects and the predetermined tags in response to the query.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the determining the first annotation relationship comprises an integrating of the annotation relationship between the latent object, the predetermined tags, and the user tag preference.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the defining of the graph construction comprises a use of object features and an l 1 -norm minimization.

6. The method of claim 5 further including determining an affinity relationship between the predetermined tags using a sparse graph construction based on l 1 -norm minimization for building a tag affinity graph.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the ranking includes deploying a Laplacian regularization framework on the graph construction for assessing a label propagation framework.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the graph construction comprises object and tag affinity graphs.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the determining and ranking comprise latent objects including images or documents.

10. A tag recommendation system for annotating content objects including:

an annotation module comprising an annotation relationship detector and ranking processor wherein each object is characterized by an associated set of content features and the processor determines a first annotation relationship between the features and predetermined tags for the object, the relationship being defined by a graph construction representative of an affinity relationship between the predetermined tags and content objects to a selected query; and,

determining a second annotation relationship representative of frequency of tagging usaqe of each of the set of predetermined tags, wherein the processor ranks a plurality of the annotation relationships based upon a relevance of the predetermined tags to the content features in response to a user input of a user tag preference for assigning a new tag to the object, and suggesting suggested tags from the ranking as most likely for annotating the content object.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein the first annotation relationship comprises a construction of a sparse affinity graph representative of the affinity relationship.

12. The system of claim 11 wherein the graph construction comprises a use of object features and an l 1 -norm minimization.

13. The system of claim 10 wherein the first annotation relationship comprises computing ranking vectors for the content objects and predetermined tags, respectively, in accordance with an iterative evaluation for identifying a converging correlation between the content objects and the predetermined tags in response to the selected query.

14. The system of claim 10 wherein the annotation relationship comprises an integration of the annotation relationship between the latent object and the predetermined tags.

15. The system of claim 10 wherein the first annotation relationship comprises a Laplacian regularization framework on the graph construction for assessing a label propagation framework.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the graph construction comprises object and tag affinity graphs.

17. The system of claim 10 wherein the content objects are internet accessible.

18. The system of claim 10 wherein the content objects comprise a computer memory stored collection of content objects.

19. The method of claim 1 further including comparing the ranking of the first annotation relationship and the ranking of the second annotation relationship to the user tag preference.

20. The method of claim 10 further including comparing the ranking of the first annotation relationship and the ranking of the second annotation relationship to the user tag preference.

Assignments (6)
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT RF 064760/0389 Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068261/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064760/0389 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT R/F 062740/0214 Recorded May 18, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS AGENT
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063694/0122 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2022
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 062740/0214 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2018
From: PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO SQUARE 1 BANK
To: INTELLISIST, INC.
Reel/Frame 045567/0639 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2013
From: CHIDLOVSKII, BORIS
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030001/0614 →