IP Library Granted Patent US 9,097,097
Granted Patent B2
US 9,097,097 · App. 13/847,962 · Granted Aug 4, 2015

Method of determination of fracture extent

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,097,097
App. No.
13/847,962
Granted
Aug 4, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A pressure pulse is initiated from the wellbore into the fractured formation where the frac fluid brings into the fractures a material that is responsive to the pressure pulse alone. Alternatively, or with a combination with a wellbore pressure pulse, well conditions such as time exposure and temperature can initiate local pressure pulses within the fracture with the result being signal generation of an electromagnetic signal that is measured with multiple sensors to allow triangulation of the location of the fracture extremities. The material can be a piezoelectric material that responds to the pressure pulse or ferromagnetic materials that similarly respond to the pulse to create the measured signals. The material can be delivered initially with the frac fluid or at different points in time during the fracture operation. Different materials with unique signal generating characteristics can be used to get a clearer picture of the extent of the fracture.

Claims (49)

1. A fracture mapping method, comprising:

non-electrically generating at least one electromagnetic signal in subterranean fractures;

sensing said signal;

determining the extent of said fractures with said signal.

2. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

sensing said signal in spaced locations.

3. The method of claim 2 , comprising:

locating sensors in a borehole and on a surface location above said borehole for said sensing.

4. The method of claim 3 , comprising:

triangulating said sensors to determine the extent of the fractures.

5. A fracture mapping method, comprising:

generating at least one electromagnetic signal in subterranean fractures;

sensing said signal;

determining the extent of said fractures with said signal;

using a pressure pulse to trigger said electromagnetic signal.

6. The method of claim 5 , comprising:

creating said pressure pulse with explosives.

7. The method of claim 6 , comprising:

creating said pressure pulse reactively with well fluids in the borehole.

8. The method of claim 5 , comprising:

extending said fractures with said pressure pulse.

9. A fracture mapping method, comprising:

generating at least one electromagnetic signal in subterranean fractures;

sensing said signal;

determining the extent of said fractures with said signal;

using a piezoelectric material to trigger said signal.

10. The method of claim 9 , comprising:

adding said piezoelectric material to proppant used to create said fractures at the outset of forming said fractures.

11. The method of claim 10 , comprising:

adding piezoelectric material throughout the formation of said fractures.

12. The method of claim 9 , comprising:

using a ferromagnetic material to trigger said signal.

13. The method of claim 9 , comprising:

using lead zirconate titanate, lead zirconate niobate, lead manganese niobate, or/and lead lanthanum zirconate titanate as said piezoelectric materials.

14. A fracture mapping method, comprising:

generating at least one electromagnetic signal in subterranean fractures;

sensing said signal;

determining the extent of said fractures with said signal;

using a ferromagnetic or/and a ferrimagnetic material to trigger said signal.

15. The method of claim 14 , comprising:

adding said ferromagnetic material to proppant used to create said fractures at the outset of forming said fractures.

16. The method of claim 15 , comprising:

adding ferromagnetic material throughout the formation of said fractures.

17. The method of claim 14 , comprising:

using as said magnetic materials elemental iron, nickel, cobalt, dysprosium, gadolinium, and alloys of said materials, chromium (IV) oxide, gallium manganese arsenide, magnetite, samarium-cobalt, neodymium-cobalt, yttrium iron garnets, spinels of the form AB2O4, where A and B represent various metal cations, comprising iron Fe, MnBi, EuO, CrBr3, EuS, MOFe2O3, and/or other oxides of iron, cobalt, and nickel.

18. The method of claim 14 , comprising:

using granular media with monomodal or multimodal distributions or layered constructions of one or more materials, elongated particles, hollow spheres or rods, platelets, fibers, and agglomerates thereof for the shape of said magnetic particles.

19. The method of claim 14 , comprising:

using magnetic particle size ranges wherein the largest physical average dimension measured linearly is between 1 and 100 nanometers or from 100 nm to 500 nm, 500 nm to 1 micron, 1 micron to 10 microns, and/or particles or clusters in excess of 10 microns to 1000 microns, or particles and clusters between 1 mm and 10 mm.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 3, 2023
From: BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC
To: BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 062266/0006 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 30, 2022
From: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
To: BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 062019/0504 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2013
From: DIFOGGIO, ROCCO; DIGIOVANNI, ANTHONY A.; HETZ, AVI
To: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 030057/0692 →