System, method, and computer algorithm and characterization and classification of electrophysiological evoked potentials
View Patent ↗An automated EP analysis apparatus for monitoring, detecting and identifying changes (adverse or recovering) to a physiological system generating the analyzed EPs, wherein the apparatus is adapted to characterize and classify EPs and create alerts of changes (adverse or recovering) to the physiological systems generating the EPs if the acquired EP waveforms change significantly in latency, amplitude or morphology.
1. When somatosensory EP waveforms are acquired, a method of automatically identifying potential injury to peripheral nerve structures comprising:
causing, by an automated EP analysis apparatus with an electrical pulse via electrodes, stimulation of a peripheral nerve structure, the automated EP analysis apparatus having a processor and memory;
recording, by the automated EP analysis apparatus via electrodes placed at the neck or head, signals forming a resultant electrical (EP) waveform generated by the nervous system;
measuring, by the automated EP analysis apparatus, a change in the recorded EP waveform relative to a baseline response, the change comprising Euclidean distance between the recorded EP waveform and the baseline response;
comparing, by the automated EP analysis apparatus, the change with one or more threshold change values to classify the recorded EP waveform; and
determining, by the automated EP analysis apparatus, whether a current state of the peripheral nerve structure has changed based on the classification of the recorded EP waveform by determining whether a count of EP waveforms in a classification exceeds a threshold count value.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
alerting the user to the changes; and
allowing the user the option to decide if the data is accurate.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
passing that information to an automated operating room table; and
automatically or semi automatically readjusting patient position through adjustment of the table to ameliorate or avoid injury.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising estimating the baseline response.
5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising updating the baseline response based on the recorded EP waveform.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the change comprises the Euclidian distance and at least one from a group consisting of: a pseudo-correlation, a cross-correlation, and an energy ratio between the recorded EP waveform and the baseline response.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the recorded EP waveform is classified into four possible categories: good, bad, undetermined, and unreliable based on the change relative to the baseline response.
8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the threshold change value for a good classification relates to how similar the recorded EP waveform should be to the baseline response.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein a threshold change value relates to how similar the recorded EP waveform should be to the baseline response.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the count of EP waveforms in the classification exceeds the threshold count value comprises:
counting the number of EP responses that are classified in a given classification;
comparing the current count to the threshold count value; and
if the current count exceeds the threshold count value, changing the state of the peripheral nerve structure to the state that corresponds with the exceeded threshold count value.
11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating an alert if the current state of the peripheral nerve structure has changed.