Granted Patent B1

US 8,628,970 · App. 13/909,780 · Granted Jan 14, 2014

Inventors: John F. Schabron (Laramie, WY); Joseph F. Rovani, Jr. (Laramie, WY)

Assignee: The University of Wyoming Research Corporation

Abstract

Claims (31)

1. A method of estimating processability for hydroprocessing of a hydrocarbon-containing feedstock of unknown processability for hydroprocessing, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) preparing a liquid sample of a hydrocarbon-containing feedstock having asphaltenes that include different asphaltene fractions of different polarity;

(b) precipitating at least some of said asphaltenes from said liquid sample with one or more precipitants in a chromatographic column;

(c) dissolving at least two of said different asphaltene fractions from said precipitated asphaltenes during a successive dissolution protocol that uses dissolving solvents of increasing strength;

(d) eluting said at least two different dissolved asphaltene fractions from said chromatographic column;

(e) detecting said at least two eluted fractions with a liquid chromatography detector to generate a detector signal for each said eluted fraction;

wherein said step of detecting comprises monitoring the amount of said eluted fractions from said chromatographic column with said liquid chromatography detector, and wherein said signal is proportional to the amount of each said eluted fraction,

(f) using said signals to calculate a percentage of each peak area for a first amount and a second amount of dissolved asphaltenes relative to the total peak areas, wherein the peak areas are derived from the signals, to determine a parameter that relates to processability for hydroprocessing of said hydrocarbon-containing feedstock;

(g) determining processability for hydroprocessing of said hydrocarbon-containing feedstock;

(h) repeating said steps (a)-(g) for at least one additional hydrocarbon-containing feedstock, thereby determining said parameter and said processability for each of said at least one additional hydrocarbon-containing feedstock;

(i) determining a mathematical relationship between said determined parameters and respective said determined processabilities for said hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks;

(j) performing steps (a)-(f) on said hydrocarbon-containing feedstock of unknown processability for hydroprocessing and determining a parameter that relates to hydroprocessing of said hydrocarbon-containing feedstock of unknown processability for hydroprocessing; and

(k) estimating said processability for hydroprocessing of said hydrocarbon-containing feedstock of unknown processability for hydroprocessing through use of said mathematical relationship and said parameter that relates to hydroprocessing of said hydrocarbon-containing feedstock of unknown processability for hydroprocessing.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks comprises a material selected from the group consisting of oil, crude oil, asphalt, and a coal-derived product.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said one or more precipitants in step (b) is selected from the group consisting of iso-octane, pentane, heptane, hexane, and mixtures thereof.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (c) comprises:

(i) dissolving a first amount of the precipitated asphaltenes in one or more first dissolving solvents having a solubility parameter at least 1 MPa 0.5 higher than the one or more precipitants;

(ii) dissolving a second amount of the precipitated asphaltenes in one or more second dissolving solvents having a solubility parameter higher than the one or more first dissolving solvents, wherein the solubility parameter of the one or more second dissolving solvents is at least about 21 MPa 0.5 but no greater than about 30 MPa 0.5 .

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising prior to step (ii): dissolving at least part of the precipitated asphaltenes in one or more third dissolving solvents having a solubility parameter between the solubility parameter of the first dissolving solvent and the solubility parameter of the second dissolving solvent; and dissolving at least part of the precipitated asphaltenes in one or more fourth dissolving solvents having a solubility parameter between the solubility parameter of the third dissolving solvent and the solubility parameter of the second dissolving solvent.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (c) comprises:

(i) gradually and continuously changing the one or more precipitants to a first final mobile phase dissolving solvent having a solubility parameter at least about 1 MPa 0.5 higher than the one or more precipitants to dissolve a first amount of the precipitated asphaltenes; and

(ii) gradually and continuously changing the first final mobile phase dissolving solvent to a second final mobile phase dissolving solvent having a solubility parameter at least about 1 MPa 0.5 higher than the first final mobile phase dissolving solvent to dissolve a second amount of the precipitated asphaltenes.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the processability for hydroprocessing comprises processability for hydrotreating.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameter is further derived from the total asphaltene content in the hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the chromatographic column contains a substantially inert stationary phase.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of determining a mathematical relationship comprises the step of determining a mathematical relationship selected from the group consisting of: graphical relationship and formulaic relationship.

11. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: comparing determined parameters for different feedstocks to predict which of the feedstocks is a leading candidate for processability for hydroprocessing; and selecting a leading candidate feedstock based on processability of the feedstock for hydroprocessing and price.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising the steps of generating a cost value for the leading candidate feedstock, and comparing the cost value generated for the leading candidate feedstock with a market price of the same or different feedstocks.

13. The method of claim 11 further comprising the step of blending the leading candidate feedstock with one or more different feedstocks.

14. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of comparing a sample of a feedstock with a different sample of the same feedstock for quality control of the sample.

15. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of generating a cost value for the feedstock, and comparing the cost value generated for the feedstock with a market price of the same or different feedstock.

Assignments (3)

Continuity (8)