METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR ALERT GENERATION USING HEALTH, FITNESS, OPERATION, OR PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUALS
Provided herein are systems, methods and computer readable media for monitoring the health and fitness of an individual. An example method comprises correlating a tag to the individual and receiving tag derived data indicative of a location for the individual, or correlating a sensor to the individual and receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual. The method further comprises comparing the tag location data of the tag derived data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and/or comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models. A HFOP status is then determined for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and/or on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
1 . A method for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the method comprising:
receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models; and
determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
2 . The method according to claim 1 ,
wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data.
3 . The method according to claim 1 ,
wherein the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator.
4 . The method according to claim 1 ,
wherein the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
5 . (canceled)
6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual.
7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated the individual.
8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual.
9 .- 14 . (canceled)
15 . A computer program product for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models; and
determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
16 . The computer program product according to claim 15 ,
wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data.
17 . The computer program product according to claim 15 ,
wherein the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator.
18 . The computer program product according to claim 15 ,
wherein the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
19 . (canceled)
20 . The computer program product according to claim 15 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least role information associated with the individual.
21 . The computer program product according to claim 15 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated with the individual.
22 .- 27 . (canceled)
28 . An apparatus for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
compare the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models; and
determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
29 . The apparatus according to claim 28 , wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data.
30 . The apparatus according to claim 28 , wherein the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator.
31 . The apparatus according to claim 28 , wherein the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
32 . (canceled)
33 . The apparatus according to claim 28 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least role information associated with the individual.
34 . The apparatus according to claim 28 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated with the individual.
35 . The apparatus according to claim 28 , wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual.
36 .- 40 . (canceled)