METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DYNAMICS/KINETICS MODEL SELECTION
Provided herein are systems, methods and computer readable media for assessing the health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual. An example method comprises selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from a database and comparing it to tag location data. Another example method comprises selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model from a database and comparing it to the sensor-derived data.
1 . A method for assessing a health or fitness of an individual, the method comprising:
receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database;
comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
and
determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
2 .- 7 . (canceled)
8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
10 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending.
11 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range.
12 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
13 .- 20 . (canceled)
21 . A computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database;
comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
and
determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
22 .- 27 . (canceled)
28 . The computer program product according to claim 21 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
29 . The computer program product according to claim 21 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
30 . The computer program product according to claim 21 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending.
31 . The computer program product according to claim 21 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range.
32 . The computer program product according to claim 21 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
33 .- 40 . (canceled)
41 . An apparatus for assessing a health or fitness of an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
select an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database;
compare the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
and
determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
42 .- 47 . (canceled)
48 . The apparatus according to claim 41 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
49 . The apparatus according to claim 41 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
50 . The apparatus according to claim 41 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending.
51 . The apparatus according to claim 41 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range.
52 . The apparatus according to claim 41 , wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
53 .- 60 . (canceled)