Multiple viewshed analysis
View Patent ↗Viewshed intersection analysis and usage is disclosed. A plurality of object positions is obtained. Each object position is associated with a range. A relevant area is determined. Elevation data is obtained for a plurality of points in the relevant area. Lines of sight are evaluated between the plurality of points and the object positions within the associated ranges based on the elevation data. An interest zone comprising a subset of the plurality of points within the relevant area is determined.
1. A method comprising:
obtaining, from a first data source, a plurality of locations of events, wherein the events are a plurality of attack events;
associating the plurality of locations of the events with one or more associated ranges;
determining a relevant area within the one or more associated ranges of the plurality of locations of the events;
obtaining, from a second data source, elevation data for a plurality of points in the relevant area;
calculating, by one or more processors, an intersection of a plurality of viewsheds from the plurality of locations of the events based on the one or more associated ranges and the elevation data;
determining, based on said calculating, an interest zone within the relevant area, wherein the interest zone comprises a position of a source of the plurality of attack events;
wherein the method is performed by one or more computing devices.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:
providing a graphical user interface configured to display a map;
accepting the plurality of locations of the events based on user interaction with the map.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of rendering a navigable three-dimensional map comprising the plurality of locations of the events and the position of the source of the plurality of attack events.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the elevation data comprises terrain features and man-made features.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the plurality of locations of the events corresponds to a location of a photograph.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of attack events comprise one or more improvised explosive device (IED) detonations.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of locations of the events are associated with an elevation, wherein calculating the intersection of the plurality of viewsheds is further based on the elevation.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the position of the source of the plurality of attack events is a sniper location.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the position of the source of the plurality of attack events is a lookout point.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of attack events comprise one or more sniper attacks.
11. A non-transitory computer-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause one or more processors to carry out the steps of:
obtaining, from a first data source, a plurality of locations of events, wherein the events are a plurality of attack events;
associating the plurality of locations of the events with a range;
determining a relevant area within the associated ranges of the plurality of locations of the events;
obtaining, from a second data source, elevation data for a plurality of points in the relevant area;
calculating, by one or more processors, an intersection of a plurality of viewsheds from the plurality of locations of the events based on the one or more associated ranges and the elevation data;
determining, based on said evaluating, an interest zone within the relevant area, wherein the interest zone comprises a position of a source of the plurality of attack events.
12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions further cause the one or more processors to carry out the steps of:
providing a graphical user interface configured to display a map;
accepting the plurality of locations of the events based on user interaction with the map.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions further cause the one or more processors to carry out the step of rendering a navigable three-dimensional map comprising the plurality of locations of the events and the position of the source of the plurality of attack events.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the elevation data comprises terrain features and man-made features.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 wherein at least one of the plurality of locations of the events corresponds to a location of a photograph.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of attack events comprise one or more improvised explosive device (IED) detonations.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of locations of the events are associated with an elevation, wherein calculating the intersection of the plurality of viewsheds is further based on the elevation.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the position of the source of the plurality of attack events is a sniper location.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the position of the source of the plurality of attack events is a lookout point.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of attack events comprise one or more sniper attacks.