Systems and methods for steam generator tube analysis for detection of tube degradation
View Patent ↗The systems and methods of the invention pertain to analyzing steam generator tube data for the detection of wear. Further, the invention is capable of performing a comparison of current tube signal data to baseline or historic tube signal data, e.g., from previous and/or the first, in-service inspection of the steam generator. The systems and methods are automated and can generate results to show potential tube-to-tube contact wear areas as well as the progression of tube-to-tube gap reduction within a steam generator tube bundle. In certain embodiments, the invention is capable of comparing current and historical eddy current data to determine the difference that may be related to degradation or other interested phenomena, and of processing and trending historical comparison results to establish normal variance and detect abnormal variances.
1. A method of employing at least one robotically controlled eddy current sensor and at least one digital computing device to non-destructively assess a current condition of a number of tubes of a steam generator of a nuclear power plant, the method comprising:
collecting at a first time with a digital computing device and using an eddy current sensor received in and robotically advanced through each of at least some of the number of tubes, a historic data set at a U-bend region for each of at least some of the number of tubes, including signals generated by geometric aspects of the U-bend region;
collecting at a second time with a digital computing device and using an eddy current sensor received in and robotically advanced through each of at least some of the number of tubes, a current data set at a U-bend region for each of at least some of the number of tubes, including signals generated by U-bend structures;
combining at least a portion of the historic data set into a corresponding at least portion of the current data set with a digital computing device, comprising;
calibrating tube data signals in each of the historic data set and the current data set;
selecting one or more segments of interest in the historic data set;
merging a calibrated tube data signal corresponding to each of the one or more segments of interest of the historic data set into a corresponding location in a duplicate copy of the current data set; and
suppressing from the duplicate copy one or more data signals generated from the geometric aspects of the U-bend region; and
generating the duplicate copy separate from the historic data set and the current data set representative of a change in condition of a tube of the number of tubes between the first time and the second time.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the collecting at the first time the historic data set comprises collecting the historic data set prior to the time the steam generator is placed in service.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the collecting at the first time, the historic data set comprises collecting the historic data set during an in-service inspection of the steam generator.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
collecting at an additional time an additional historic data set for each of at least some of the number of tubes, the additional time being between the first time and the second time; and
comparing the current data set with both the historic data set and the additional historic data set to generate the another data set.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
collecting as the historic data set a set of amplitude and phase values for each of a plurality of data points in the U-bend region or other signal of interest for each of at least some of the number of tubes; and
collecting as the current data set a set of amplitude and phase values for each of a plurality of data points in the tube sheet transition region or the other signal of interest for each of at least some of the number of tubes.
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining a difference in operating parameters between a first set of instrumentation that was employed in collecting the historic data set and a second set of instrumentation that was employed in collecting the current data set; and
applying at least a portion of the difference in operating parameters to one of the historic data set and the current data set to scale the one of the historic data set and the current data set.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising reversing at least a portion of one of the historic data set and the current data set to enable comparison of the historic and current data sets despite collection of the historic and current data sets in opposite longitudinal directions along the tube.
8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising validating said another data set generated to confirm said suppressing from the merged data set aspects that were present in the historic data set was suitably performed, and to confirm acceptability of calibrated signal characteristics selected from the group consisting of signal amplitude, phase, pattern, signal width, and signal area.