IP Library Granted Patent US 9,537,732
Granted Patent B2
US 9,537,732 · App. 13/954,062 · Granted Jan 3, 2017

Methods and systems for improving website performance

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,537,732
App. No.
13/954,062
Granted
Jan 3, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems of the present invention allow for improving website performance. An exemplary method may comprise the steps of calculating a website quality score for a website (which may indicate the website's effectiveness), identifying changes to the website's attributes that would improve the website's quality score, and modifying the website to include such changes.

Claims (39)

1. A method, comprising:

evaluating, by at least one server computer, at least one attribute of a website, wherein said at least one attribute comprises a design attribute;

determining a plurality of website templates known to be successful;

comparing the design attribute against the plurality of website templates known to be successful;

calculating for the website, by said at least one server computer, a website quality score indicating an effectiveness of said website compared to a plurality of websites within a vertical, wherein said website quality score is a function of said design attribute;

identifying, by said at least one server computer, a change to said design attribute of said website that will improve said website quality score;

presenting, by said at least one server computer, the administrator of said website an option to modify said website to include said change to said design attribute; and

modifying, by said at least one server computer, said website to include said change.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said design attribute comprises an information accessibility metric, an aesthetic metric, or a mobile rendering metric.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said at least one attribute comprises a performance attribute.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein said performance attribute comprises a sales metric, a traffic metric, a SEQ metric, a loading speed metric, a mobile performance metric, or a data transference metric.

5. A method, comprising:

evaluating, by at least one server computer, at least one attribute of a first website, wherein said at least one attribute comprises a design attribute;

determining a plurality of website templates known to be successful;

comparing the design attribute against the plurality of website templates known to be successful;

calculating for the first website, by said at least one server computer, a first website quality score indicating an effectiveness of said first website compared to a plurality of websites within a vertical, wherein said first website quality score is a function of said design attribute of said first website;

identifying, by said at least one server computer, a second website having a second website quality score indicating an effectiveness of said second website compared to the plurality of websites within the vertical, wherein said second website quality score exceeds said first website quality score;

determining, by said at least one server computer, at least one attribute of said second website causing said second website quality score to exceed said first website quality score; and

modifying, by said at least one server computer, said first website to include said at least one attribute of said second website.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein said design attribute comprises an information accessibility metric, an aesthetic metric, or a mobile rendering metric.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein said at least one attribute of said first website or said at least one attribute of said second website comprises a performance attribute.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein said performance attribute comprises a sales metric, a traffic metric, a SEQ metric, a loading speed metric, a mobile performance metric, or a data transference metric.

9. The method of claim 5 , wherein said first website and said second website are hosted by a common hosting provider.

10. A system, comprising:

a server computer communicatively coupled to a network and hosting a website;

an application server computer communicatively coupled to said network and running a website scoring and improvement module configured to:

evaluate at least one attribute of the website, wherein said at least one attribute comprises a design attribute;

determining a plurality of website templates known to be successful;

comparing the design attribute against the plurality of website templates known to be successful;

calculate a website quality score for said website, said website quality score indicating an effectiveness of said website compared to a plurality of websites within a vertical, wherein said website quality score is a function of said at least one attribute;

identify a change to at least one attribute that will improve said website quality score; and

modify said website to include said change.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein said design attribute comprises an information accessibility metric, an aesthetic metric, or a mobile rendering metric.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein said at least one attribute comprises a performance attribute.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein said performance attribute comprises a sales metric, a traffic metric, a SEQ metric, a loading speed metric, a mobile performance metric, or a data transference metric.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein said application computer if further configured to present an administrator of said website an option to modify said website to include said change to said at least one attribute.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein said application server computer is further configured to identify said change to said at least one attribute that will improve said website quality score by:

identifying a second website having a second website quality score indicating an effectiveness of said second website, wherein said second quality score exceeds said website quality score; and

determining at least one attribute of said second website causing said second website quality score to exceed said first website quality score.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 17, 2023
From: GO DADDY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC; GD FINANCE CO, LLC; GODADDY MEDIA TEMPLE INC.; GODADDY.COM, LLC; LANTIRN INCORPORATED; POYNT, LLC
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
Reel/Frame 062782/0489 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 3, 2013
From: GO DADDY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 031338/0443 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2013
From: MUKHERJEE, RAJATISH; NIJJER, RAJINDER; RAO, KETAKI
To: GO DADDY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 030920/0252 →