IP Library Granted Patent US 9,356,948
Granted Patent B2
US 9,356,948 · App. 13/958,480 · Granted May 31, 2016

Collaborative phishing attack detection

Inventors: Aaron Higbee (Leesburg, VA); Rohyt Belani (New York, NY); Scott Greaux (Glenmont, NY)
Assignee: PhishMe, Inc.
H04L63/1433H04L63/1416H04L63/1466H04L63/1483
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,356,948
App. No.
13/958,480
Granted
May 31, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are methods, network devices and machine-readable storage media for detecting whether a message is a phishing attack based on the collective responses from one or more individuals who have received that message. The individuals may flag the message as a possible phishing attack, and/or may provide a numerical ranking indicating the likelihood that the message is a possible phishing attack. As responses from different individuals may have a different degree of reliability, each response from an individual may be weighted with a corresponding trustworthiness level of that individual, in an overall determination as to whether a message is a phishing attack. A trustworthiness level of an individual may indicate a degree to which the response of that individual can be trusted and/or relied upon, and may be determined by how well that individual recognized simulated phishing attacks.

Claims (53)

1. A method, comprising:

generating, by a network device, a simulated phishing email, the simulated phishing email comprising a first header, wherein the simulated phishing email is a non-malicious email that resembles a phishing attack, and wherein the first header identifies the simulated phishing email as non-malicious;

electronically storing the first header in a computerized data store;

receiving, by the network device from a computing device associated with an individual, a notification triggered by a user interface action by the individual that an email delivered in an account associated with the individual has been identified by the individual as a possible phishing attack;

in response to receiving the notification, determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack by comparing the first header stored in the data store to one or more headers of the identified email, said determining occurring at the network device or at the computing device;

when the identified email is determined to be a known simulated phishing attack based on the comparison of the first header stored in the computerized data store to the one or more headers of the identified email, electronically recording that the individual has correctly identified the identified email as a possible phishing attack and providing feedback to the individual confirming that the identified email was a simulated phishing attack; and

when the identified email is determined not to be a known simulated phishing attack based on the comparison of the first header stored in the computerized data store to the one or more headers of the identified email, sending the identified email to a computer security technician for review or to an email address configured to receive the identified email or to a computer configured to detect whether or not the identified email is a threat or real phishing attack.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein sending the identified email further comprises sending the identified email to a computer security technician for analysis to determine if the identified email is a real phishing attack or not.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein sending the identified email further comprises sending the identified email to computer configured to detect phishing attacks to determine if the identified email is a real phishing attack or not.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein if the identified email is determined not to be a known simulated phishing attack, and processing of the identified email results in a determination that the identified email is a real phishing attack, providing feedback to the individual that identified the identified email as a possible phishing attack confirming that the identified email was a real phishing attack.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a single graphical user interface action performed by the individual is sufficient to trigger the notification to be sent from the computing device of the individual.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack comprises comparing the identified email or a portion of the identified email with simulated phishing attacks.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack comprises analyzing one or more characteristics of the identified email at a client-side plug-in.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a plug-in at an email client, wherein the plug-in further provides a single graphical user interface action to be performed by the individual for triggering the notification to be sent from the computing device of the individual.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computerized data store electronically storing the first header is at a client-side device, and wherein the determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack is executed at the client-side device.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computerized data store electronically storing the first header is at a network server device, and wherein the determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack is executed at the network server device.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising searching through a log of simulated phishing attacks to determine whether the identified email is a simulated phishing attack.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack is performed at a client-side plug-in executing at the computing device.

13. A system comprising:

a processor;

a storage device connected to the processor;

a network server device; and

a set of instructions on the storage device that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor perform the steps of:

generating, by a network device, a simulated phishing email, the simulated phishing email comprising a first header, wherein the simulated phishing email is a non-malicious email that resembles a phishing attack, and wherein the first header identifies the simulated phishing email as non-malicious;

electronically storing the first header in a computerized data store;

receiving, by the network device from a computing device associated with an individual, a notification triggered by a user interface action by the individual that an email delivered in an account associated with the individual has been identified by the individual as a possible phishing attack;

in response to receiving the notification, determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack by comparing the first header stored in the data store to one or more headers of the identified email, said determining occurring at the network device or at the computing device;

when the identified email is determined to be a known simulated phishing attack based on the comparison of the first header stored in the data store to the one or more headers of the identified email, electronically recording that the individual has correctly identified the identified email as a possible phishing attack and providing feedback to the individual confirming that the identified email was a simulated phishing attack; and

when the identified email is determined not to be a known simulated phishing attack based on the comparison of the first header stored in the computerized data store to the one or more headers of the identified email, sending the identified email to a computer security technician for review or to an email address configured to receive the identified email or to a computer configured to detect whether or not the identified email is a threat or real phishing attack.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein sending the identified email further comprises sending the identified email to a computer security technician for analysis to determine if the identified email is a real phishing attack or not.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein sending the identified email further comprises sending the identified email to computer configured to detect phishing attacks to determine if the identified email is a real phishing attack or not.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein if the identified email is determined not to be a known simulated phishing attack, and processing of the identified email results in a determination that the identified email is a real phishing attack, providing feedback to the individual that identified the identified email as a possible phishing attack confirming that the identified email was a real phishing attack.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein a single graphical user interface action performed by the individual is sufficient to trigger the notification to be sent from the computing device of the individual.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack comprises comparing a characteristic of the identified email with a characteristic of a transmitted simulated phishing attack.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the characteristic of the identified email message includes one or more of a sender identifier of the identified email, a recipient identifier of the identified email, a subject of the identified email, a time of transmission of the identified email, and a header of the identified email.

20. The system of claim 13 , wherein determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack comprises comparing the identified email or a portion of the identified email with simulated phishing attacks.

21. The system of claim 13 , wherein determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack comprises analyzing one or more characteristics of the identified email at a client-side plug-in.

22. The system of claim 13 , further comprising providing a plug-in at an email client, wherein the plug-in further provides a single graphical user interface action to be performed by the individual for triggering the notification to be sent from the computing device of the individual.

23. The system of claim 13 , wherein the computerized data store electronically storing the first header is at a client-side device, and wherein the determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack is executed at the client-side device.

24. The system of claim 13 , wherein the computerized data store electronically storing the first header is at a network server device, and wherein the determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack is executed at the network server device.

25. The method of claim 13 , further comprising searching through a log of simulated phishing attacks to determine whether the identified email is a simulated phishing attack.

26. The method of claim 13 , wherein the determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack is performed at a client-side plug-in executing at the computing device.

27. A method, comprising:

generating, by a network device, a simulated phishing email, the simulated phishing email comprising a first header, wherein the simulated phishing email is a non-malicious email that resembles a phishing attack, and wherein the first header identifies the simulated phishing email as non-malicious;

electronically storing the first header in a computerized data store;

receiving, by the network device from a computing device associated with an individual, a notification triggered by a user interface action by the individual that an email delivered in an account associated with the individual has been identified by the individual as a possible phishing attack;

in response to receiving the notification, determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack by comparing the first header stored in the data store to one or more headers of the identified email, said determining occurring at the network device or at the computing device;

sending at least one of the one or more headers of the identified email to the network device; and

when the identified email is determined to be a known simulated phishing attack based on the comparison of the first header stored in the computerized data store to the one or more headers of the identified email, electronically recording that the individual has correctly identified the identified email as a possible phishing attack and providing feedback to the individual confirming that the identified email was a simulated phishing attack; and

when the identified email is determined not to be a known simulated phishing attack based on the comparison of the first header stored in the computerized data store to the one or more headers of the identified email, sending the identified email to a computer security technician for review or to an email address configured to receive the identified email or to a computer configured to detect whether or not the identified email is a threat or real phishing attack.

28. The method of claim 16 , wherein the determining whether the identified email is a known simulated phishing attack is performed at a client-side plug-in executing at the computing device.

29. The method of claim 16 , wherein a single graphical user interface action performed by the individual is sufficient to trigger the notification to be sent from the computing device of the individual.

30. The method of claim 16 , further comprising providing a plug-in at an email client, wherein the plug-in further provides a single graphical user interface action to be performed by the individual for triggering the notification to be sent from the computing device of the individual.

Assignments (9)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE BLUE TORCH FINANCE LLC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 059800 FRAME 0834. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded May 5, 2023
From: COFENSE INC.
To: BLUE TORCH FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 064381/0245 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2022
From: ORIX GROWTH CAPITAL, LLC
To: COFENSE INC.; COFENSE BIDCO CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059864/0955 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2022
From: COFENSE INC.
To: BLUE TORCH CAPITAL LP
Reel/Frame 059800/0834 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2021
From: COFENSE BIDCO CORPORATION; COFENSE INC.
To: ORIX GROWTH CAPITAL, LLC, AS ADMINSTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 057692/0722 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 3, 2019
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: COFENSE, INC.
Reel/Frame 050616/0262 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 24, 2019
From: COFENSE INC.
To: ORIX GROWTH CAPITAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 050478/0889 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 15, 2019
From: PHISHME INC; POSEIDON MERGER SUB 2 INC; COFENSE INC
To: COFENSE INC
Reel/Frame 048014/0092 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2013
From: BELANI, ROHYT; HIGBEE, AARON; GRÉAUX, SCOTT
To: PHISHME, INC.
Reel/Frame 031663/0273 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 6, 2013
From: PHISHME INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 031597/0315 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 13918702 · Jun 14, 2013
Continuation In Part 13785252 · Mar 5, 2013
Continuation 13763538 · Feb 8, 2013
Related Publication 20140230061A1 · Aug 14, 2014