IP Library Granted Patent US 9,066,251
Granted Patent B2
US 9,066,251 · App. 13/958,888 · Granted Jun 23, 2015

Global and local optimization of Wi-Fi access points

Inventors: Ritesh K. Madan (Jersey City, NJ); Vikram Chandrasekhar (Mountain View, CA); Andrea Goldsmith (Menlo Park, CA); Santhosh Krishna (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: wildfire.exchange, inc.
H04W24/02H04W24/10H04W16/14H04W84/12H04W88/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,066,251
App. No.
13/958,888
Granted
Jun 23, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of managing Wi-Fi access points (APs) includes selecting between a global optimization and a local optimization of AP parameters based at least in part on one or more factors. The method includes causing a global optimization to be performed in the event that a global optimization is selected, the global optimization comprising: searching for adjustments to a first set of AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a global region, the global region including a first set of APs. The method includes causing a local optimization to be performed in the event that a local optimization is selected, the local optimization comprising: searching for adjustments to a second set of AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a localized region, the localized region including a second set of APs, wherein the second set of APs comprises a subset of the first set of APs.

Claims (61)

1. A method of managing Wi-Fi access points (APs), comprising:

selecting by a processor between a global optimization and a local optimization of Wi-Fi AP parameters based at least in part on one or more factors;

causing a global optimization to be performed in the event that a global optimization is selected, the global optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a first set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a global region, the global region including a first set of APs; and

causing a local optimization to be performed in the event that a local optimization is selected, the local optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a second set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a localized region, the localized region including a second set of APs, wherein the second set of APs comprises a subset of the first set of APs;

determining a portion of the second set of APs, wherein determining a portion of the second set of APs comprises determining the portion using a heuristic, and wherein the heuristic determines the portion as the portion of the second set of APs with performance below a predetermined performance target level;

searching for adjustments to Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the portion of the second set of APs; and

keeping the Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the remaining portion of the second set of APs unchanged.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a portion of the second set of APs comprises determining the portion using a heuristic, and wherein the heuristic determines the portion comprising the APs with the most performance degradation within a time interval.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the local optimization further comprises:

selecting an AP as a center point of the localized region.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the local optimization further comprises:

determining the portion of the second set of APs based on a number of hops from the center point.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the local optimization further comprises:

determining the localized region based on a number of hops from the center point.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the AP selected as the center point comprises a failed AP.

7. The method of claim 3 , wherein the AP selected as the center point comprises a new AP.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more factors include one or more of the following: a degree of network topology change, a degree of network condition change, a time period between local optimizations, a time period between global optimizations, computational complexity, and performance gain.

9. A system for managing Wi-Fi access points (APs), comprising:

a processor configured to:

select between a global optimization and a local optimization of Wi-Fi AP parameters based at least in part on one or more factors;

cause a global optimization to be performed in the event that a global optimization is selected, the global optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a first set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a global region, the global region including a first set of APs; and

cause a local optimization to be performed in the event that a local optimization is selected, the local optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a second set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a localized region, the localized region including a second set of APs, wherein the second set of APs comprises a subset of the first set of APs;

determining a portion of the second set of APs, and wherein determining a portion of the second set of APs comprises determining the portion using a heuristic, and wherein the heuristic determines the portion as the portion of the second set of APs with performance below a predetermined performance target level;

searching for adjustments to Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the portion of the second set of APs; and

keeping the Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the remaining portion of the second set of APs unchanged; and

a memory coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein determining a portion of the second set of APs comprises determining the portion using a heuristic, and wherein the heuristic determines the portion comprising the APs with the most performance degradation within a time interval.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the local optimization further comprises:

selecting an AP as a center point of the localized region.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the local optimization further comprises:

determining the portion of the second set of APs based on a number of hops from the center point.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the local optimization further comprises:

determining the localized region based on a number of hops from the center point.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the AP selected as the center point comprises a failed AP.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the AP selected as the center point comprises a new AP.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more factors include one or more of the following: a degree of network topology change, a degree of network condition change, a time period between local optimizations, a time period between global optimizations, computational complexity, and performance gain.

17. A computer program product for managing Wi-Fi access points (APs), the computer program product being embodied in a tangible non-transitory computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:

selecting between a global optimization and a local optimization of Wi-Fi AP parameters based at least in part on one or more factors;

causing a global optimization to be performed in the event that a global optimization is selected, the global optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a first set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a global region, the global region including a first set of APs; and

causing a local optimization to be performed in the event that a local optimization is selected, the local optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a second set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a localized region, the localized region include a second set of APs, wherein the second set of APs comprises a subset of the first set of APs; and

determining a portion of the second set of APs, wherein determining a portion of the second set of APs comprises determining the portion using a heuristic, and wherein the heuristic determines the portion as the portion of the second set of APs with performance below a predetermined performance target level;

searching for adjustments to Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the portion of the second set of APs; and

keeping the Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the remaining portion of the second set of APs unchanged.

18. The computer program product recited in claim 17 , wherein the one or more factors include one or more of the following: a degree of network topology change, a degree of network condition change, a time period between local optimizations, a time period between global optimizations, computational complexity, and performance gain.

19. The computer program product recited in claim 17 , wherein the local optimization comprises:

selecting an AP as a center point of the localized region.

20. A method of managing Wi-Fi access points (APs), comprising:

selecting by a processor between a global optimization and a local optimization of Wi-Fi AP parameters based at least in part on one or more factors;

causing a global optimization to be performed in the event that a global optimization is selected, the global optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a first set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a global region, the global region including a first set of APs; and

causing a local optimization to be performed in the event that a local optimization is selected, the local optimization comprising:

searching for adjustments to a second set of Wi-Fi AP parameters that optimize an overall performance associated with a localized region, the localized region including a second set of APs, wherein the second set of APs comprises a subset of the first set of APs;

determining a portion of the second set of APs, wherein determining a portion of the second set of APs comprises determining the portion using a heuristic, and wherein the heuristic determines the portion comprising the APs with the most performance degradation within a time interval;

searching for adjustments to Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the portion of the second set of APs; and

keeping the Wi-Fi AP parameters corresponding to the remaining portion of the second set of APs unchanged.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 21, 2017
From: WILDFIRE.EXCHANGE, INC.
To: PLUME DESIGN, INC.
Reel/Frame 041311/0104 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 15, 2015
From: ACCELERA, INC.
To: WILDFIRE.EXCHANGE, INC.
Reel/Frame 035204/0248 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 9, 2014
From: ACCELERA MOBILE BROADBAND, INC.
To: ACCELERA, INC.
Reel/Frame 033108/0054 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 27, 2013
From: MADAN, RITESH K.; CHANDRASEKHAR, VIKRAM; GOLDSMITH, ANDREA; KRISHNA, SANTHOSH
To: ACCELERA MOBILE BROADBAND, INC.
Reel/Frame 031303/0396 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 61680169 · Aug 6, 2012
Provisional Application 61698426 · Sep 7, 2012
Provisional Application 61705076 · Sep 24, 2012
Related Publication 20140036691A1 · Feb 6, 2014