IP Library Patent Application 14003126
Patent Application
App. No. 14/003,126

Estimating Costs of behavioral Targeting

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
14/003,126
Abstract

Systems ( 490 ), methods ( 100, 200 ), and computer-readable and executable instructions ( 324, 424 ) are provided for estimating costs of behavioral targeting. Estimating costs of behavioral targeting can include scoring a topic with a behavioral targeting model ( 101, 201 ). Estimating costs of behavioral targeting can also include obtaining a plurality of data items including geographic location information ( 102, 202 ). Estimating costs of behavioral targeting can also include detecting ( 104, 204 ) and scoring ( 209 ) a sentiment from filtered data items regarding a topic within a region ( 104, 204 ). Estimating costs of behavioral targeting can include computing a penalty score for the topic in the region in response to the scored sentiment exceeding a threshold ( 213 ), ( 106, 206 ). Estimating costs of behavioral targeting can include adjusting the topic score in the region according to the penalty score ( 108, 208 ). Furthermore, estimating costs of behavioral targeting can include taking an action with respect to advertising based on the adjusted topic score ( 110, 210 ).

Claims (39)

1 . A computer-implemented method for estimating a cost of misclassification in a behavioral targeting model comprising:

scoring a topic with a behavioral targeting model;

obtaining a plurality of data items including geographic location information;

detecting and scoring a sentiment from filtered data items regarding a topic within a region;

computing a penalty score for the topic in the region in response to the scored sentiment exceeding a threshold;

adjusting the topic score in the region according to the penalty score; and

taking an action with respect to advertising based on the adjusted topic score.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method includes mapping the scored sentiment geographically by interpolating between the scored data items to fill the geographic mapping.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method includes interpolating between the scored data items to smooth the geographic mapping.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of data items includes at least one of a social media message, a text message, a telephone call, an electronic mail message, a voicemail message, and an answering machine message.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method includes filtering the data items by topic according to metadata.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method includes filtering the data items by a region including at least one of monitoring IP addresses, monitoring cellular towers, monitoring content of a social media message, monitoring content of a text message, and monitoring global tracking on portable devices.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting sentiment includes applying a sentiment dictionary to content of the plurality of data items.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the method included adjusting the sentiment dictionary in response to changes in sentiment.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein taking an action with respect to advertising includes deciding whether or not to place an advertisement.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein taking an action with respect to advertising includes making a recommendation of whether or not to place an advertisement.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein taking an action with respect to advertising includes weighing the adjusted topic score relative to data specific to a user indicating that the sentiment of the user conflicts with the adjusted topic score.

12 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a set of instructions for estimating a cost of misclassification in a behavioral targeting model executable by the computer to cause the computer to:

score a topic with a behavioral targeting model;

obtain a plurality of data items including geographic location information;

filter the plurality of data items by a topic and a region;

detect a sentiment from the filtered data items regarding the topic within the region, wherein a sentiment dictionary is applied to the plurality of data items;

score the sentiment of the filtered data items regarding the topic in the region;

map the scored sentiment geographically, wherein interpolation is used to fill and smooth gaps in the geographic map of the scored sentiment;

compute a penalty score for the topic in the region in response to a scored sentiment that exceeds a threshold;

adjust the topic score in the region according to the penalty score; and

take an action with respect to advertising based on the adjusted topic score.

13 . The computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of data items includes at least one of a social media message, a text message, a telephone call, an electronic mail message, a voicemail message, and an answering machine message.

14 . The computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of data items are filtered by hashtags.

15 . A system for estimating a cost of misclassification in a behavioral targeting model, the system having a processor and memory for storing executable instructions that are executable by the processor to:

score a topic with a behavioral targeting model;

obtain a plurality of data items including geographic location information;

filter the plurality of data items by a topic and a region according to hashtags;

detect a sentiment from the filtered data items regarding the topic within the region by use of a sentiment dictionary that can be adjusted to respond to changes in sentiment;

score the sentiment of the filtered data items regarding the topic in the region;

map the scored sentiment geographically, wherein interpolation is used to fill gaps in the geographic map of the scored sentiment;

compute a penalty score for the topic in the region in response to a scored sentiment that exceeds a threshold;

adjust the topic score in the region according to the penalty score; and

take an action with respect to advertising based on the adjusted topic score.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 044183/0577 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC (F/K/A ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC)
Reel/Frame 063560/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 044183/0718 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC (F/K/A ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC); BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.; SERENA SOFTWARE, INC; ATTACHMATE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE INC. (F/K/A NOVELL, INC.); NETIQ CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062746/0399 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 25, 2020
From: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC
Reel/Frame 052010/0029 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC; ARCSIGHT, LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 044183/0577 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: ATTACHMATE CORPORATION; BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; NETIQ CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE, INC.; ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC; ARCSIGHT, LLC; SERENA SOFTWARE, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 044183/0718 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2017
From: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
To: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
Reel/Frame 042746/0130 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2015
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
To: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
Reel/Frame 037079/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2013
From: SCHOLZ, MARTIN B; RAJARAM, SHYAM SUNDAR; LUKOSE, RAJAN
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 031181/0094 →