IP Library Patent Application 14009915
Patent Application
App. No. 14/009,915

Power Difference Between SCell and PCell in a Carrier Aggregation System

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
14/009,915
Abstract

In accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, a method is disclosed. Determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC. In response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

Claims (30)

1 . A method comprising:

determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and

in response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , in which the first CC is one of a primary CC and a secondary CC, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC and the secondary CC.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a difference in received or transmitted power between the primary CC and the second CC.

4 . The method according to claim 2 , in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a power difference needed for the first or the second CC so that reception on the first CC is no longer degraded beyond an image tolerance threshold due to image interference caused by the second CC.

5 . The method according to claim 3 , in which the quantitative power difference comprises at least one of: RSRP difference; RSRQ difference; and network transmit power difference; and the interference is image interference.

6 . The method according to claim 2 , the method further comprising: after arranging the UL signaling, one of suspending measurements on the secondary CC or deconfiguring the secondary CC.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , in which the method is executed by a user equipment and the determining that downlink reception on the first CC is degraded due to interference caused by the second CC is based on an image tolerance threshold specific to the user-equipment.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , in which the determining that downlink reception on the first CC is degraded due to interference caused by the second CC is based on an absolute threshold provided by the network, the absolute threshold for one of RSRP, RSPQ, CQI or SNIR.

9 . A method comprising:

determining that a power difference among first and second CCs exceeds a tolerance threshold, in which the tolerance threshold is specific for a user equipment; and

in response to the determining, arranging uplink signaling to inform a network at least that the tolerance threshold was exceeded.

10 . The method according to claim 9 , in which the first CC is one of a primary CC/PCell and a secondary CC/SCell, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC/PCell and the secondary CC/SCell.

11 . The method according to claim 10 , in which the uplink signaling comprises a bit whose value informs the network that the tolerance threshold was exceeded.

12 . The method of claim 10 , in which the UL signaling is further arranged to inform the network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and to further identify which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

13 . The method according to claim 12 , in which the quantitative power difference comprises at least one of: RSRP difference; RSRQ difference; and network transmit power difference.

14 . The method according to claim 9 , in which the uplink signaling comprises, for each of the first and second CCs, values of at least one of: measured RSRP, measured RSRQ, calculated transmit power, and CQI.

15 . The method according to claim 9 , in which the uplink signaling comprises a power change needed for the first or the second CC so that the power difference would no longer exceed the threshold.

16 . An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code

the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following: determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and

in response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

17 . The apparatus according to claim 16 , in which the first CC is one of a primary CC and a secondary CC, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC and the secondary CC.

18 . The apparatus according to claim 17 , in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a difference in received or transmitted power between the primary CC and the second CC.

19 . A computer program, comprising:

code for determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and

code for arranging, in response to the determining, UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power; when the computer program is run on a processor.

20 . The computer program according to claim 19 , wherein the computer program is a computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium bearing computer program code embodied therein for use with a computer.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2019
From: OCO OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P. (F/K/A OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND LP
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 049246/0405 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2017
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, LP
Reel/Frame 043966/0574 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 19, 2014
From: NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS OY
To: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY
Reel/Frame 034294/0603 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 12, 2013
From: ROSA, CLAUDIO; VASENKARI, PETRI; KOSKELA, JARKKO T.; NIELSEN, SARI; MALKAMAKI, ESA; ALANEN, OLLI
To: NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS OY
Reel/Frame 031701/0929 →