IP Library Granted Patent US 9,563,745
Granted Patent B2
US 9,563,745 · App. 14/021,641 · Granted Feb 7, 2017

Medical care treatment decision support system

Inventors: Christopher Sharad Saigal (Beverly Hills, CA); Hollis Leech (Beverly Hills, CA)
Assignees: WiserCare, Inc.; The Regents of the University of California
G06F19/345G06N5/048
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,563,745
App. No.
14/021,641
Granted
Feb 7, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will assist patients with their investigation of, and decision making about, the treatments that are available to them using conjoint analysis methods that measure individual preferences for risk-associated treatment options, while maintaining an acceptable interview length. In exemplary embodiments, such individual preferences, known as “utilities” in economics literature, will be combined with evidence-based outcomes data regarding the probabilities of treatment outcomes; exemplary embodiments will use “decision analysis” and modified “conjoint analysis” methods, to dynamically generate for patients real-time individualized, evidence-based feedback, rankings and recommendations regarding medical treatment alternatives that are available to the patient based on the patient's medical condition and prognostic indicators.

Claims (11)

1. An Internet-based computer system for generating an individualized medical treatment decision analysis, said Internet-based computer system comprising at least one computer device programmed to:

in response to a particular user's input of a particular patient's patient-specific medical condition, patient-specific prognostic indicators for the particular patient, and preferences by the particular user regarding treatment attributes related to a plurality of treatment alternatives available to the particular patient for treating the particular patient's patient-specific medical condition in view of said patient-specific prognostic indicators:

derive conjoint-analysis-based, part-worth utility values for said treatment attributes from an individualized conjoint analysis of the particular user's input of preferences regarding said treatment attributes;

integrate said conjoint-analysis-based, part-worth utility values with a probability model of medical treatment outcome data for treatment alternatives available to said particular patient for said particular patient's patient-specific medical condition according to said patient-specific prognostic indicators and determine, according to said individualized conjoint analysis, a respective patient-specific expected value for each medical treatment alternative available to the particular patient for treating the particular patient's patient-specific medical condition in view of said patient-specific prognostic indicators; and

generate an individualized decision analysis of medical treatment alternatives available to said particular patient according to said individualized conjoint analysis of the particular user's input of preferences, said conjoint-analysis-based, part-worth utility values, said probability model, and said patient-specific expected values.

2. The Internet-based computer system of claim 1 , wherein said treatment attributes comprise risk-based treatment attributes.

3. The Internet-based computer system of claim 1 , wherein said treatment attributes comprise treatment factors selected from the group comprising: cost, insurance coverage, medical provider availability, medical provider quality, physician availability, and physician quality.

4. The Internet-based computer system of claim 1 , wherein said treatment attributes comprise risk-based treatment attributes and treatment factors selected from the group comprising: cost, insurance coverage, medical provider availability, medical provider quality, physician availability, and physician quality.

5. The Internet-based computer system of claim 1 , said generate an individualized decision analysis of medical treatment alternatives available to said particular patient comprising generating a display of said individualized decision analysis of medical treatment alternatives.

6. The Internet-based computer system of claim 1 , said at least one computer device further programmed to:

generate a display of said individualized decision analysis of medical treatment alternatives available to said particular patient.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF 50 PERCENT INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2016
From: WISERCARE, INC.
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORP.
Reel/Frame 039005/0313 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Mar 29, 2016
From: WISERCARE LLC
To: WISERCARE, INC.
Reel/Frame 038298/0872 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2016
From: SAIGAL, CHRISTOPHER SHARAD; LEECH, HOLLIS
To: WISERCARE LLC
Reel/Frame 038094/0329 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 13212073 · Aug 17, 2011
Provisional Application 61500517 · Jun 23, 2011
Provisional Application 61480282 · Apr 28, 2011
Provisional Application 61374551 · Aug 17, 2010
Related Publication 20140081898A1 · Mar 20, 2014