IP Library Granted Patent US 9,438,518
Granted Patent B2
US 9,438,518 · App. 14/103,149 · Granted Sep 6, 2016

Method and device for controlling DSP channels

Inventors: Detlef Georg (Cologne, DE); Gunter Marx (Muhlheim, DE); Roland Roth (Gelsenkirchen, DE); Norbert Schonfeld (Dortmund, DE); Michael Willmann (Witten, DE)
Assignee: Unify GmbH & Co. KG
H04L47/122G06F9/505H04L43/0882
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,438,518
App. No.
14/103,149
Granted
Sep 6, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described is a method for channel management on one or more digital signal processors. The method distinguishes itself by the fact that channel management occurs at any time based on a current load utilization of each digital signal processor, taking into account an actual load requirement of each channel and a maximum total performance capacity of each digital signal processor. The invention also relates to a device for carrying out the method.

Claims (73)

1. A method for channel management of digital signal processors in at least one communication device, the method comprising:

determining which digital signal processor (DSP) of the DSPs to send a new channel request to establish a communication channel by a process, each DSP having a number of supported codecs that have performance requirements, each of the DSPs having a maximum performance requirement that is a greatest performance requirement of all the codecs supported by that DSP and a minimum performance requirement that is a lowest performance requirement of all the codecs supported by that DSP, each of the DSPs also having a maximum hysteresis requirement and a maximum numeric performance value, the process comprising:

determining a current performance of each of the DSPs by adding a maximum hysteresis requirement and a maximum performance requirement to a current performance value stored in a performance table for the DSP,

identifying at least one of the DSPs as an available DSP for the new channel request upon determining that the determined current performance for that DSP is less than the maximum numeric performance value for that DSP,

determining that one of the at least one identified available DSP has a lowest load; and

nominating the identified available DSP determined to have the lowest load to have the new channel request assigned to that identified available DSP.

2. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

adjusting the performance table for the nominated DSP to account for a processing load that is associated with the new channel request in response to the nominating of that DSP.

3. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

directing the new channel request to the nominated DSP;

computing a current performance of the nominated DSP by a DSP load controller for that nominated DSP in response to receiving the new channel request;

adding the maximum performance requirement and the maximum hysteresis requirement to the computed current performance of the nominated DSP to identify a performance sum by the DSP load controller; and

accepting the new channel request by the DSP load controller upon a determination that the performance sum for the nominated DSP is less than the maximum numeric performance value for that DSP.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the accepting of the new channel request by the DSP load controller comprises:

identifying a codec for the new channel request by the DSP load controller;

correcting a channel assignment of the nominated DSP for a channel of the new channel request in response to identifying the codec for the new channel request.

5. The method of claim 4 , comprising:

updating a current performance value for the nominated DSP in a performance table with a current performance of the nominated DSP that is determined after the channel assignment of the nominated DSP is corrected.

6. The method of claim 3 , comprising:

receiving a request for a codec change to change a codec for a channel of the nominated DSP that was assigned to the new channel request from a first codec to a second codec;

adjusting the current performance value for the nominated DSP to account for a change in codec from the first codec to the second codec identified in the received request for a codec change and comparing the adjusted current performance value to the maximum numeric performance value for the nominated DSP;

accepting the codec change of the request for the codec change when the maximum numeric performance value is greater than the adjusted current performance value; and

rejecting the codec change of the request for the codec change when the maximum numeric performance value is less than the adjusted current performance value.

7. The method of claim 6 , comprising:

adjusting the codec for the channel to be the second codec that was identified in the request for the codec change in response to accepting the codec change.

8. The method of claim 7 , comprising:

updating a channel assignment table for the nominated DSP to account for the change in codec to the second codec made in response to the request for the codec change; and

reporting the current performance value for the nominated DSP that results from the adjusting of the codec.

9. The method of claim 8 , comprising:

updating of the performance table for the nominated DSP in response to the reporting of the current performance value for the nominated DSP that results from the adjusting of the codec.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the adjusting of the current performance value for the nominated DSP to account for the change in codec from the first codec to the second codec identified in the received request for the codec change and comparing the adjusted current performance value to the maximum numeric performance value for the nominated DSP is performed by the DSP load controller for the nominated DSP;

the adjusting of the codec for the channel to be the second codec identified in the request for the codec change in response to accepting the codec change is performed by the DSP load controller; and

the updating of the channel assignment table for the nominated DSP to account for the change in codec to the second codec made in response to the request for the codec change is performed by the DSP load controller.

11. The method of claim 6 , comprising:

increasing the maximum hysteresis requirement for the nominated DSP in response to the rejecting of the codec change.

12. The method of claim 6 , comprising:

adjusting the maximum hysteresis requirement for the nominated DSP in response to the rejecting of the codec change.

13. A method for channel management of digital signal processors in at least one communication device, the method comprising:

determining which digital signal processor (DSP) of the DSPs to send a new channel request to establish a communication channel by a process, each DSP of the DSPs having a number of supported codecs that have performance requirements, each of the DSPs having a maximum performance requirement that is a greatest performance requirement of all the codecs supported by that DSP and a minimum performance requirement that is a lowest performance requirement of all the codecs supported by that DSP, each of the DSPs also having a maximum hysteresis requirement and a maximum numeric performance value, the process comprising:

determining a current performance of each of the DSPs by adding the maximum hysteresis requirement and the maximum performance requirement to a current performance value stored in a performance table for the DSP,

identifying at least one of the DSPs as an available DSP for the new channel request upon determining that the determined current performance for that DSP is less than the maximum numeric performance value for that DSP,

determining that one of the at least one identified available DSP has a lowest load;

nominating the identified available DSP determined to have the lowest load to have the new channel request assigned to that identified available DSP;

adjusting a performance table for the nominated DSP to account for the determined current performance of that DSP in response to the nominating of that DSP;

directing the new channel request to a DSP load controller for the nominated DSP;

computing a current performance of the nominated DSP by the DSP load controller in response to receiving the new channel request;

adding the maximum performance requirement and the maximum hysteresis requirement to the computed current performance of the nominated DSP by the DSP load controller to identify a performance sum;

accepting the new channel request by the DSP load controller upon a determination that the performance sum for the nominated DSP is less than the maximum numeric performance value for that DSP, the accepting of the new channel request by the DSP load controller comprising:

identifying a codec for the new channel request by the DSP load controller, and

correcting a channel assignment of the nominated DSP for a channel of the new channel request in response to identifying the codec for the new channel request; and

directing the new channel request to the nominated DSP in response to the accepting of the new channel request.

14. The method of claim 13 , comprising

updating a current performance value for the nominated DSP in a performance table with a current performance of the nominated DSP that is determined after the channel assignment of the nominated DSP is corrected and the new channel request is accepted by the DSP load controller.

15. The method of claim 13 , comprising:

receiving a request for a codec change for the channel of the nominated DSP that was assigned to the new channel request by the DSP load controller;

adjusting the current performance value for the nominated DSP to account for a change in codec identified in the received request and comparing the adjusted current performance value to the maximum numeric performance value for the nominated DSP by the DSP load controller;

accepting the codec change of the request for the codec change by the DSP load controller when the maximum numeric performance value is greater than the adjusted current performance value; and

rejecting the codec change of the request for the codec change by the DSP load controller when the maximum numeric performance value is less than the adjusted current performance value.

16. The method of claim 15 , comprising:

adjusting the codec for the channel of the nominated DSP to be the codec identified in the request for the codec change in response to accepting the codec change.

17. The method of claim 16 , comprising:

updating of a channel assignment table by the DSP load controller for the nominated DSP to account for the change in codec made in response to the request for the codec change; and

reporting the current performance value for the nominated DSP that results from the adjusting of the codec by the DSP load controller.

18. The method of claim 17 , comprising:

updating of the performance table for the nominated DSP by a processor running a DSP load balancing process in response to the reporting of the current performance value for the nominated DSP that results from the adjusting of the codec.

19. The method of claim 13 , comprising:

receiving a request for a codec change for the channel of the nominated DSP that was assigned to the new channel request by the DSP load controller;

adjusting the current performance value for the nominated DSP to account for a change in codec identified in the received request and comparing the adjusted current performance value to the maximum numeric performance value for the nominated DSP by the DSP load controller;

rejecting the codec change of the request for the codec change by the DSP load controller upon a determination that the maximum numeric performance value is less than the adjusted current performance value; and

increasing the maximum hysteresis requirement for the nominated DSP in response to the rejecting of the codec change.

20. A communication device comprising:

a host processor, non-transitory memory that is communicatively connected to the host processor and a plurality of digital signal processors communicatively connected to the non-transitory memory, each of the digital signal processors configured to encode and decode signals transmitted along at least one communication channel assigned to the digital signal processor;

the communication device configured to perform the method for channel management of the digital signal processors of the communication device in accordance with the method of claim 1 .

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2025
From: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
To: MITEL (DELAWARE), INC.; MITEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; MITEL NETWORKS, INC.; MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 071712/0821 →
NOTICE OF SUCCCESSION OF AGENCY - PL Recorded Jan 14, 2025
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS LEGAL SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Reel/Frame 069895/0755 →
NOTICE OF SUCCCESSION OF AGENCY - 3L Recorded Jan 14, 2025
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS LEGAL SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Reel/Frame 070006/0268 →
NOTICE OF SUCCCESSION OF AGENCY - 2L Recorded Jan 14, 2025
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS LEGAL SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Reel/Frame 069896/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 24, 2024
From: UNIFY PATENTE GMBH & CO. KG
To: UNIFY BETEILIGUNGSVERWALTUNG GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 069242/0312 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 5, 2024
From: UNIFY PATENTE GMBH & CO. KG
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066197/0333 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 5, 2024
From: UNIFY PATENTE GMBH & CO. KG
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066197/0299 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 5, 2024
From: UNIFY PATENTE GMBH & CO. KG
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066197/0073 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2023
From: UNIFY GMBH & CO. KG
To: UNIFY PATENTE GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 065627/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 13, 2014
From: GEORG, DETLEF; MARX, GUENTER; ROTH, ROLAND; SCHONFELD, NORBERT; WILLMANN, MICHAEL
To: UNIFY GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 032431/0564 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2012 024 881 · Dec 19, 2012 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20140169165A1 · Jun 19, 2014