IP Library Granted Patent US 9,128,860
Granted Patent B2
US 9,128,860 · App. 14/113,180 · Granted Sep 8, 2015

Method of imaging reagent beads, analyzing, and redistributing intensity

Inventor: Dean Eric Sequera (Vienna, VA)
Assignee: Dynex Technologies, Inc.
G06F19/10G06F19/20G06F19/24
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,128,860
App. No.
14/113,180
Granted
Sep 8, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of analyzing reagent beads retained in a sample well of a sample plate is disclosed comprising obtaining an image of a reagent bead, distributing intensity values of image pixels amongst a plurality of intensity bins and generating an histogram. A curve is fitted to the histogram and the curve is compared with an idealized profile of image pixels. A closeness of fit between the curve and the idealized profile is determined and then intensity values are discarded from one or more of the intensity bins. The remaining intensity values are redistributed and the process is repeated several times. A determination is then made as to which curve has the closest fit with the idealized profile.

Claims (31)

1. A method of analysing one or more reagent beads or macrobeads retained or secured in a sample well of a sample plate, said method comprising:

(i) obtaining an image of the one or more reagent beads or macrobeads retained or secured in the sample well of the sample plate, said image comprising a plurality of image pixels each having an associated intensity value;

(ii) distributing the intensity values or values related to said intensity values of said image pixels amongst a plurality of intensity bins and generating an histogram;

(iii) fitting a curve to said histogram;

(iv) comparing said curve with an idealised profile of image pixels expected to be observed if an image of a reagent bead or macrobead which was unaffected by light emanating from neighbouring reagents beads or macrobeads was analysed;

(v) determining a closeness of fit between said curve and said idealised profile;

(vi) discarding intensity values or values related to said intensity values from the highest intensity bin and redistributing the remaining intensity values or values related to said intensity values amongst a plurality of intensity bins and generating a further histogram, wherein said step of redistributing said remaining intensity values or values related to said intensity values comprises maintaining the number of intensity bins substantially the same and assigning a new reduced intensity range to each of the intensity bins;

(vii) repeating steps (iii)-(vi) a plurality of times;

(viii) determining which curve has the closest fit with said idealised profile; and

(ix) determining the intensity of said reagent bead or macrobead by summing the intensity values or values related to said intensity values which were not discarded and which were distributed amongst said plurality of intensity bins which gave the curve having the closest fit with said idealised profile.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said step of distributing the intensity values comprises:

determining a logarithm of said intensity values; and

distributing the logarithm of said intensity values amongst a plurality of intensity bins and generating a first histogram.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein either:

(i) said logarithm comprises a binary, natural or common logarithm; or

(ii) the base of said logarithm has a value 2, e or 10; or

(iii) the base of said logarithm has a value in the range 2-10 or 10-20 or >20.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein:

(i) said curve comprises a 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th or higher order polynomial; and/or

(ii) the step of comparing said curve with said idealised profile comprises determining the closeness of fit of said curve with said idealised profile; and/or

(iii) the step of comparing said curve with said idealised profile comprises determining a first sum which equals the sum of the squares of the differences between said curve and said idealised profile.

5. The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein:

(i) said curve comprises a 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th or higher order polynomial; and/or

(ii) the step of comparing said curve with said idealised profile comprises determining the closeness of fit of said curve with said idealised profile; and/or

(iii) the step of comparing said curve with said idealised profile comprises determining a first sum which equals the sum of the squares of the differences between said curve and said idealised profile.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

(i) said curve comprises a 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th or higher order polynomial; and/or

(ii) the step of comparing said curve with said idealised profile comprises determining the closeness of fit of said curve with said idealised profile; and/or

(iii) the step of comparing said curve with said idealised profile comprises determining a first sum which equals the sum of the squares of the differences between said curve and said idealised profile.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6 , further comprising determining which first sum indicates the closest fit between a curve and said idealised profile.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said plurality of intensity bins comprises <10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90-100 or >100 intensity bins.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY AGREEMENT (TERM LOAN) Recorded Aug 20, 2019
From: DYNEX TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.; DYNEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 050096/0860 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT (REVOLVING LOAN) Recorded Aug 20, 2019
From: DYNEX TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.; DYNEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 050096/0894 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2014
From: SEQUERA, DEAN ERIC
To: DYNEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 032500/0152 →
Priority Claims (4)
GB 1106699.0 · Apr 20, 2011 · national
EP 11170128 · Jun 16, 2011 · regional
GB 1110178.9 · Jun 16, 2011 · national
GB 1204935.9 · Mar 21, 2012 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20140052382A1 · Feb 20, 2014