APPLICATION EVALUATION
Systems and techniques are disclosed for receiving an application submitted to an application market and determining a global rank for the application based at least on a visibility rank and a risk rank. The visibility rank may be determined based on observed visibility, a probabilistic visibility, and/or an externality. The application may be placed in a review category based on the global rank. Additionally, an application priority category may be associated with the application based on the global rank.
1 . A method comprising:
receiving an application submitted to an application market;
determining a global rank for the application, the global rank based at least on:
a visibility rank;
a risk rank; and
placing the application in a review category based on the global rank.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to a probability of exposure, of the application, to a user.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to an observed visibility.
4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the observed visibility is based on one from the group consisting of: an impression, a velocity, a number of comments, a revenue, and a rating.
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to a probabilistic visibility.
6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the probabilistic visibility is based on one selected from the group consisting of: a campaign presence, a campaign size, a campaign rating, and a current event.
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to an externality.
8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the externality is one selected from the group consisting of: a social media outlet, a media outlet, a news outlet, an aggregation outlet, an entertainment outlet, and an educational outlet.
9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the visibility rank is based on application information.
10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the risk rank is generated automatically.
11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the risk rank is generated based on user input.
12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the risk rank is generated based on a factor selected from the group consisting of: a profanity level, a content maturity level, an incompatibility level, a secrecy level, and an automatically generated block.
13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the risk rank is based on application information.
14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining the visibility rank by a visibility rank generator; and
determining the risk rank by a risk rank generator.
15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the visibility rank generator and the risk rank generator are the same component.
16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the global rank occurs at a first time and further comprising updating the global rank at a second time.
17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein updating the global rank at the second time comprises updating one from the group consisting of; the visibility rank, and the risk rank.
18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the review category is one selected from the group consisting of: a null action, and an application flag.
19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the application flag further comprises taking an action selected from the group consisting of: a removal, a functionality test, and a quality test.
20 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising allocating a resource based the global rank.
21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein allocating the resource may correspond to a priority categorization.
22 . The method of claim 20 , wherein determining the global rank occurs at a first time and further comprising:
updating the global rank at a second time;
determining a change between the global rank at the first time and the global rank at the second time;
determining that the change exceeds a buffer threshold; and
allocating the resource based on determining that the change exceeds a buffer threshold.
23 . A system comprising:
a processor, the processor configured to:
receive an application submitted to an application market;
determine a global rank for the application, the global rank based at least on:
a visibility rank;
a risk rank; and
place the application in a review category based on the global rank.
24 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to a probability of exposure, of the application, to a user.
25 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to an observed visibility.
26 . The system of claim 25 , wherein the observed visibility is based on one from the group consisting of: an impression, a velocity, a number of comments, a revenue, and a rating.
27 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to a probabilistic visibility.
28 . The system of claim 27 , wherein the probabilistic visibility is based on one selected from the group consisting of: a campaign presence, a campaign size, a campaign rating, and a current event.
29 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the visibility rank corresponds to an externality.
30 . The system of claim 29 , wherein the externality is one selected from the group consisting of: a social media outlet, a media outlet, a news outlet, an aggregation outlet, an entertainment outlet, and an educational outlet.
31 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the visibility rank is based on application information.
32 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the risk rank is generated automatically.
33 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the risk rank is generated based on user input.
34 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the risk rank is generated based on a factor selected from the group consisting of: a profanity level, a content maturity level, an incompatibility level, a secrecy level, and an automatically generated block.
35 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the risk rank is based on application information.
36 . The system of claim 23 , wherein determining the global rank occurs at a first time and further comprising updating the global rank at a second time.
37 . The system of claim 36 , wherein updating the global rank at the second time comprises updating one from the group consisting of; the visibility rank, and the risk rank.
38 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the review category is one selected from the group consisting of: a null action, and an application flag.
39 . The system of claim 38 , wherein the application flag further comprises taking an action selected from the group consisting of: a removal, a functionality test, and a quality test.
40 . The system of claim 23 , further configured to allocate a resource based the global rank.
41 . The system of claim 40 , wherein allocating the resource may correspond to a priority categorization.
42 . The system of claim 40 , wherein determining the global rank occurs at a first time and further comprising:
updating the global rank at a second time;
determining a change between the global rank at the first time and the global rank at the second time;
determining that the change exceeds a buffer threshold; and
allocating the resource based on determining that the change exceeds a buffer threshold.