IP Library Granted Patent US 9,468,991
Granted Patent B2
US 9,468,991 · App. 14/164,539 · Granted Oct 18, 2016

Method determining hole completion

Inventors: Shamgar Elijah McDowell (Simpsonville, SC); Zhaoli Hu (Greer, SC); Abe Denis Darling (Laurens, SC); Douglas Anthony Serieno (Simpsonville, SC)
Assignee: General Electric Company
B23K26/03B23K26/032B23K26/0622B23K26/146B23K26/16B23K26/388B23K26/40B23K2201/001B23K2203/08B23K2203/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,468,991
App. No.
14/164,539
Granted
Oct 18, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides a method for determining a hole completing in laser drilling of a hole in a near wall of an airfoil. The method includes drilling a hole in the near wall of the airfoil using a laser drill. The laser drill may move in a pattern relative to the airfoil. The method also includes determining when the drilling of the hole is complete based on a calculated time duration between successive breakthroughs of a laser from the laser drill through the near wall of the airfoil, or based on a calculated time duration since the latest breakthrough of the laser from the laser drill through the near wall of the airfoil.

Claims (33)

1. A method for drilling a hole in an airfoil comprising:

drilling a hole in a near wall of the airfoil using a laser drill;

determining that the laser drill has broken through the near wall of the airfoil by sensing a change in a process condition indicative of a breakthrough;

calculating a time duration since determining that the laser drill has broken through the near wall of the airfoil, wherein calculating the time duration comprises continuing to sense the process condition to determine if the laser drill remains broken through; and

determining that the hole in the near wall of the airfoil is complete once the calculated time duration exceeds a predetermined amount of time;

wherein the time duration extends until the earlier of when the laser is no longer broken through the near wall of the airfoil or the time duration exceeds the predetermined amount of time.

2. The method as in claim 1 , wherein drilling the hole in the near wall of the airfoil using the laser drill comprises moving the laser drill relative to the airfoil.

3. The method as in claim 2 , wherein determining that the laser drill has broken through the near wall of the airfoil comprises determining a plurality of breakthroughs of the laser drill through the near wall of the airfoil while drilling the hole, and wherein calculating the time duration since the laser drill has broken through the near wall of the airfoil comprises calculating the time duration since the laser drill has most recently broken through the near wall of the airfoil while drilling the hole.

4. The method as in claim 3 , wherein calculating the time duration since the laser drill has most recently broken through the near wall of the airfoil comprising resetting the time duration in response to determining the laser drill is no longer broken through the near wall.

5. The method as in claim 2 , wherein moving the laser drill relative to the airfoil comprises moving the laser drill in a pattern relative to the laser drill.

6. The method as in claim 5 , wherein determining that the hole in the near wall of the airfoil is complete based on the calculated time duration comprises comparing the time duration to a predetermined amount of time corresponding to the pattern.

7. The method as in claim 5 , wherein the pattern is a spiral.

8. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the airfoil further defines a cavity and a far wall positioned opposite the cavity from the near wall, wherein the laser drill utilizes a laser configured as a confined laser beam, the confined laser beam comprising a laser beam within a fluid column, and wherein the method further comprises:

activating a back strike protection in the cavity of the airfoil; and

disrupting the confined laser beam in the cavity of the airfoil using the back strike protection.

9. The method as in claim 1 , wherein determining that the hole in the near wall of the airfoil is complete based on the calculated time duration comprises comparing the time duration to a predetermined amount of time.

10. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the laser drill is a confined laser drill utilizing a confined laser beam, and wherein the confined laser beam comprises a laser beam within a fluid column.

11. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the airfoil is an airfoil for a turbomachine.

12. The method as in claim 1 , wherein determining that the laser drill has broken through the near wall of the airfoil comprises sensing a change in a process condition indicative of the laser drill having broken through the near wall of the airfoil.

13. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the time duration includes only the amount of time the laser has been broken through the near wall of the airfoil.

14. A method for drilling a hole in an airfoil comprising:

drilling a hole in a near wall of the airfoil using a laser drill, the laser drill moving in a pattern relative to the airfoil;

determining a plurality of breakthroughs of the laser drill through the near wall while drilling the hole, wherein each breakthrough is determined by sensing a change in a process condition indicative of a breakthrough;

calculating a time duration between successive breakthroughs of the laser drill through the near wall of the airfoil, wherein calculating the time duration comprises continuing to sense the process condition to determine if the laser drill remains broken through; and

determining that the hole through the near wall is complete once the time duration between successive breakthroughs exceeds a predetermined amount of time;

wherein the time duration extends until the earlier of when the laser is no longer broken through the near wall of the airfoil or the time duration meets or exceeds the predetermined amount of time.

15. The method as in claim 14 , wherein the laser drill utilizes a confined laser beam, and wherein the confined laser beam comprises a laser beam within a fluid column.

16. The method as in claim 14 , wherein the hole is a cooling passage through the near wall to a cavity in the airfoil.

17. The method as in claim 14 , wherein determining that the hole through the near wall is complete based on the time between successive breakthroughs comprises comparing the calculated time duration to a predetermined amount of time corresponding to the pattern.

18. The method as in claim 14 , wherein the laser drill utilizes a laser configured as a confined laser beam, the confined laser beam comprising a laser beam within a fluid column, and further comprising:

activating a back strike protection in a cavity of the airfoil; and

disrupting the confined laser beam in the cavity of the airfoil using the back strike protection.

19. The method as in claim 14 , wherein the time duration includes only the amount of time the laser has been broken through the near wall of the airfoil.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2022
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: SYNOVA S.A.
Reel/Frame 061971/0058 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 30, 2014
From: DARLING, ABE DENIS
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 032090/0297 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2014
From: MCDOWELL, SHAMGAR ELIJAH; HU, ZHAOLI; DARLING, ABE DENIS; SERIENO, DOUGLAS ANTHONY
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 032051/0122 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150209900A1 · Jul 30, 2015