Enhanced data capture, analysis, and reporting for unified communications
View Patent ↗The present disclosure includes descriptions of various aspects of unified communication (UC) systems, including UC management and analysis systems and related tools and techniques. Described systems, tools, and techniques are adapted for enhanced UC data capture, analysis, and reporting; enhanced UC monitoring services; and a user survey service that can be used for conducting user surveys related to UC services. Embodiments disclosed herein include computer systems and methods that can be used for analyzing service level objectives for call quality, classifying calls into distinct categories, and real-time user notification of call quality and reliability issues.
1. A computer-implemented method comprising:
(a) rating audio call quality by evaluating quality metrics for a set of calls against a defined set of threshold values;
(b) determining site/time interval combinations for calls in the set of calls, wherein the determining comprises:
(i) discretizing the calls into time intervals by identifying the time intervals in which the respective calls took place; and
(ii) aggregating the discretized calls by site; and
(c) evaluating a number of calls rated as poor within each site/time interval combination against a service level compliance requirement.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein aggregating the discretized calls by site comprises grouping the discretized calls based on call endpoint subnet.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the quality metrics of each call of the set of calls is evaluated against the threshold values.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining that a time interval within a longer time period is a non-compliant time interval, wherein the non-compliant time interval within the longer time period results in non-compliance for the longer time period.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the time intervals are hours.
6. A computer-implemented method comprising:
for a call with two endpoints each having a quality classification, classifying the call based on the endpoint with the lowest quality classification;
further classifying the call based on geography;
further classifying the call based on infrastructure components; and
presenting a dashboard configured to provide call quality information for the call.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising further classifying the call based on federation.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the dashboard provides a filter selected from the group consisting of: a filter for geography hierarchy, a filter for call classification hierarchy, a filter for organization hierarchy, a filter for network hierarchy, and a filter for type of call.
9. A computer-implemented method comprising:
by a rule engine, monitoring a database for poor quality voice calls; and
by the rule engine, triggering an outbound notification of a poor quality voice call in which an end user participated to be delivered to the end user via a channel in accordance with one or more rules that apply to a usage scenario of the poor quality voice call.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein presence information is used to determine the channel to use for delivering the notification.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the presence information indicates that the end user is online and available.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , further comprising using an instant message to deliver the notification.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the presence information indicates that the end user is offline or unavailable.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising using an e-mail to deliver the notification.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the notification includes a link for providing feedback.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the notification includes one or more possible causes of poor voice quality.
17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein the one or more possible causes of poor voice quality include poor wireless connectivity.
18. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein the one or more possible causes of poor voice quality include an unsupported audio device.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the database is a quality of experience (QoE) database.