Relative quality score for video transcoding
View Patent ↗A relative quality score is provided that takes into account properties of an encoded version of a source video. For example, one such quality score calculates a difference of higher and lower quality transcoded versions of the source video, and computes quality metrics for each to evaluate how similar the transcoded versions are to the source video. A relative quality score quantifying the quality improvement of the high-quality version over the low-quality version is computed. The relative quality score is adjusted based on a measurement of the quality of the source video. If the relative quality score for the video indicates a sufficient quality improvement of the high-quality version over the low-quality version, various actions are taken, such as retaining the high-quality version, and making the high-quality version available to users, e.g. via a video viewing user interface.
1. A computer-implemented method of determining whether to provide a high quality transcoded version of a source video stored in a video repository, comprising:
generating a low-quality transcoded version of the source video;
generating a high-quality transcoded version of the source video having higher quality than the low-quality transcoded version;
determining a relative quality score that quantifies a difference in quality between the high-quality transcoded version and the low-quality transcoded version;
determining a weighting factor as a function of a quality of the source video, the weighting factor configured to limit the relative quality score to an upper bound when the source video is of poor quality;
adjusting the relative quality score by applying the weighting factor to the relative quality score; and
responsive at least in part to the adjusted relative quality score indicating at least a threshold level of quality, storing the high-quality transcoded version of the video in the video repository.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the weighting factor comprises computing the weighting factor based on a number of frames per second in the source video.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the weighting factor comprises computing the weighting factor based on a blockiness measure associated with the source video, the blockiness measure indicating an extent to which blocks representing a frame in the source video have been encoded with an insufficient level of detail.
4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising determining the blockiness measure by measuring a difference in luminance values of pixels along a boundary of a first block representing the frame and pixels along a boundary of a second block representing the frame, the boundary of the first block being adjacent to the boundary of the second block.
5. The method of claim 3 , wherein computing weighting factor comprises setting the weighting factor to be a first value when the blockiness measure is lower than a blockiness threshold or a second value when the blockiness measure is higher than the blockiness threshold, the first value being lower than the second value.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein adjusting the relative quality score comprises multiplying the relative quality score by the weighting factor.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the difference in quality is based on a degree of similarity between the high-quality transcoded version and the source video and a degree of similarity between the low-quality transcoded version and the source video.
8. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program executable by a processor for determining whether to provide a high quality transcoded version of a source video stored in a video repository, the computer program controlling the processor to perform operations comprising:
generating a low-quality transcoded version of the source video;
generating a high-quality transcoded version of the source video having higher quality than the low-quality transcoded version;
determining a weighting factor as a function of a quality of the source video, the weighting factor configured to limit the relative quality score to an upper bound when the source video is of poor quality;
adjusting the relative quality score by applying the weighting factor to the relative quality score; and
responsive at least in part to the adjusted relative quality score indicating at least a threshold level of quality, storing the high-quality transcoded version of the video in the video repository.
9. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , the computer program controlling the processor to perform operations further comprising determining the weighting factor by computing the weighting factor based on a number of frames per second in the source video.
10. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , the computer program controlling the processor to perform operations further comprising determining the weighting factor by computing the weighting factor based on a blockiness measure associated with the source video, the blockiness measure indicating an extent to which blocks representing a frame in the source video have been encoded with an insufficient level of detail.
11. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , the computer program controlling the processor to perform operations further comprising determining the blockiness measure by measuring a difference in luminance values of pixels along a boundary of a first block representing the frame and pixels along a boundary of a second block representing the frame, the boundary of the first block being adjacent to the boundary of the second block.
12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein computing weighting factor comprises setting the weighting factor to be a first value when the blockiness measure is lower than a blockiness threshold or a second value when the blockiness measure is higher than the blockiness threshold, the first value being lower than the second value.
13. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein adjusting the relative quality score comprises multiplying the relative quality score by the weighting factor.
14. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the difference in quality based on a degree of similarity between the high-quality transcoded version and the source video and a degree of similarity between the low-quality transcoded version and the source video.
15. A computer system comprising:
a processor; and
a transcoding module executing on the processor, the transcoding module controlling the processor to perform operations comprising:
generating a low-quality transcoded version of the source video;
generating a high-quality transcoded version of the source video having higher quality than the low-quality transcoded version;
determining a weighting factor as a function of a quality of the source video, the weighting factor configured to limit the relative quality score to an upper bound when the source video is of poor quality;
adjusting the relative quality score by applying the weighting factor to the relative quality score; and
responsive at least in part to the adjusted relative quality score indicating at least a threshold level of quality, storing the high-quality transcoded version of the video in the video repository.
16. The computer system of claim 15 , the transcoding module controlling the processor to perform operations further comprising determining the weighting factor by computing the weighting factor based on a number of frames per second in the source video.
17. The computer system of claim 15 , the transcoding module controlling the processor to perform operations further comprising determining the weighting factor by computing the weighting factor based on a blockiness measure associated with the source video, the blockiness measure indicating an extent to which blocks representing a frame in the source video have been encoded with an insufficient level of detail.
18. The computer system of claim 17 , the transcoding module controlling the processor to perform operations further comprising determining the blockiness measure by measuring a difference in luminance values of pixels along a boundary of a first block representing the frame and pixels along a boundary of a second block representing the frame, the boundary of the first block being adjacent to the boundary of the second block.
19. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein computing weighting factor comprises setting the weighting factor to be a first value when the blockiness measure is lower than a blockiness threshold or a second value when the blockiness measure is higher than the blockiness threshold, the first value being lower than the second value.
20. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein adjusting the relative quality score comprises multiplying the relative quality score by the weighting factor.