IP Library Granted Patent US 9,804,150
Granted Patent B2
US 9,804,150 · App. 14/223,893 · Granted Oct 31, 2017

Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system

Inventors: Gary Alan Hayter (Oakland, CA); Geoffrey V. McGarraugh (Bodega Bay, CA); Andrew H. Naegeli (Walnut Creek, CA); John Charles Mazza (Long Beach, CA); Benjamin Jay Feldman (Berkeley, CA)
Assignee: Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
G01N33/49A61B5/1473A61B5/1495A61B5/14532G06F19/3456A61B2560/0223A61B2560/0252G06F19/3412G06F19/3437G06F19/3487
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,804,150
App. No.
14/223,893
Granted
Oct 31, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus for providing data processing and control for use in a medical communication system are provided.

Claims (22)

1. A method, comprising:

determining, using one or more processors, a sensitivity value for each of a predetermined number of analyte sensors;

determining, using the one or more processors, a sensitivity variation for each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors;

determining, using the one or more processors, a mean sensitivity based on the sensitivity value determined for each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors when it is determined that the determined sensitivity variations each do not exceed a tolerance threshold level;

associating, using the one or more processors, a sensor code with an analyte sensor batch associated with the predetermined number of analyte sensors when the mean sensitivity is within a predetermined sensitivity range; and

providing a plurality of packagings for the analyte sensor batch, each packaging including the sensor code.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensitivity variation for each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors is determined as a coefficient of variation.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensitivity value for each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors is determined in vitro.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the sensitivity value for each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors is performed during an analyte sensor manufacturing process.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensor code is used to calibrate the predetermined number of analyte sensors associated with the analyte sensor batch associated with the predetermined number of analyte sensors.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensor code is stored in an analyte monitoring device.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a response time for each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising determining a mean response time of the predetermined number of analyte sensors.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the mean response time is used for lag correction of data obtained using analyte sensors included in the analyte sensor batch associated with the predetermined number of analyte sensors.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors comprises a plurality of electrodes including a working electrode, wherein the working electrode comprises an analyte-responsive enzyme and a mediator, wherein at least one of the analyte-responsive enzyme and the mediator is chemically bonded to a polymer disposed on the working electrode, and wherein at least one of the analyte-responsive enzyme and the mediator is crosslinked with the polymer.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, upon determining that the determined sensitivity variation for an analyte sensor of the predetermined number of analyte sensors exceeds the tolerance threshold level, rejecting the analyte sensor batch associated with the predetermined number of analyte sensors.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the sensitivity value for each of the predetermined number of analyte sensors further includes determining if each of the determined sensitivity values are within a predetermined range.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising rejecting the analyte sensor batch associated with the predetermined number of analyte sensors when a predetermined number of the determined sensitivity values are not within the predetermined range.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the mean sensitivity includes determining if the determined mean sensitivity is within the predetermined sensitivity range.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising rejecting the analyte sensor batch associated with the predetermined number of analyte sensors when the determined mean sensitivity is not within the predetermined sensitivity range.

16. The method of claim 1 , further including sampling the predetermined number of analyte sensors during an analyte sensor manufacturing process.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the sampled predetermined number of analyte sensors is a subset of the analyte sensors in the analyte sensor batch.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2014
From: HAYTER, GARY; MCGARRAUGH, GEOFFREY V.; NAEGELI, ANDREW H.; MAZZA, JOHN C.; FELDMAN, BENJAMIN J.
To: ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC.
Reel/Frame 033346/0463 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 13567038 · Aug 4, 2012
Continuation 12152652 · May 14, 2008
Provisional Application 60917837 · May 14, 2007
Related Publication 20140207400A1 · Jul 24, 2014