IP Library Granted Patent US 9,336,638
Granted Patent B2
US 9,336,638 · App. 14/224,849 · Granted May 10, 2016

Media item validation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,336,638
App. No.
14/224,849
Filed
Mar 25, 2014
Granted
May 10, 2016
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3653
USPC
194/320
Abstract

A method of validating a media item, comprising: for each of a plurality of sensors that sense a media item, determining a respective validation score indicating a likelihood that the sensed media item is valid; and determining if the media item is valid responsive to the plurality of validation scores. Apparatus for validating a media item and a document processing module are also provided.

Claims (161)

1. A method of validating a media item, comprising:

for each of a plurality of sensors that sense a media item, determining, by a processor of a media validator, a respective validation score F indicating a likelihood that the sensed media item is valid;

determining, by the processor, if the media item is valid responsive to the plurality of validation scores by using a fuzzy logic approach rather than a voting-based approach;

comparing each respective validation score F to at least one predetermined threshold τ to generate a threshold result; and

responsive to said threshold result, determining a modified validation score x for each of said sensors; and

applying a membership function to each respective validation score F to determine said modified validation score x for each of said sensors, wherein the at least one membership function comprises said at least one predetermined threshold τ, wherein said membership function comprises:

{

x

=

1

if

F

τ

x

=

(

1

+

(

F

-

τ

)

+

(

F

-

τ

/

2

)

τ

/

2

)

/

2

if

τ

/

2

F

<

τ

x

=

0

if

F

<

τ

/

2

.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

combining the modified validation scores x for each sensor to determine a combined validation score y; and

generating a validation result responsive to said combined validation score y to determine if the media item is valid.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2 , further comprising:

applying a validation rule to said combined validation score y to determine said validation result, wherein said validation result is one of ‘genuine’, ‘suspect’ or ‘counterfeit’.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said validation rule comprises:

0.75≦y≦1=genuine;

0.5≦y<0.75=suspect; and

0≦y<0.5=counterfeit.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

applying a weighting factor ω to each of the plurality of sensors.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein a sum of the weighting factors is 1.

7. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein each weighting factor is selectively adjustable and/or optimizable.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said plurality of sensors comprises an optical image sensor and at least one of a magnetic sensor and an ultraviolet sensor.

9. A method of validating a media item, comprising:

for each of a plurality of sensors that sense a media item, determining, by a processor of a media validator, a respective validation score F indicating a likelihood that the sensed media item is valid;

determining, by the processor, if the media item is valid responsive to the plurality of validation scores by using a fuzzy logic approach rather than a voting-based approach;

comparing each respective validation score F to at least one predetermined threshold τ to generate a threshold result; and

responsive to said threshold result, determining a modified validation score x for each of said sensors; and

applying a membership function to each respective validation score F to determine said modified validation score x for each of said sensors, wherein the at least one membership function comprises said at least one predetermined threshold τ, wherein said membership function comprises:

{

x

=

1

,

if

F

τ

1

x

=

(

1

+

(

τ

1

-

F

)

+

(

τ

2

-

F

)

τ

2

-

τ

1

)

/

2

,

if

τ

1

<

F

τ

2

x

=

0

if

F

>

τ

2

,

,said at least one predetermined threshold t comprising threshold limits τ 1 and τ 2 .

Assignments (7)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE PROPERTIES SECTION BY INCLUDING IT WITH TEN PREVIOUSLY OMITTED PROPERTY NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 65346 FRAME 367. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Aug 13, 2025
From: NCR ATLEOS CORPORATION; CARDTRONICS USA, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 072445/0072 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 30, 2024
From: NCR CORPORATION
To: NCR VOYIX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067578/0417 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2024
From: NCR VOYIX CORPORATION
To: NCR ATLEOS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067590/0109 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE DOCUMENT DATE AND REMOVE THE OATH/DECLARATION (37 CFR 1.63) PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 065331 FRAME: 0297. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Oct 31, 2023
From: NCR ATLEOS CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 065627/0332 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2023
From: NCR ATLEOS CORPORATION; CARDTRONICS USA, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 065346/0367 →
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: NCR VOYIX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 065346/0531 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 24, 2023
From: NCR ATLEOS CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 065331/0297 →