IP Library Granted Patent US 9,409,554
Granted Patent B2
US 9,409,554 · App. 14/232,672 · Granted Aug 9, 2016

Method for improving the driving stability

Inventors: Thomas Raste (Oberursel, DE); Peter Lauer (Karben, DE); Peter E. Rieth (Eltville, DE)
Assignee: Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG
B60T7/12B60K31/0008B60T8/1755B60T2201/16B60T2210/12B60T2210/36Y02T10/84
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,409,554
App. No.
14/232,672
Granted
Aug 9, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a method for improving the driving stability of a motor vehicle in which driver-independent braking interventions are triggered if a critical driving situation is to be expected on the basis of route information and instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle, and to a corresponding system. According to the invention, the driver predefines, via a human/machine interface, information about the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized, which is used as the basis for the prediction of a critical driving situation.

Claims (21)

1. A method for improving the driving stability of a motor vehicle comprising:

enabling a driver to predefine, via a human/machine interface, information about a maximum coefficient of friction;

determining an expected coefficient of friction on the basis of route information and instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle;

comparing the expected coefficient of friction with the maximum coefficient of friction predetermined by the driver;

predicting whether a critical driving situation is to be expected on the basis of a result of the comparison of the expected coefficient of friction with the maximum coefficient of friction predetermined by the driver; and

triggering a driver-independent braking intervention if the critical driving situation is to be expected.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising determining a coefficient of friction which is required for safely driving along a predetermined route for a predefined distance on the basis of one or more instantaneous driving state variables, including instantaneous velocity, the route information and the instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle, taking into account a minimum bend radius which occurs in the predefined distance and the instantaneous velocity, wherein the predefined distance over which the coefficient of friction which is required for safely driving along the predetermined route is selected as a function of the instantaneous velocity.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2 , further comprising informing the driver about the coefficient of friction which is required to safely drive along the predetermined route, in particular by a visual display, which additionally makes available information about a weather situation in which a corresponding coefficient of friction is to be expected.

4. The method as claimed in claim 2 , further comprising determining a limiting speed for safely driving along the predetermined route for the predefined distance on the basis of the information relating to the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized, the route information and the instantaneous position data of the motor vehicle, taking into account the minimum bend radius occurring in the predefined distance, wherein the predefined distance over which the coefficient of friction which is required to safely drive along the predetermined route is determined is selected as a function of the instantaneous velocity.

5. The method as claimed in claim 4 , further comprising adding the instantaneous velocity to the limiting speed such that at least one of braking interventions take place at two or more wheels of the motor vehicle and the drive torque is reduced.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , further comprising selecting the applied braking forces as a function of at least one of the difference between the instantaneous velocity and the limiting speed and the distance from the point on the route with the minimum bend radius.

7. The method as claimed in claim 5 , further comprising limiting at least one of the applied braking forces and the change in the drive torque with respect to the accelerator position, in such a way that the longitudinal deceleration of the vehicle does not exceed a predetermined deceleration threshold value.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising informing the driver at least one of haptically and visually, by an accelerator pedal having active restoring forces, if a reduction in the velocity should take place in order to avoid critical driving situations, in order to ensure reliable driving along the predetermined route.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising modifying the information which is predefined by the driver and which relates to the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized on the basis of one or more further independent variables such as at least one of data of a rain sensor and current weather information, and checking the plausibility of said information, wherein, a minimum is formed between two independent values.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising triggering a braking intervention when the presence of a bend has been confirmed by at least one of a steering movement of the driver, the setting of a flashing indicator light, and information of a surroundings sensor system, comprising one or more cameras.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising at least one of controlling the distance from a vehicle traveling ahead and triggering an emergency braking operation when obstacles are detected on the roadway, wherein the controlling or the triggering is performed by an electronic control unit which is connected to the surroundings sensor system, and the setpoint value of the distance controlling device or the minimum distance, the undershooting of which triggers emergency braking, are/is selected or modified as a function of the information which is predefined by the driver and relates to the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized.

12. A system for regulating the driving stability of a motor vehicle, having an electronic control device configured to control the driver-independent building up of braking forces at one or more wheels of the motor vehicle, one or more sensors for sensing information about the instantaneous driving state, including at least one of a yaw rate sensor, a steering angle sensor, a lateral acceleration sensor, and wheel rotational speed sensors, a GPS receiver for determining the current vehicle position, and a navigation system with digital map data for making available route information, wherein a human/machine interface for inputting information on the maximum coefficient of friction to be utilized, in particular a switch and wherein the electronic control device carries out a method as claimed in claim 1 .

13. The system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the control device is further configured to at least one of haptically and visually inform the driver about the critical situation to be expected, including an accelerator pedal having active restoring forces, and estimate a coefficient of friction which is required to safely drive along a predefined route.

14. The system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the control device is further configured to regulate at least one of the distance from vehicles traveling ahead and the vehicle speed, wherein the control device is connected to a surroundings sensor system including one or more cameras.

15. The system as claimed in claim 12 , further comprising at least one of active shock absorbers, active roll stabilizers, a superimposition steering system at the front axle, and a rear-axle steering system.

16. Use of a system according to at least claim 12 , in a motor vehicle which is at least temporarily driven by one or more electric motors.

Assignments (2)
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 27, 2024
From: CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO. OHG; CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
To: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
Reel/Frame 068794/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2014
From: RASTE, THOMAS; LAUER, PETER; RIETH, PETER E., DR.
To: CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO. OHG
Reel/Frame 032656/0208 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2011 079 437 · Jul 19, 2011 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20140222272A1 · Aug 7, 2014