IP Library Patent Application 14251342
Patent Application
App. No. 14/251,342

SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING TOUR EVENT COMPARISON

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
14/251,342
Abstract

A system or method may be provided to compare the overall costs for attending different events in a tour. In particular, each overall cost may include admission cost, travel cost, and lodging cost. Further, the overall costs for different users who are planning to attend an event together as a group also are estimated. The users in the group may be located at different locations. Thus, overall costs for attending different events in a tour may be compared among different events of the tour and/or among different users in the group. In an embodiment, an event that results in a minimum aggregate cost for the group is selected and recommended to the group. In another embodiment, an event may be selected to balance the overall cost among the users in the group.

Claims (37)

1 . A system comprising:

a hardware memory storing information about event preferences of a user, and

one or more processors in communication with the memory and adapted to:

determine a plurality of events related to a tour and held at various locations; and

estimate, for each of the events in the tour, an overall cost of attendance for the user; and

present each overall cost for attending each of the events in the tour to the user for comparison.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the overall cost of attendance comprises one or more of an admission cost, a travel cost, and a lodging cost.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the travel cost includes cost related to a plurality of transportation modes including one or more of an airplane, a rental car, a taxi, a bus, a train, and a ferry.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the transportation modes are selected based on a travel preference of the user.

5 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the transportation modes are selected based on a distance between a location of the user and a location of the event.

6 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the admission cost is determined based on a seating preference of the user at each event.

7 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the lodging cost is determined based on a lodging preference of the user indicating a preferred category of lodging options.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the events in the tour are selected based on the user's availability determined from a calendar of the user.

9 . A method comprising:

determining, by a processor of a ticket exchange server, a plurality of events related to a tour and held at various locations; and

estimate, by the processor, for each of the events in the tour, an overall cost of attendance for a group including users located at different locations; and

present each overall cost for attending each of the events in the tour to the group for comparison.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the overall cost of attendance comprises one or more of an admission cost, a travel cost, and a lodging cost.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein each overall cost is presented in an event v. user comparison table listing an overall cost for each user v. event combination.

12 . The method of claim 9 further comprising presenting a map including locations of the users in the group and locations of the events in the tour.

13 . The method of claim 9 further comprising providing, along with the presented overall cost, a communication tool configured to implement real time communication between the users in the group.

14 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the travel cost or the lodging cost are determined based on a group preference for sharing means of travel or lodging.

15 . The method of claim 9 further comprising determining an overall cost for the group for each event in the tour by aggregating the overall costs of the users for each event.

16 . The method of claim 9 further comprising:

selecting an event in the tour that results in a minimum aggregate overall costs for the group; and

recommending the selected event to the group.

17 . The method of claim 9 further comprising:

selecting an event in the tour that has a balanced overall cost among the users in the group; and

recommending the selected event to the group.

18 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, in response to execution by a computer system, cause the computer system to perform a method comprising:

determining a plurality of events related to a tour and held at various locations;

estimating, for each of the events in the tour, an overall cost of attendance for a user; and

presenting each overall cost for attending each of the events in the tour to the user for comparison.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 , wherein the method further comprises:

selecting an event in the tour that results in a minimum overall cost for the user; and

recommending the selected event to the user.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 , where the method further comprises determining an admission cost, a travel cost, and a lodging cost for attending each of the events in the tour.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2018
From: STUBHUB, INC.
To: EBAY INC.
Reel/Frame 047533/0880 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 11, 2015
From: FARHI, ADAM
To: STUBHUB, INC.
Reel/Frame 037276/0816 →