Method and system to authenticate an object
The system and methods disclosed herein validate the authenticity of a document and an individual's claimed identity. The system and method use a validation facility that is configurable to compare and match characteristics of biometric and non-biometric data presented by an individual with biometric and non-biometric data received from a request to a database or file system holding such information. The determination on the matching characteristics of the data can occur in completely automated fashion without intervention from the user, but user intervention is also possible allowing the user to review and override certain data discrepancies. The validation facility provides a user interface for use by a user to review a determination on the data analysis and instruct the validation facility to override that determination if the user determines the cause of the identity verification failure is within an acceptable criterion.
1. A computer-assisted method for authenticating an individual, the method comprising:
receiving non-biometric information of an individual;
receiving biometric information of the individual;
determining, by one or more processors, whether erroneous data is present in the non-biometric information;
requesting an analysis to compare the non-biometric information and the biometric information with data associated with the individual and obtained from one or more data sources coupled to the one or more processors, the one or more data sources being selected based on an environment or context in which the non-biometric information and the biometric information are to be analyzed, wherein the one or more data sources include a first data source and second data source, the first data source having a first weight corresponding to a reliability of data in the first data source and the second data source having a second weight corresponding to a reliability of data in the second data source;
receiving a result of the analysis that provides an authentication of the individual, wherein the analysis is based on determining a validation score for each of the data sources, the validation score for each data source determined based on comparing the non-biometric information and the biometric information with the data associated with the individual obtained from the respective data source, and wherein the result of the analysis is based on combining the validation scores based on at least the first weight and the second weight, the validation scores being combined to improve a confidence level in the result; and
accommodating, in the result by the one or more processors, the erroneous data determined to be present in the non-biometric information.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving a document from the individual, the document providing identity information of the individual; and
determining if the document is a valid document.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
displaying a representation of the result of the analysis,
wherein the analysis is performed on a plurality of data categories corresponding to the one or more data sources.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein:
the biometric information comprises digital data encoded in a magnetic stripe, a smart chip, or a memory device;
the non-biometric information comprises a name, address, date of birth, and additional biographical and demographic information of the individual; and
the plurality of data categories are selected from at least one of biometric data, transaction data, itinerary data, biographic data, demographic data, or watchlist data for identifying undesirable individuals.
5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the analysis provides a validation score for each of the plurality of data categories.
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
providing an audio representation of the result.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
storing at least one of the analysis or the result in a data structure.
8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
creating a profile for the individual,
wherein the profile comprises an identity profile for the individual indicating whether the individual is entitled to a particular authenticated identity.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether erroneous data is present in the non-biometric information comprises detecting one or more of a spelling error, an abbreviation, and outdated information in the non-biometric information.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether erroneous data is present in the non-biometric information comprises:
utilizing a Bayesian inference network to detect erroneous data in the non-biometric information, and
wherein receiving a result of the analysis comprises:
determining a validation score according to the Bayesian inference network.
11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium holding computer executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, are configured to cause the processor to perform operations comprising:
receiving non-biometric information of an individual;
receiving biometric information of the individual;
determining, by one or more processors, whether erroneous data is present in the non-biometric information;
requesting an analysis to compare the non-biometric information and the biometric information with data associated with the individual and obtained from one or more data sources coupled to the one or more processors, the one or more data sources being selected based on an environment or context in which the non-biometric information and the biometric information are to be analyzed, wherein the one or more data sources include a first data source and second data source, the first data source having a first weight corresponding to a reliability of data in the first data source and the second data source having a second weight corresponding to a reliability of data in the second data source;
receiving a result of the analysis that provides an authentication of the individual, wherein the analysis is based on determining a validation score for each of the data sources, the validation score for each data source determined based on comparing the non-biometric information and the biometric information with the data associated with the individual obtained from the respective data source, and wherein the result of the analysis is based on combining the validation scores based on at least the first weight and the second weight, the validation scores being combined to improve a confidence level in the result; and
accommodating, in the result by the one or more processors, the erroneous data determined to be present in the non-biometric information.
12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform operations further comprising: receiving a document from the individual, the document providing identity information of the individual; and
determining if the document is a valid document.
13. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform operations further comprising:
displaying a representation of the result of the analysis,
wherein the analysis is performed on a plurality of data categories corresponding to the one or more data sources.
14. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein:
the biometric information comprises digital data encoded in a magnetic stripe, a smart chip, or a memory device;
the non-biometric information comprises a name, address, date of birth, and additional biographical and demographic information of the individual; and
the plurality of data categories are selected from at least one of biometric data, transaction data, itinerary data, biographic data, demographic data, or watchlist data for identifying undesirable individuals.
15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform operations further comprising:
providing an audio representation of the result.
16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform operations further comprising:
storing at least one of the analysis or the result in a data structure.
17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform operations further comprising:
creating a profile for the individual,
wherein the profile comprises an identity profile for the individual indicating whether the individual is entitled to a particular authenticated identity.
18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein determining whether erroneous data is present in the non-biometric information comprises detecting one or more of a spelling error, an abbreviation, and outdated information in the non-biometric information.
19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein determining whether erroneous data is present in the non-biometric information comprises:
utilizing a Bayesian inference network to detect erroneous data in the non-biometric information, and
wherein receiving a result of the analysis comprises:
determining a validation score according to the Bayesian inference network.