IP Library Granted Patent US 9,020,844
Granted Patent B2
US 9,020,844 · App. 14/256,796 · Granted Apr 28, 2015

System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions

Inventors: Thomas Taira (Berkeley, CA); Scott Painter (Bel Air, CA); Chris Taylor (Austin, TX); Robert Taylor (Scottsdale, AZ); Michael D. Swinson (Santa Monica, CA)
Assignee: Truecar, Inc.
G06Q30/0621G06Q10/067G06Q30/02G06Q30/0207G06Q30/0282G06Q30/0283G06Q30/0601G06Q30/0605G06Q30/0629G06Q30/0641G06Q30/0643G06Q30/08G06Q30/0611G06Q30/0206
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,020,844
App. No.
14/256,796
Granted
Apr 28, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of systems and methods for the aggregation, analysis, display and monetization of pricing data for commodities in general, and which may be particularly useful applied to vehicles are disclosed. Specifically, in certain embodiments, historical transaction data associated with a particular vehicle configuration may be obtained and processed to determine pricing data associated with the vehicle configuration. The historical transaction data or determined pricing data may then be presented in an intuitive manner.

Claims (29)

1. A system, comprising:

a vehicle data system including a processor coupled to one or more devices over a network, the vehicle data system comprising:

a processing module, the processing module configured to:

receive a specified vehicle configuration;

obtain a set of historical transaction data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, where the set of historical transaction data was collected asynchronously and comprises data on transactions associated with vehicles of the specified vehicle configuration;

determine pricing data corresponding to the specified vehicle configuration by applying one or more pre-determined models to the set of historical transaction data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, wherein the pricing data includes a set of transaction prices and one or more price ranges determined based on the set of historical transaction data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, and the one or more price ranges are quantifiable; and

an interface module configured to:

generate an interface based on the pricing data, wherein the interface is configured to present the set of transaction prices and the one or more quantifiable price ranges relative to the set of transaction prices.

2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a data store storing the set of historical transaction data and wherein the set of historical transaction data comprises one or more prices associated with the specified vehicle configuration actually sold to a consumer.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more prices comprise at least an invoice price, a dealer cost, a manufacturer suggested retail price, or a transaction price paid by the consumer for the particular vehicle.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the specified vehicle configuration is associated with a set of vehicle attributes comprising at least a vehicle make, model, trim, or power train.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the historical transaction data is grouped by the vehicle make, model, trim or power train.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more models includes a dealer cost model.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the dealer cost model is one of a set of dealer cost models, each dealer cost model corresponding to a manufacturer.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the dealer cost model is generated by analyzing invoice data corresponding to the manufacturer and determining a holdback price.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining pricing data comprises adjusting the transactions for incentives.

10. A method, comprising:

receiving a specified vehicle configuration;

obtaining a set of historical transaction data associated the specified vehicle configuration, where the set of historical transaction data was collected asynchronously and comprises data on transactions associated with vehicles of the specified vehicle configuration;

determining, at a vehicle data system having a processor, pricing data corresponding to the specified vehicle configuration by applying one or more pre-determined models to the set of historical transaction data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, wherein the pricing data includes a set of transaction prices and one or more price ranges determined based on the set of historical transaction data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, and the one or more price ranges are quantifiable; and

generating, at a vehicle data system having a processor, an interface based on the pricing data, wherein the interface is configured to present the set of transaction prices and the one or more price ranges relative to the set of transaction prices.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of historical transaction data comprises one or more prices associated with the specified vehicle configuration actually sold to a consumer.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more prices comprise at least an invoice price, a dealer cost, a manufacturer suggested retail price, or a transaction price paid by the consumer for the particular vehicle.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the specified vehicle configuration is associated with a set of vehicle attributes comprising at least a vehicle make, model, trim, or power train.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the historical transaction data is grouped by the vehicle make, model, trim or power train.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the one or more models includes a dealer cost model.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the dealer cost model is one of a set of dealer cost models, each dealer cost model corresponding to a manufacturer.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the dealer cost model is generated by analyzing invoice data corresponding to the manufacturer and determining a holdback price.

18. The method of claim 10 , wherein determining pricing data comprises adjusting the transactions for incentives.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2018
From: TRUECAR, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 045128/0195 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2014
From: TAIRA, TOM; PAINTER, SCOTT; TAYLOR, CHRIS; TAYLOR, ROBERT; SWINSON, MIKE
To: TRUECAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 032999/0739 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 12556109 · Sep 9, 2009
Provisional Application 61095550 · Sep 9, 2008
Provisional Application 61095376 · Sep 9, 2008
Related Publication 20140229241A1 · Aug 14, 2014