Maximum output power configuration with UE preference in carrier aggregation
A method of maximum output power configuration with UE preference in carrier aggregation is provided. A UE configures multiple component carriers (CCs) with carrier aggregation for communicating with a serving base station in a mobile communication network. The UE determines channel condition of multiple serving cells over the corresponding multiple CCs. The UE then determines maximum output power for each CC based at least in part on the corresponding channel condition of each CC. Finally, the UE transmits power headroom report (PHR) for each CC to the serving base station, wherein the PHR is calculated based on the determined maximum output power. As a result, the reported PH information is channel condition dependent, which can be used by eNB for facilitating better transmission scheduling.
1. A method comprising:
configuring multiple component carriers (CCs) with carrier aggregation for a user equipment (UE) to communicate with multiple serving cells in a mobile communication network;
determining channel condition of the multiple serving cells over the corresponding multiple CCs;
determining maximum output power for each CC based at least in part on the corresponding channel condition of each CC, wherein the maximum output power for each CC is determined to approach a higher limit for a first serving cell having a better channel condition, and wherein the maximum output power is determined to approach a lower limit for a second serving cell having a poorer channel condition; and
transmitting power headroom report (PHR) for each CC to a serving base station, wherein the PHR is calculated based on the determined maximum output power.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the channel condition is determined by estimating a channel quality indicator (CQI) of each serving cell.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the channel condition is determined by estimating a channel power gain, a signal-to-interference plus noise ratio, or a spectral efficiency.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein a maximum output power plus an inverse of a channel power gain for each CC is approximately equal to each other when each CC has the same channel bandwidth.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein each CC is first divided into sub-channels having the same sub-channel bandwidth, and wherein a maximum output power plus an inverse of a channel power gain for each sub-channel is approximately equal to each other.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein each maximum output power is ranged within the lower limit and the higher limit, wherein the UE determines the higher limit as the configured maximum transmit power for the first serving cell having the better channel condition, and wherein the UE determines the lower limit as the configured maximum transmit power for the second serving cell having the poorer channel condition.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein each maximum output power for each CC is determined to be approximately proportional to an average spectral efficiency of each corresponding CC.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein each maximum output power is determined based at least in part on a Maximum Power Reduction (MPR) value determined based at least in part on a corresponding channel condition.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the MPR value is configured at a minimum of a first range for the first serving cell having the better channel condition, and wherein the MPR value is configured at a maximum of a second range for the second serving cell having the poorer channel condition.
10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the MPR value is determined to approach the lower limit for the first serving cell having the better channel condition, and wherein the MPR value is determined to approach a higher limit for the same serving cell when that first serving cell has a poorer channel condition.
11. A user equipment (UE) comprising:
a configuration module that configures multiple component carriers (CCs) with carrier aggregation for communicating with multiple serving cells in a mobile communication network;
a measurement module that determines channel condition of the multiple serving cells over the corresponding multiple CCs;
a power control module that determines maximum output power for each CC based at least in part on the corresponding channel condition of each CC, wherein the power control module determines that the maximum output power for each CC approaches a higher limit for a first serving cell having a better channel condition, and wherein the power control module determines that the maximum output power approaches a lower limit for a second serving cell having a poorer channel condition; and
a transmitter that transmits power headroom report (PHR) for each CC to a serving base station, wherein the PHR is calculated based on the determined maximum output power.
12. The UE of claim 11 , wherein the channel condition is determined by estimating a channel quality indicator of each serving cell.
13. The UE of claim 11 , wherein the channel condition is determined by estimating a channel power gain, a signal-to-interference plus noise ratio, or a spectral efficiency.
14. The UE of claim 11 , wherein a maximum output power plus an inverse of a channel power gain for each CC is approximately equal to each other when each CC has the same channel bandwidth.
15. The UE of claim 11 , wherein each CC is first divided into sub-channels having the same sub-channel bandwidth, and wherein a maximum output power plus an inverse of a channel power gain for each sub-channel is approximately equal to each other.
16. The UE of claim 11 , wherein each maximum output power is ranged within the lower limit and the higher limit, wherein the UE determines the higher limit as the configured maximum transmit power for the first serving cell having the better channel condition, and wherein the UE determines the lower limit as the configured maximum transmit power for the second serving cell having the poorer channel condition.
17. The UE of claim 11 , wherein each maximum output power for each CC is determined to be approximately proportional to an average spectral efficiency of each corresponding CC.
18. The UE of claim 11 , wherein each maximum output power is determined based at least in part on a Maximum Power Reduction (MPR) value determined based at least in part on a corresponding channel condition.
19. The UE of claim 18 , wherein the MPR value is configured at a minimum of a first range for the first serving cell having a better channel condition, and wherein the MPR value is configured at a maximum of a second range for the second serving cell having the poorer channel condition.
20. The UE of claim 18 , wherein the MPR value is determined to approach the lower limit for the first serving cell having the better channel condition, and wherein the MPR value is determined to approach the higher limit for the same serving cell when that first serving cell has a poorer channel condition.