Computer processes for analyzing and suggesting improvements for text readability
Computer-based processes are disclosed for analyzing and improving document readability. Document readability is improved by using rules and associated logic to automatically detect various types of writing problems and to make and/or suggest edits for eliminating such problems. Many of the rules seek to generate more concise formulations of the analyzed sentences, such as by eliminating unnecessary words, rearranging words and phrases, and making various other types of edits. Proposed edits can be conveyed, e.g., through a word processing platform, by changing the visual appearance of text to indicate how the text would appear with (or with and without) the edit.
1. Non-transitory computer storage having stored thereon executable code that directs a computer system to perform a method of automatic text evaluation, the method comprising:
detecting whether a particular readability issue exists in text, notwithstanding that the text may be otherwise grammatically correct;
scanning for at least one sign that indicates the possible occurrence or absence of the readability issue, the at least one sign comprising the term “that”; and
implementing correction logic for correcting the issue, the correction logic specifying a proposed edit, the edit comprising one or some combination of the following:
deleting text;
adding text; and/or
reordering text,
wherein scanning for at least one sign further comprises scanning for “that” as a primary sign and scanning for additional signs; and
wherein scanning for additional signs comprises scanning for one or some combination of the following: “what”, “who”, “it,” and/or a “to be” verb;
the method further comprising: determining if the word immediately preceding “that” is a “to be” verb and if so, determining if the term “it” immediately precedes the “to be” verb and if so, determining if the term “what” or the term “who” immediately precedes “it” and
conveying the proposed edit to a user through a computer interface.
2. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 1 , wherein,
if all the conditions are met, the correction logic comprises specifying the following proposed edit:
deleting the term “it”;
deleting the “to be” verb; and
deleting the term “that”.
3. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 1 , wherein conveying the proposed edit comprises displaying to a user what the text would look like with text portions proposed for deletion visually de-emphasized on a display.
4. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 3 , wherein conveying the proposed edit further comprises displaying to a user what the text would look like with text portions proposed for deletion shown in a different color, intensity, or font.
5. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 1 , wherein conveying the proposed edit comprises displaying to a user what the text would look like with text portions proposed for deletion de-emphasized, and text proposed for addition emphasized.
6. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 1 , wherein the method of automatic text evaluation is performed as a component of a word processing application and a proposed edit is displayed through that word processing application.
7. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 1 , wherein conveying the proposed edit further comprises using a graphic user interface to prompt a user to accept or reject the proposed edit through a specified action.
8. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 7 , wherein the specified action comprises allowing a user to select “accept” or “reject” buttons displayed on a graphic user interface.