System and method for proactive management of an information handling system with in-situ measurement of end user actions
View Patent ↗Dissatisfaction variables track inputs made by an end user at an information handling system that are associated with end user dissatisfaction regarding the operation of the information handling system, such as corrective actions, so that an alert issues if a dissatisfaction variable changes by a predetermined amount over a predetermined time period. Dissatisfaction variables identify a pattern of a change in behavior by an end user rather than the operational status of system components. For example, an increase in end user forced shutdowns of the information handling system indicates end user dissatisfaction with the information handling system, such as repeated freezes of the operating system so that performing a timely diagnostics will improve end user satisfaction and proactively correct and impending system failure.
1. An information handling system comprising:
a housing;
processing components disposed in the housing and operable to process information;
plural input devices interfaced with the processing components, each input device operable to detect one or more end user inputs;
a monitoring agent disposed in the housing and operable to track one or more predetermined of the end user inputs as one or more dissatisfaction variables, each dissatisfaction variable associated with a corrective action made by an end user input; and
a reporting agent interfaced with the monitoring agent and operable to track corrective action as an incident and to request proactive diagnostics of the information handling system in response to detection of a predetermined plural number of incidents in a predetermined time period.
2. The information handling system of claim 1 wherein the dissatisfaction variable comprises restarts of the information handling system initiated through the operating system.
3. The information handling system of claim 1 wherein the dissatisfaction variable comprises shutdowns of the information handling system through the operating system.
4. The information handling system of claim 1 wherein the dissatisfaction variable comprises forced shutdowns of the information handling system.
5. The information handling system of claim 4 wherein the forced shutdown comprises pressing and holding a power switch of the information handling system.
6. The information handling system of claim 4 wherein the forced shutdown comprises removal of a battery from the housing.
7. The information handling system of claim 4 wherein the forced shutdown comprises removal of an external power source from the information handling system.
8. The information handling system of claim 1 wherein the dissatisfaction variable comprises turning a wireless network transceiver off and on.
9. The information handling system of claim 1 wherein the reporting agent is further operable to formulate a baseline number of incidents by monitoring the dissatisfaction variable for a predetermined time and assess a change from the baseline to set the predetermined plural number of incidents at which to request proactive diagnostics.
10. A method for managing operation of an information handling system, the method comprising:
monitoring an end user input at the information handling system over a predetermined time to define a baseline number for the end user input over a predetermined time period, the end user input associated with a corrective action for an error at the information handling system;
detecting an increase of the end user input at the information handling system over the predetermined time period; and
issuing a dissatisfaction alert for the information handling system.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the end user input comprises a forced power down.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the forced power down comprises pressing and holding a power button to command a power down.
13. The method of claim 11 wherein the forced power down comprises removal of power from the information handling system.
14. The method of claim 10 wherein the end user input comprises removing a component from the information handling system and replacing the same component in the information handling system.
15. The method of claim 10 wherein the end user input comprises powering a display of the information handling system down and then up within a predetermined time.
16. The method of claim 10 further comprising increasing the number of dissatisfaction variables monitored at the information handling system in response to the alert.
17. The method of claim 10 further comprising responding to the dissatisfaction alert with a diagnostics associated with the end user input.
18. A system for managing operation of an information handling system, the system comprising:
non-transitory memory storing:
a monitoring agent operable to track an end user input at the information handling system, the end user input associated with a corrective action made by an end user to correct improper operation of the information handling system; and
a reporting agent interfaced with the monitoring agent and operable to report an alert for the information handling system in response to detection of plural of the end user inputs monitored by the monitoring agent over a predetermined time period, the plural number of the end user input at the information handling system reported by the reporting agent if the plural number is greater than a threshold number.
19. The system of claim 18 further comprising a diagnostics agent interfaced with the reporting agent and operable to initiate diagnostic at the information handling system in response to the alert.
20. The system of claim 19 wherein the corrective action made by an end user comprises a forced power down of the information handling system.