IP Library Granted Patent US 9,645,900
Granted Patent B2
US 9,645,900 · App. 14/279,199 · Granted May 9, 2017

Warm standby appliance

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,645,900
App. No.
14/279,199
Granted
May 9, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A warm standby appliance is described herein. The warm standby appliance is coupled to a storage server which is coupled to one or more servers. When a server fails, the storage server transfers a backed up image to the warm standby appliance, so that the warm standby appliance is able to replicate the failed server. While the failed server is inaccessible, the warm standby appliance is able to mimic the functionality of the failed server. When a new server or repaired server is available, the warm standby appliance is no longer needed. To incorporate the new server into the system quickly and easily, the server image of the warm standby appliance is sent to the new server. After transferring the image, the warm standby appliance is cleaned and returns back to a dormant state, waiting to be utilized again.

Claims (44)

1. A system for providing network stability and data reliability, comprising:

a. one or more first servers;

b. a second server coupled to the one or more first servers,

wherein the second server stores data received from the one or more first servers; and

c. one or more computing devices coupled to the second server,

wherein the one or more computing devices perform functions of a number of the first servers that have failed upon receiving the data from the second server;

wherein, when the number of failed first servers exceeds the number of computing devices, the second server generates at least one virtual server to perform functions of at least one failed first server whose functions are not being performed by the one or more computing devices.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the second server is a storage server.

3. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the one or more first servers back up the data onto the second server using a continuous backup scheme.

4. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the second server stores system images of the one or more first servers.

5. The system as claimed in claim 4 wherein the second server transfers one or more of the system images to the one or more computing devices when the number of first servers fail.

6. The system as claimed in claim 5 wherein the one or more computing devices transfer the one or more of the system images to a replacement server for the number of first servers.

7. The system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the one or more computing devices clears the one or more of the system images from the one or more computing devices.

8. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the one or more computing devices mimic the one or more first servers.

9. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the one or more first servers are accessible by customers.

10. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the one or more computing devices are running and available to receive the data from the second server before the number of first servers fail.

11. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least one of the one or more computing devices is remotely accessible.

12. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the second server generates a virtual server to perform functions of one of the number of first servers if the one or more computing devices are unavailable.

13. A method of providing network stability and data reliability, comprising:

a. backing up data from one or more first servers to a second server;

b. transferring the data from the second server to one or more computing devices when one or more of the first servers fail; and

c. serving the data utilizing at least one of the one or more computing devices until the one or more first servers are replaced;

wherein, when the number of failed first servers exceeds the number of computing devices, the second server generates at least one virtual server to perform functions of at least one failed first server whose functions are not being performed by the one or more computing devices.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 further comprising replacing the failed first servers.

15. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the second server is a storage server.

16. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the one or more first servers back up the data onto the second server using a continuous backup scheme.

17. The method as claimed in claim 13 further comprising storing system images of the one or more first servers on the second server.

18. The method as claimed in claim 17 further comprising transferring the system images from the second server to one or more of the computing devices when a number of the first servers fail, wherein the system images correspond to the number of failed first servers.

19. The method as claimed in claim 18 further comprising transferring the system images from the one or more of the computing devices to one or more replacement servers for the number of failed first servers.

20. The method as claimed in claim 19 further comprising clearing the system images from the one or more of the computing devices.

21. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein serving the data utilizing the one or more computing devices includes mimicking the number of failed first servers before the first servers failed.

22. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the first servers are accessible by customers.

23. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the computing devices are running and available to receive the data from the second server before the number of first servers fail.

24. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein at least one of the computing devices is remotely accessible.

25. The method as claimed in claim 13 further comprising generating one or more virtual servers with the second server to perform functions of the number of first servers if the one or more computing devices are unavailable.

26. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the one or more first servers are a part of a set of first servers.

27. A method of providing network stability and data reliability, comprising:

a. backing up data from one or more first servers to a second server;

b. detecting when one or more of the first servers are going to fail;

c. transferring the data from the second server to one or more computing devices when one or more of the first servers fail;

d. serving the data utilizing one or more of the computing devices until the one or more failed first servers are replaced; and

e. clearing the data from the one or more computing devices after the one or more failed first servers have been replaced;

wherein, when a number of failed first servers exceeds a total number of the one or more computing devices, the second server generates at least one virtual server to perform functions of at least one failed first server whose functions are not being performed by the one or more computing devices.

28. The method of claim 27 wherein the data comprises applications that enable the functioning of the one or more first servers.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 23, 2015
From: MAXSP CORPORATION
To: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC
Reel/Frame 036168/0302 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 21, 2015
From: NEW CHECKERBOARD CATTLE AND COMPUTER CORPORATION
To: MAXSP CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 036148/0889 →
NUNC PRO TUNC CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 7/1/2008 WHICH CONFIRMS THE AGREEMENT OF SALE EXECUTED ON 7/1/2008 FROM MAXSP CORPORATION TO JOHN B. GOODRICH Recorded Jul 21, 2015
From: MAXSP CORPORATION
To: GOODRICH, JOHN B.
Reel/Frame 036163/0082 →
NUNC PRO TUNC CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 7/1/2008 WHICH CONFIRMS THE BILL OF SALE EXECUTED ON 9/12/2008 FROM JOHN B. GOODRICH TO NEW CHECKERBOARD CATTLE AND COMPUTER CORPORATION Recorded Jul 21, 2015
From: GOODRICH, JOHN B.
To: NEW CHECKERBOARD CATTLE AND COMPUTER CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 036163/0287 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2014
From: KEITH, ROBERT O., JR.
To: MAXSP CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032907/0255 →