Systems and methods for interactively disambiguating entities
View Patent ↗The disclosure relates to entity disambiguation in an interactive fashion based upon attributes. Once disambiguated, a manner in which to review a future article based upon an initial set of attributes and an additional set of attributes and, when needed, generate a warning flag based upon the review is also described. The warning flag may result in a change in the relationship between the entity and an organization such as a bank that is considering engaging in a business relationship with a candidate client, and that may subsequently abandon that plan, or a bank that had previously extended credit to the entity, and that subsequently may be less inclined as a result of the information retrieved by the present invention. A previously accepted entity may also be flagged for credit or anti-money laundering consideration if and when the applicant's situation (e.g., financial situation, involvement in anti-money laundering) changes.
1. An automated, computer implemented method of disambiguating a first entity, the method comprising:
storing a record for the first entity, the record relating to an initial set of attributes;
identifying a first list of documents based upon the initial set of attributes, the first list of documents being associated with a set of documents having a first order;
receiving a signal associated with an analysis of a first document from the set of documents, said analysis comprising determining an initial set of positive and negative attributes;
based upon the signal, identifying an additional set of attributes associated with the first entity, the additional set of attributes comprising an additional set of positive and negative attributes to contribute to disambiguating the first entity;
based upon the initial set of attributes and the additional set of attributes:
generating a modified record comprising in part the initial set of positive and negative attributes and the additional set of positive and negative attributes; and
generating a second list of documents associated with the set of documents having the first order, based in part on a predetermined intersection of the initial set of positive and negative attributes and the additional set of positive and negative attributes, the second list of documents having a second order, wherein said generating comprises removing a corresponding document from the second list of documents based on negative attributes of the initial set of attributes and the negative attributes of the additional set of attributes, a first average ranking for a subset of documents associated with the set of evidence being lower than a second average ranking for the subset of documents associated with the set of evidence, the first average ranking being related to the first order and the second average ranking being related to the second order;
storing the modified record; and
storing the second list of documents.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first entity is more easily disambiguated from a second entity using both the initial set of attributes and the additional set of attributes as opposed to using only the initial set of attributes.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the first entity is selected from the group consisting of a person, a place, a corporation, a company, an organization, a financial instrument name, and a financial instrument code.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
a. reviewing a future article based on the initial set of attributes and the additional set attributes; and
b. generating a warning flag based upon the review.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the warning flag is associated with a potential action selected from the group consisting of cancelling a line of credit of the first entity, modifying a line of credit of the first entity, computing a score reflecting credit-worthiness of the first entity, determining whether to permit the first entity to open a bank account, determining whether it is legal do conduct business with the first entity, terminating a relationship with the first entity, flagging the relationship for human review, determining whether the first entity is sanctioned, determining whether the first entity is in compliance with a policy, recommending further due diligence prior to entering into a relationship with or terminating a relationship with the first entity, and determining whether the first entity is connected to financial crime, bribery and corruption, terrorism, environmental or other crimes.
6. A system for disambiguating a first entity, the system comprising:
a database for storing a record for the first entity, the record relating to an initial set of attributes;
a processor for identifying a first list of documents based upon the initial set of attributes wherein the first list of documents is associated with a set of documents having a first order;
a communications module for receiving a signal associated with an analysis of a first document from the set of documents, said analysis comprising determining an initial set of positive and negative attributes;
a set of application programs stored in a memory and adapted to be executed by the processor wherein execution of the set of application programs is responsive to the signal and causes the system to:
identify an additional set of attributes associated with the first entity, the additional set of attributes comprising an additional set of positive and negative attributes to contribute to disambiguating the first entity;
generate a modified record based upon the initial set of attributes and the additional set of attributes, comprising in part the initial set of positive and negative attributes and the additional set of positive and negative attributes; and
generate a second list of documents associated with the set of documents having the first order, based in part on a predetermined intersection of the initial set of positive and negative attributes and the additional set of positive and negative attributes, the second list of documents having a second order, wherein said generate comprises removing a corresponding document from the second list of documents based on negative attributes of the initial set of attributes and the negative attributes of the additional set of attributes, and a first average ranking for a subset of documents associated with the set of evidence is lower than a second average ranking for the subset of documents associated with the set of evidence and the first average ranking is related to the first order and the second average ranking is related to the second order; and
a memory for storing the modified record and the second list of documents.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein the first entity is more easily disambiguated from a second entity using both the initial set of attributes and the additional set of attributes as opposed to using only the initial set of attributes.
8. The system of claim 6 wherein the first entity is selected from the group consisting of a person, a place, a corporation, a company, an organization, a financial instrument name, and a financial instrument code.
9. The system of claim 6 wherein the set of application programs further comprises:
a first set of code for reviewing a future article based on the initial set of attributes and the additional set attributes; and
a second set of code for generating a warning flag based upon the review.
10. The system of claim 9 wherein the warning flag is associated with a potential action selected from the group consisting of cancelling a line of credit of the first entity, modifying a line of credit of the first entity, computing a score reflecting credit-worthiness of the first entity, determining whether to permit the first entity to open a bank account, determining whether it is legal do conduct business with the first entity, terminating a relationship with the first entity, flagging the relationship for human review, determining whether the first entity is sanctioned, determining whether the first entity is in compliance with a policy, recommending further due diligence prior to entering into a relationship with or terminating a relationship with the first entity, and determining whether the first entity is connected to financial crime, bribery and corruption, terrorism, environmental or other crimes.
11. The system of claim 9 wherein the first set of code and the second set of code are adapted to be executed daily.
12. The method of claim 2 wherein the second entity is selected from the group consisting of a person, a place, a corporation, a company, an organization, a financial instrument name, and a financial instrument code.
13. The system of claim 7 wherein the second entity is selected from the group consisting of a person, a place, a corporation, a company, an organization, a financial instrument name, and a financial instrument code.